Whalefall
← all movies. Each comment's label under every pathway (+ positive, − negative, 0 neutral / mixed / no verdict; hover a cell for the verdict).
Pick a pathway to show its verdict and rationale under every comment: VADER (old v1) · siebert+opinion (previous live) · Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) · GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE) · Claude Opus 5.5 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Gemini 4 Argon · Grok 4.7 · GPT-6 Luna (cheap) · Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) · Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap)
| comment (excerpt ≤280 chars) | VADER (old v1) | siebert+opinion (previous live) | Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) | GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE) | Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.7 | GPT-6 Luna (cheap) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank · score · bucket · Reddit · comments +/0/− | #11 63 Depends R 58 50/13/34 | #11 66 Depends R 65 41/32/24 | #11 51 Skip R 33 16/53/28 | #10 72 Depends R 80 39/51/7 | #9 75 Depends R 85 39/54/4 | #9 77 Depends R 91 38/54/5 | #10 75 Depends R 85 38/55/4 | #10 74 Depends R 84 40/51/6 | #10 70 Depends R 75 40/46/11 | #10 75 Depends R 84 42/47/8 | #10 74 Depends R 83 36/53/8 |
| thread #1 w 0.707 Dude uses a jellyfish as a flashlight, and the whale becomes such a metaphor for his dad it starts talking to him. It certainly is a movie. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.34 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.36 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.63 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Mocking the implausible plot and ending with “It certainly is a movie” conveys a dismissive verdict. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Mocks absurd plot elements; 'It certainly is a movie' is a sarcastic, dismissive judgement. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes quirky plot elements with an ambiguous, noncommittal closing quip ('certainly is a movie'); no clear like or dislike. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Mocks absurd plot points and uses the dismissive phrase 'It certainly is a movie' to express dislike. Grok 4.7: negative — Sarcastic plot mockery and faint 'it is a movie' dismissal. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — The sarcastic “It certainly is a movie” dismisses the film’s absurd choices rather than praising them. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes plot elements and a wry remark ('It certainly is a movie') without clearly judging whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Describes absurd plot points and concludes with the ambiguous phrase 'It certainly is a movie'. | + | 0 | 0 | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #2 w 0.577 I once saw a dude catch and use jellyfish jelly in a burger VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.19 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Shares an anecdote about jellyfish in a burger without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Off-topic anecdote about jellyfish in a burger; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Off-topic anecdote about jellyfish in a burger; no judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a joke referencing SpongeBob SquarePants with no evaluation of the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Unrelated anecdote with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — An anecdote about a burger contains no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Anecdote about a jellyfish burger with no judgement of the film Whalefall. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is an unrelated anecdote about a jellyfish burger, not about the movie. | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #3 w 0.5 it's no ordinary sandwich VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.296 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.55 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.29 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A joke or quote with no judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — A joke or quote reference with no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A short joke or quote-like remark about a sandwich, with no judgement of the film's quality or any recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a joke or quote with no opinion expressed on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke or quote with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke without an expressed judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — A joke quote with no judgement of the film's quality or whether the commenter would recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Just a quote or joke, no judgment of the film. | − | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #4 w 0.447 Skibbity beeta botta boota botta daddity-dow VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.42 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Nonsensical phrasing provides no judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Nonsense/joke phrase with no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Nonsense/joke lyrics with no judgment of the film or indication of whether they liked it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is just nonsensical scatting/joking and expresses no opinion on the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Gibberish with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is nonsensical and expresses no opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Nonsense jokey text with no judgement of the film or its quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Gibberish comment with no opinion on the film. | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #6 w 0.378 it was sending me when he started encouraging the jellyfish VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.527 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.32 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.36 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Expresses amusement at a specific moment without judging the film overall. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Amused reaction to one scene; no clear judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — VADER 0.527 Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter finds one specific moment funny, which does not establish an overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Found a scene hilarious and entertaining. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say the jellyfish scene made them laugh, expressing enjoyment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a scene's effect ('sending me') and a plot detail without clearly judging whether the film is good or worth recommending. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment shares a humorous moment without expressing an overall opinion or verdict on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #7 w 0.354 Oh, a FLASHLIGHT. I thought- …never mind. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.18 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.63 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A joke about mistaking an object, with no judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke or misunderstanding about a plot detail; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joking, cryptic remark about a flashlight (likely a plot detail) with no judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is just a wordplay joke with no opinion or judgment on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke or quip with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A brief joke with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Quotes a scene moment and trails off; no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment contains a joke or misinterpretation without expressing an opinion on the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #8 w 0.333 Misread that as fleshlight VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.273 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.32 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.38 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A joke about misreading a word, with no judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about misreading the title; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke about misreading the title; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is just a joke about misreading a word, with no opinion on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about misreading the title; no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about misreading the title, with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about misreading the title; it gives no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke/misinterpretation unrelated to the film's quality. | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #9 w 0.316 I mean, even 127 Hours has a sort of masturbation scene in it. If you told me that the guy trapped in a whale tries to jerk it at some point I wouldn’t be entirely surprised. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.558 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.38 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.60 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Speculates jokingly about a possible scene without judging the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joking comparison to 127 Hours; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke speculating about the film's content by comparison to 127 Hours; no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke and speculates about a scene without giving an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke speculating about a scene; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Jokes about a hypothetical scene without evaluating the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Joking comparison to 127 Hours and speculation about content; no clear judgement of Whalefall's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke/speculation about the plot and does not express a verdict on the film. | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #10 w 0.302 I mean, that is the book. I’ve not seen it; is it bad? VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.542 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.29 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.72 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — They explicitly haven't seen the film and ask whether it's bad without expressing their own judgment. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film; references the book and asks whether it's bad. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film, only references the book and asks whether the movie is bad; no verdict given. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter explicitly states they have not seen the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Commenter has not seen the film and asks if it is bad. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They explicitly say they have not seen it and ask whether it is bad. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter says they haven't seen the film and asks whether it's bad; no judgement of the film given. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter has not seen the film and asks if it is bad. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #11 w 0.289 I kinda loved it actually. I recommend it! Way better than Street Fighter. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.872 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — They explicitly say they loved the film and recommend it. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter says they loved it, recommends it, and ranks it above another film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they loved the film, explicitly recommends it, and compares it favorably to another movie. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the film and recommends it. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved it and explicitly recommends it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly say they loved it and recommend it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they 'kinda loved it' and explicitly recommends the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved it and recommends it. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #12 w 0.277 It changes almost nothing from the book beyond streamlining a bit of the flashback sequences for time. If you enjoyed the book, then you'll like the movie. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.7 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.24 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.90 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Recommends the movie to fans of the book, praising its faithfulness to the source. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes faithfulness to the book; the recommendation is conditional on liking the book, with no personal judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Recommends the film to book fans, saying it stays faithful and they'll like it; implicit endorsement of the adaptation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the film as a faithful adaptation and recommends it to fans of the book. Grok 4.7: positive — Says book fans will like the faithful movie adaptation. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Recommends the movie to people who enjoyed the book, suggesting it preserves what made the book appealing. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says if you liked the book you'll like the movie, implying a favorable recommendation of the adaptation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — States that book fans will like the movie, implying a recommendation. | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #13 w 0.267 For such a dumb silly premise I didn’t expect it to be so sentimental, and, above all else, so beautifully shot at times. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.674 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.70 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film’s unexpected sentimentality and beautiful cinematography despite finding its premise silly. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Pleasantly surprised by the film's sentimentality and beautiful cinematography despite its silly premise. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Despite calling the premise dumb, they were pleasantly surprised by its sentimentality and praise it as beautifully shot, implying an overall favorable verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the film for being unexpectedly sentimental and beautifully shot despite a silly premise. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises unexpected sentiment and beautiful shots despite silly premise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Despite calling the premise silly, they praise the film’s sentimentality and beautiful cinematography. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter was pleasantly surprised by the sentimentality and praises the beautiful shots, leaning favorable despite the 'dumb premise' jab. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film for being surprisingly sentimental and beautifully shot. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #14 w 0.258 The entire scene with the orcas was so pretty and mesmerizing. Straight out of Avatar’s Pandora. I was thinking earlier today how it must be like navigating the ocean with no light and then they showed exactly that, loved it. You’re just swimming and then you get randomly… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.9 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.81 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the orca scene as pretty and mesmerizing, explicitly saying they loved it; terrifying describes its impact. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the orca scene as pretty, mesmerizing, and loved; calling it terrifying is praise, not criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the orca scene as pretty, mesmerizing, and says they loved the dark ocean depiction; 'terrifying' is admiration of the scene. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they 'loved it' and praises a scene as 'pretty and mesmerizing' and effectively 'terrifying'. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the orca scene as pretty, mesmerizing, and loved the depiction. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They loved the mesmerizing orca scene and describe it as visually striking. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the orca scene as pretty, mesmerizing, and says 'loved it', despite calling it terrifying. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the scene and praises the film's visuals. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #15 w 0.25 The orca pod attacking a bull sperm whale is surprisingly the most unrealistic part of the entire movie. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.202 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.94 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.69 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the film’s realism, specifically the orca attack on a bull sperm whale. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on one scene's realism without giving an overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on realism of one plot element in a joking/trivia way; no overall judgment of whether the film is good. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke/observation about marine biology realism without expressing an overall opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Notes one scene's realism without judging the film overall. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize a major scene as unrealistic, expressing a negative judgment of the film’s plausibility. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Calls the orca attack scene the most unrealistic part of the entire movie, implying a critical judgement of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot realism without expressing a clear verdict on the film itself. | − | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − | 0 |
| thread #16 w 0.243 It reminded me of my dad and I’s relationship so I was trying hard to hide my tears lol VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.273 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.43 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — The film resonated personally with their father relationship and moved them to tears, implying appreciation. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Film moved them to tears by resonating with their own father relationship, implying an affecting, positive experience. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Film emotionally resonated and moved them to tears, implying a favorable personal response, though no explicit recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter felt a strong, moving emotional connection to the film, bringing them to tears. Grok 4.7: positive — Emotionally moved to tears by the film’s father-son resonance. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The film moved them to tears and resonated with their relationship with their father. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says the film resonated personally and moved them to tears, implying an emotionally positive response to it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Strong emotional connection to the film indicates a positive verdict. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #17 w 0.236 I saw it with my brother’s kid, who died a few years ago. So my nephew and I always reference movies like this as “Dead dad movies”. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.273 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.34 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.75 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Shares a personal association and nickname for this type of movie without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Personal anecdote and genre label; no judgment of the film's quality expressed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Personal anecdote and a joking label for the film's genre; no clear judgment of whether the film was good or bad. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter shares a personal anecdote and categorizes the film's trope without expressing an opinion on its quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Personal anecdote and genre label, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Shares personal context and a nickname for movies, but gives no opinion of this film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Personal anecdote about viewing with a nephew; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment shares a personal anecdote and joke without expressing any opinion about the film. | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #18 w 0.229 Men will literally dive into a whale rather than go to therapy. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.34 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A joke about the premise, without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — A joke about the premise that doesn't say whether the commenter liked or disliked the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke about the plot (man diving into a whale) with no judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a joke about the premise with no judgment on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about the premise, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about the premise, with no judgment of the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about plot events and characters, with no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — A popular joke/meme comment about the premise, not a film review. | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #19 w 0.224 Seriously I know he was grieving but how do you possibly think you're going to find your father's in tact body more than a week later in the Pacific ocean? Dude was asking for something to go wrong. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.768 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.17 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.84 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Questions the character's judgment and plausibility of his goal without expressing an overall opinion of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Critiques the character's decision, not the film itself; no judgement of the movie's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter questions the protagonist's plot decisions and logic, not offering a judgment of the film's quality or a recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only questions a character's decision-making within the plot without judging the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Questions character logic; no judgement of the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Criticizes the character’s decision-making, not the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Critiques a character's decision in the plot, not the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the plot and character's foolish actions, indicating a negative view of the film's writing. | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #20 w 0.218 It wasn’t a week. It was a year later! I don’t know how body’s decompose in that kind of water but no way was he finding him. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.475 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.34 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.35 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses the plot timeline and plausibility of finding a body without judging the film overall. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses the plot timeline and body decomposition realism without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment discusses plot realism and timeline details without giving an overall judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses plot details and realism without giving an overall opinion or verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot logic nitpick only; no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film’s plot as implausible, saying the character could not have found him. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment questions a plot detail about timing and decomposition; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the plot logic regarding body decomposition. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | − |
| thread #21 w 0.213 I dont think he was thinking or really wanted to find the body. It was his way to deal with grief and use what his dad taught him to sort of connect with him like he never got too VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.178 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.07 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.86 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Interprets the character’s motivations and grief without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Interprets the character's motivation and grief; offers no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Interpretation of the protagonist's motivation and grief; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment purely discusses the plot and character motivation without expressing any opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character-motivation theory only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Interprets the character’s motivation and grief without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Interprets a character's motivation and grief themes; does not judge whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot motivations and character psychology without expressing any opinion on the film itself. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #22 w 0.209 Yeah, but what if the whale is your dad? VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.153 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.11 P(pos)=0.37 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.30 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A joke about the whale, with no judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke or plot remark about the whale; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joking or speculative remark about the plot, with no judgement of the film's quality or any recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a joke referencing the premise/themes without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke or theory with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about the premise, with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — A joke/speculative quip about plot elements with no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — A joke comment, no judgment of the film. | + | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #23 w 0.204 The whale is always your dad. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.54 P(pos)=0.86 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A thematic remark or joke, with no judgment of the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke or thematic observation about the whale symbolism; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A cryptic thematic remark or joke about the film's symbolism, with no judgment of whether the film was good or bad. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Joke or thematic observation without a judgment on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke or thematic quip with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke or plot-related remark without an opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Cryptic remark about the film's symbolism; no clear judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Plot or thematic comment without any judgment of the film itself. | 0 | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #24 w 0.2 Thoughts from someone who read the book in no particular order: -I think they went light on the dad. In the book he is so much more of a self destructive asshole that drags Jay down with him. It's much more understandable why Jay left and was distant even as his dad was dying… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.291 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.61 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls it enjoyable and rates it 7/10, praising scenes and adaptation choices despite some criticisms. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Notes some softened elements versus the book but praises scenes and rates it an enjoyable 7/10. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Despite book-comparison critiques, they conclude 'enjoyable 7/10 movie', praise the sonar scene and hallucinations; leans positive overall. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Despite noting toned-down book elements, the commenter explicitly concludes it is an enjoyable 7/10 movie. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it an enjoyable 7/10 despite adaptation quibbles. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it an enjoyable 7/10 and praises scenes, despite wishing some book elements were stronger. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Compares to the book with several criticisms, but concludes it's an enjoyable 7/10 movie worth watching. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls it an "enjoyable 7/10 movie" despite some book-to-film differences. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #25 w 0.196 This movie was literally scarier than other mommy lol VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.421 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.47 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calling the movie scarier than another horror film implies praise for its effectiveness. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls the film scarier than Coraline's Other Mother, which is praise of its scariness. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says the film was scarier than another movie ('other mommy' likely Coraline), which reads as praise for its effectiveness, though not explicit. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Describing a survival thriller as genuinely scary is praise for the film's tension and effectiveness. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the film scarier than another, praising its scare factor. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calling the movie scarier than the Other Mother praises its effectiveness as a scary film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says the film was scarier than another movie, a playful endorsement of its scariness. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Comparing it favorably as scarier indicates praise for the horror elements. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #26 w 0.192 It was the first time I've been in the theater post covid where I actually heard people gasp and like grown and disgust out loud. Like that's what movie theater experience should be I was so happy VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.704 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.73 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.66 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — They loved the visceral audience reactions and were happy with the theatrical experience. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter loved the visceral audience reactions and was happy with the theater experience the film delivered. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter was thrilled by the visceral audience reactions, calling it what the theater experience should be and saying they were very happy. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praised the visceral audience reactions and stated they were 'so happy' with the theater experience. Grok 4.7: positive — Happy the film provoked gasps and disgust; praises the experience. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the movie theater experience and say the audience’s reactions made them happy. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter delighted by audible gasps and disgust in theater, saying that's what the experience should be; enjoyed the film's shock value. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter expresses high satisfaction and praises the theatrical experience, indicating they liked the film. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #27 w 0.189 God that second whale stomach or chamber felt like it could be from some kind of cosmic horror Cthulhu monster VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.557 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.64 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.68 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes the whale chamber’s cosmic horror imagery without expressing approval or criticism of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes the eerie whale chamber scene vividly, but gives no explicit judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a scene's cosmic-horror atmosphere without explicitly praising or criticizing the film; it's an observation, not a clear verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes a specific setting/scene from the film without expressing an overall opinion on the movie's quality. Grok 4.7: positive — Awed reaction to the chamber’s cosmic-horror intensity, praising the scare. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes the whale chamber as cosmic-horror-like without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a scene's cosmic-horror feel without any judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a specific scene's horror elements without giving an overall verdict on the film. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #28 w 0.186 I only saw the movie, and i was surprised by how much of a body horror film it was for not being a body horror film. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.226 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.60 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Expresses surprise at the body horror elements without indicating whether they liked or disliked the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Notes surprise at the body horror elements but gives no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes surprise at the body horror content but gives no clear judgment on whether the film was good or bad. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter notes the film's unexpected body horror elements without expressing whether they liked or disliked the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Notes unexpected body-horror tone without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They describe the film’s body-horror elements but don’t say whether they liked it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes the film's content and genre surprise but gives no clear judgement of whether they liked it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses the film's genre elements without expressing a clear like, dislike, or recommendation. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #29 w 0.183 I’ve been above the deep sea and I’m a god awful swimmer. The real ocean is much more beautiful and lively in the shallow area. There are much more beautiful tropical fishes swimming about than in the movie. Plus, nothing is scarier than already seeing a dark bottomless pit in… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.846 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.32 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Shares personal ocean experiences and compares marine life without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Personal ocean anecdote comparing real sea life to the movie's; no clear judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Shares personal ocean experience and compares it to the movie's visuals, but gives no clear judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter shares personal ocean swimming anecdotes and compares real sea life to the movie without giving an overall verdict. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Personal ocean anecdote; no overall like or dislike of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They say the real ocean is more beautiful and lively than its depiction in the movie, criticizing its visuals. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER 0.846 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses real-life ocean experiences rather than judging the film itself. | + | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #30 w 0.18 Seeing the movie in like 20 mins but definitely reading the book after 👀 I’m intrigued lol VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.84 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.59 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.62 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — They haven't seen the movie yet; intrigue and plans to read the book don't judge the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film yet; only expresses anticipation and intent to read the book. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Hasn't seen the film yet; only expresses interest in reading the book, so no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter states they have not seen the movie yet. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Hasn't seen the film yet; only intrigued. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They have not seen the movie yet; intrigue and plans to read the book do not judge the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film yet and only expresses intent to watch and read the book; no judgement of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Has not seen the movie yet, expresses anticipation only. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #31 w 0.177 I Don't Know What I Expected: The Movie VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.42 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.37 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — The mock title conveys bemusement and implied disappointment rather than praise. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Meme-style joke about the premise or predictability; no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Joke-style title quip with no clear judgment of whether the film was good or bad. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — A joke/meme comment that does not state whether the commenter liked or disliked the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke title with no clear like or dislike of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A title-like joke with no clear judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a vague title-style quip with no clear judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — A meme quote expressing uncertainty, not a clear judgment of the film. | 0 | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #32 w 0.174 I Do, And That's Why I'm Not Going: 2 Whale 2 Fall VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.36 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.49 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A joke about not going and a sequel title, without evaluating the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke comment about a hypothetical sequel title; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke playing on the title ("2 Whale 2 Fall"); the commenter says they aren't going to see it, so there's no verdict on the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a joke about the title and states they have not seen the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Pun about not going; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A pun about not going; it gives no clear opinion of the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — A title-style joke or pun about the film; no judgement of the film itself is expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — A joke comment referencing a sequel title without expressing a clear opinion on the film. | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #33 w 0.171 Man it got to a point I wished Austin Abrams was back in Raccoon City because this was more brutal for his character. He is an incredible actor. The screams when being swallowed and the crying scene when rescued was incredible acting. IMO he’s now up there with some of the… VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.008 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.74 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Enthusiastically praises Abrams’s performance and highlights two scenes as examples of incredible acting. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the brutal, intense scenes and the lead's incredible acting; the darkness is framed as a strength. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the lead's acting as incredible, singling out the screaming and crying scenes, and ranks him with top actors of his generation. Brutality is framed as a feature, not a flaw. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Strongly praises the lead actor's incredible performance and the effective brutality of his character's ordeal. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the brutal scenes and calls the acting incredible. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises the film’s performance and emotionally intense scenes as incredible. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the brutal content as incredible and lavishly praises the lead actor's performance, implying a strong endorsement of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the intense brutality of the film and highlights the incredible acting performances. | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #34 w 0.169 man knows how to let loose an uncontrollable, unconscious, pure reflex scream VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.586 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.44 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes someone's screaming ability without judging the film or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Admires the actor's convincing, raw scream, implicitly praising the performance. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a character's scream in a scene without clearly judging the film itself; ambiguous, no explicit like or dislike. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the actor's authentic and convincing screaming performance. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Brief remark on a scream, no overall film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Admiring the film’s scream performance conveys praise for the scene. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the film's scream performance as impressive and effective; the admiring tone signals approval of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a specific scene reaction without judging the film overall. | − | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | 0 |
| thread #35 w 0.167 Saw someone in this thread compare it to Shia LaBeouf screaming when he was on Even Steven. Very accurate imo VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.382 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.82 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Agrees with a humorous comparison about screaming, without clearly judging the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Agrees with a joking comparison to Shia LaBeouf screaming; no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Agrees with a mocking comparison of the film's screaming to Shia LaBeouf on Even Stevens, implying unintentional humor and a criticism of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a humorous comparison to an actor screaming without expressing a clear verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Agrees a meme comparison is accurate; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Agrees with a comparison to Shia LaBeouf’s screaming, but gives no judgment of the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Mocking comparison of a performance to Shia LaBeouf screaming implies the commenter found the acting bad, a negative judgement of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Comparing the acting to a bad comedic scream implies the film is ridiculous and poor quality. | − | + | − | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − |
| thread #36 w 0.164 I don’t think anyone in my theatre really knew what to expect for the actual whale swallowing scene…but damn with the way the theatre went dead silent as he was screaming for his life, it wasn’t that. It was way more brutal/haunting than I’d imagined, especially since the… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.625 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Expresses impressed appreciation for the swallowing scene’s unexpectedly brutal, haunting impact and the theatre’s stunned silence. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the whale scene as brutal and haunting and notes the silenced theatre, implying it was effective. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the swallowing scene as brutal and haunting, with the theatre gripped in silence; no criticism of the film, so the lean is positive. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises a key scene for being effectively brutal and haunting, leaving the entire theater dead silent. Grok 4.7: positive — Impressed the whale scene was more brutal and haunting than expected. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They describe the whale scene as more brutal and haunting than expected, expressing appreciation for its impact. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the whale scene as more brutal and haunting than expected, with a silent theatre reaction; no criticism of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the brutal and haunting scene, comparing it favorably to previous work. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #37 w 0.162 I agree and at the end with his hair shaved short I thought he looked almost identical to Timothee Chalamet VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.361 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.54 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.38 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — The comment compares an actor’s appearance to Timothee Chalamet without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comment about the actor's resemblance to Timothee Chalamet; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment only notes an actor's resemblance to Timothee Chalamet; it gives no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only remarks on an actor's physical resemblance to Timothée Chalamet without judging the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Actor resemblance remark only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on the actor’s resemblance to Timothée Chalamet, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment notes a resemblance to an actor about a character's look; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses character appearance and resemblance to an actor without judging the film. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #38 w 0.16 I think people should really appreciate and watch movies within their own context and the moment they were made. Whalefall is a solid 7 movie but this movie alone deserves more just for the technical achievement that it is. People should appreciate more all the work behind… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.386 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.47 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls it a solid seven, praises technical achievements and acting, and explicitly says its highs outweigh its lows. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a solid 7 deserving more, praises technical work and acting; screenplay flaw is minor. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it a solid 7 deserving more, praises technical work and acting; notes screenplay weakness but says highs outweigh lows. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Rates it a solid 7+ and strongly praises the technical achievements, acting, and direction despite minor screenplay flaws. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a solid 7 deserving more; praises highs despite screenplay weakness. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it a solid 7, praises its technical craft and acting, and says its highs are remarkable despite screenplay weakness. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER -0.386 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls it a solid 7, praises its technical achievements and acting, and highlights its highs. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #39 w 0.158 Yesss this movie is such a technical achievement. It must have been incredibly difficult to film for everyone on set. The cold, the dark, the damp, the elaborate sets, the uncomfortable costumes.. it really immerses you in the character's struggle and feels so real. There were… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.84 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.56 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the technical achievement, immersive realism, and impressive sequences; audience concerns do not diminish their appreciation. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises technical achievement, immersion, impressive sequences; audience concerns are about box office, not their own opinion. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the film as a technical achievement with immersive, impressive sequences; concerns about audience reach aren't criticism of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the film as an immersive, realistic technical achievement with impressive sequences, despite noting its niche audience appeal. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises technical achievement, immersion, and sequences; audience concerns aren't a personal pan. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Strongly praises the film’s technical achievement, immersion, and sequences; predicts limited appeal but hopes the filmmakers are proud. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.84 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film as a technical achievement with impressive sequences and hopes filmmakers are proud. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #40 w 0.156 Everything involving the whale and Abram’s attempts to escape is thrilling and sounds incredible in a theater, but the family drama is boring as hell and I nearly fell asleep every time it cut to a flashback. I just didn’t care about what was going on with those scenes. Cut out… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.832 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.70 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): mixed — Praises the thrilling whale escape sequences and theatrical sound, but finds the family drama and flashbacks boring and disengaging. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Praises thrilling whale escape scenes but finds family drama flashbacks boring; no clear overall lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Praises the thrilling whale escape sequences and sound, but calls the family-drama flashbacks boring; clear praise and criticism with no overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Praises the thrilling survival and sound design, but strongly criticizes the boring family drama flashbacks, with no clear overall lean. Grok 4.7: mixed — Praises the escape sequences but strongly criticizes the boring family drama. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They praise the escape sequences but find the flashbacks boring and disengaging, leaving the film as a whole disappointing. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.832 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Thrilling whale scenes praised, but the family flashbacks are heavily criticized as boring. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − | 0 |
| thread #41 w 0.154 There’s only so much you can do while inside the stomach of a whale, at least if they’re attempting to make it somewhat realistic. I didn’t mind the family stuff. I kinda related to it actually so I’m surprised people find it to be bullshit mindless filler or whatever. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.673 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.75 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Defends the film’s limitations and family storyline, finding the latter relatable rather than pointless filler. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Defends the film's limitations and family subplot, says they related to it; leans favorable. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Defends the film's limited setting and says they related to the family elements, implying a favorable view despite others' criticism. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter defends the film's family subplots against criticism and found them relatable. Grok 4.7: positive — Defends the film and relates to the family material. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They related to and didn’t mind the family material, defending it against criticism as filler. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER -0.673 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter defended the family elements and found them relatable, indicating an overall favorable view. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #42 w 0.152 I usually find these family flashbacks in action movies pretty cliche but here I think it was done pretty well, it did feel like the two stories merged together in a satisfying way towards the end. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.935 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.80 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the flashbacks’ execution and finds the merging storylines satisfying. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the family flashbacks as well done and the merging storylines as satisfying, despite usually disliking the trope. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the family flashbacks as well done and the two storylines merging satisfyingly, despite usually finding such devices cliche. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the execution of the flashbacks and finds the merging of the stories satisfying. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the flashbacks and satisfying story merge despite usual cliches. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the flashbacks as well done and say the stories merge satisfyingly. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says the flashbacks were done well and the stories merged satisfyingly, overriding their usual cliché complaint. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the film's execution as satisfying and done pretty well. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #43 w 0.151 I'm the opposite lol. I wanted more of the family dynamics. The father-son relationship, imo, is what made the book so compelling and different from a generic survival thriller. It gave it depth and more gravitas than a typical man vs. nature story. Sounds like you wanted a… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.964 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.38 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.47 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly says they really liked the movie and appreciates its father-son relationship and emotional depth. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter explicitly says they really liked the movie, though they wanted more family dynamics. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they loved the book and really liked the movie, though they wanted more family dynamics; overall favorable. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they 'really liked the movie' despite wishing for a bit more of the family dynamics. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly says they really liked the movie. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly say they really liked the movie, praising its family dynamics and emotional depth. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.964 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they 'really liked the movie'. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #44 w 0.149 “Where is my aura and hype moments? why is there so much talk slop??” ahh comment VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.73 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.71 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Mocks another comment’s expectations without expressing a clear judgment of the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke mocking hypothetical critics' complaints; gives no clear judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — The comment mocks another commenter's complaint without clearly judging the film. It could imply a defense of the movie, but it states no verdict itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is mocking another commenter and expresses no direct opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Mocks another viewer's complaint; no personal judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — This mocks another comment and does not express an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Mocks the film's dialogue and pacing as 'talk slop' and complains it lacks hype moments, implying dissatisfaction. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a meme quote mocking other commenters, not a review or verdict on the film. | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 |
| thread #45 w 0.147 That’s why I thought the book fucking sucked. Disappointing to see that it ruins the movie too VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.865 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Says the book's problems ruin the movie too, expressing disappointment in the film. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Says the same flaw that made the book suck also ruins the movie, a clear negative verdict on the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Says the book sucked and is disappointed that the same flaw ruins the movie too, which is a negative verdict on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter states the flaw from the book 'ruins the movie too' and calls it disappointing. Grok 4.7: negative — Says the book’s flaws ruin the movie too, expressing disappointment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They say the movie is ruined by the same issue that made them dislike the book. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter says the book sucked and that the film is ruined too, clearly disappointed with the movie. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter states the book sucked and expresses disappointment that it ruins the movie too. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #46 w 0.146 Then that's a completely different movie VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.61 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.32 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Says it would be a different movie without expressing approval or criticism of this film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Reply about a hypothetical alternative version; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Ambiguous remark about it being a different movie, likely about the book or a plot point; no clear judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a brief observation without expressing an opinion or judgment on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — No judgment of the film; just a reply about a different movie. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A brief reaction to a hypothetical or alternate movie, with no judgment of Whalefall itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment only notes a difference from something else; it gives no judgement of Whalefall's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Plot or concept discussion without a judgment on the film itself. | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #47 w 0.144 As someone with pretty extreme claustrophobia, I don't think I could have taken 70 consecutive minutes of Jay trapped in the whale. Having it broken up the way it did gave me a lot of relief and allowed me to stay and watch the whole thing through. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.052 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.36 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film’s structure for relieving claustrophobic tension and making the entire viewing manageable. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Appreciates the film's structure for making it watchable; implies engagement and approval, no criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter praises the film's structure for making it bearable and says it let them watch the whole thing through, implying a favorable view. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter appreciates the pacing and structure, which relieved their claustrophobia and allowed them to finish the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Notes structure eased claustrophobia; no like or dislike of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They appreciate how the film breaks up the claustrophobic sequence, letting them watch it through. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says the structure let them stay and watch the whole film, implying they valued the experience despite claustrophobia. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter stayed to watch the whole thing and appreciated the pacing. | − | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | + |
| thread #48 w 0.143 The letter at the end was like, "don't look for my body." VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.361 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.60 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.41 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Paraphrases the ending's letter without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Only recounts a plot detail about the ending letter; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment only references a plot detail (the letter at the end) without expressing any judgment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely references a plot detail or quote from the ending without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Quotes an ending letter without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Mentions a detail from the ending without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a plot detail (a letter at the end) without any judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Just quoting the movie, no judgement on the film itself. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #49 w 0.141 "I made a pact with my friend, another boat is coming by and taking me to Cuba. Don't look for me, take care of your mother. And remember the trick to blowing up a whale from the inside." VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.735 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.40 P(pos)=0.02 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — The comment quotes dialogue without expressing any judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke riffing on a quoted line from the film; no judgement of the movie's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke or quote-style comment about plot elements, with no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a joke or fictional quote about the premise without offering any judgement on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Quote or joke with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A quoted line with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Only quotes a line from the film with no judgement of whether the commenter liked it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only quotes a line from the film without expressing any opinion. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #50 w 0.14 I was picturing it saying something like, "soft lungs!" Just one last bullying quip. I would've laughed my ass off. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.493 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.46 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Imagines a humorous alternative line without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke imagining an alternate line; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Joking about an imagined alternate line; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke about a hypothetical line of dialogue without evaluating the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about an imagined line, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They joke about an imagined line but give no judgment of the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment riffs on a hypothetical line of dialogue and a joke; it does not judge whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is just making a joke about a hypothetical scene, not judging the film. | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #51 w 0.139 “Dear Son, Iowa! HAHA With regards, Dad PS: whales, bro” VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.616 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.17 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.36 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — The comment is a joke or quote without any judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke or quote referencing the film; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke or quote referencing the film with no judgment of its quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a joke or comedic paraphrase of a plot point without any judgement on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke letter parody with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joking quote with no opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Only quotes a line from the film with a joke; no judgement of the film itself expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Just a quote or joke from the comment, no opinion on the film. | + | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #52 w 0.137 Maybe I'm just easily entertained but I liked this movie a lot more than the internet made me believe I would. Not the best movie I've ever seen, but most movies aren't VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.177 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.92 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.82 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly liked the movie a lot, despite acknowledging it wasn't the best they've seen. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter liked it more than expected; mild caveat but overall clearly positive. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter liked the movie a lot more than expected; the caveat that it's not the best ever is mild, overall leaning positive. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they liked the movie a lot more than expected. Grok 4.7: positive — Liked it more than expected despite not calling it the best. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say they liked the movie a lot, despite modest expectations and noting it isn't the best ever. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they liked the movie much more than expected, despite not calling it the best. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states they liked the movie a lot more than expected. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #53 w 0.136 I usually try to avoid the new movie discussions on this sub now because everyone's always so negative. They ignore all the good stuff and focus on the few things they thought were bad/dumb and it gets exhausting. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.852 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.83 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticizes negativity in movie discussions generally, without expressing a verdict on this film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Complains about the subreddit's negativity; gives no judgement of Whalefall itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment complains about the sub's negativity in general and gives no opinion on Whalefall itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment complains about the subreddit's general negativity rather than offering a specific verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Complains about discussion negativity, not the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They criticize the negativity of movie discussions generally without expressing an opinion about Whalefall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter complains about the subreddit's negativity in general, without giving their own verdict on Whalefall. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses the subreddit's negativity towards movies rather than giving a verdict on 'Whalefall'. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #54 w 0.135 Austin Abrams faces a problem- movie flashbacks to a scene where his dad yells the EXACT same solution to getting out of said situation. Should’ve been a survival thriller instead of a family drama. I can see this format working as a novel but translated to film it really does… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.166 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.98 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the repetitive flashbacks and family drama focus, explicitly saying the format does not work on film. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes repetitive flashback structure and says the format really does not work on film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's flashback-driven family drama format and says it doesn't work on screen; should have been a survival thriller. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the repetitive flashback structure and explicitly states that the format does not work as a film. Grok 4.7: negative — Says the film format does not work and should have been a thriller. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They say the film’s format does not work and criticize its choice of family drama over survival thriller. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter criticizes the film's format and says it should have been different; translation to film 'really does not work'. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter states it should have been a different genre and 'translated to film it really does not work'. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #55 w 0.134 Slumwhale Millionaire? VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.58 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A pun on another movie title, with no judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Pun on Slumdog Millionaire; a joke with no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A short joke playing on the title 'Slumdog Millionaire'; it gives no judgement of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a joke comparing the title/concept to another movie, offering no opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Title pun only; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke combining the film’s title with Slumdog Millionaire; it expresses no opinion of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Short joke/pun referencing a character or title with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — A joke or pun referencing the title without expressing any opinion on the film. | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #56 w 0.132 It did not work as a novel. Honestly, one of the worst books I’ve ever read and I read a lot. The book felt very angsty in a bad YA kinda way. I was SHOCKED when its author went on to win a Pulitzer for his next book. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.368 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.86 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.85 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticizes the novel and discusses its author, without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Criticizes only the source novel and its author, not the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Criticizes the source novel, not the film adaptation; no judgment of the movie itself is given. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only criticizes the source novel and author, making no judgment on the film adaptation itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Criticizes the novel, not the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter criticizes the novel and its author’s later award, not the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.368 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter calls it one of the worst books they have ever read. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − |
| thread #57 w 0.131 I spent a lot of this film thinking about what the Whale must be thinking with everything going on inside of its throat and stomach. “That’s a spicy squid” I didn’t think squids could hold such a personal grudge like this one did. It also doesn’t matter where you go or what… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.765 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.93 P(pos)=0.98 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Expresses enjoyment of the whale gang-warfare element, with no criticism of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Mostly jokes, but explicitly says they enjoyed the whale gang warfare; lightly positive overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — VADER 0.765 Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Mostly humorous plot observations, but the commenter explicitly states they enjoyed the whale warfare aspect. Grok 4.7: positive — Playful plot jokes, but explicitly enjoyed the whale gang-warfare turn. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly say they enjoyed the whale gang-warfare sequence, with no clear criticism of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter enjoys the film's gang warfare and blood, joking throughout with apparent approval of its wild premise and tone. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states 'I did enjoy how it became gang warfare', indicating a positive verdict. | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #58 w 0.13 the squid fight was awesome and the way his hands start burning from the whale's stomach acid was brutal. rest of the movie kind of fell flat for me, but either way austin abrams is super fun to watch on screen. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.911 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.80 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): mixed — Praises the squid fight and Abrams’s performance, but finds the rest of the movie flat. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Praises the squid fight, the acid scene and Abrams, but says the rest fell flat; no clear overall lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Praises the squid fight, the brutal acid scene and Austin Abrams, but says the rest of the movie fell flat. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Praised specific scenes and the lead actor, but felt the rest of the movie fell flat. Grok 4.7: mixed — Praises key scenes but says the rest of the movie fell flat. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They praise the squid fight and Austin Abrams, but say the rest of the movie fell flat. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — Praises the squid fight, gore, and lead actor, but says the rest fell flat; no clear overall lean. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praises specific scenes and actor, but says the rest of the movie fell flat. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #59 w 0.129 With movies like this, I like to pretend I’m in this situation and figure out where it’d be over for me. I can truthfully say I’d have been a goner when Jay hits the first wave before he dives. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.758 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.94 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes imagining personal survival in the film’s scenario without evaluating the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Personal hypothetical about surviving the scenario; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter imagines themselves in the protagonist's situation and jokes about surviving; no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter jokes about how they would fare in the movie's plot scenario without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Hypothetical survival reaction to the plot, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They imagine being in the character’s situation but give no opinion of the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter speculates about survival in the scenario and discusses a scene; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing a hypothetical scenario rather than giving a verdict on the film. | + | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #60 w 0.128 This genuinely made me laugh out loud VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.557 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.27 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.34 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Genuine laughter indicates enjoyment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Laughter could be a reply to a joke or mockery; there's no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says it genuinely made them laugh out loud, which reads as appreciative of the film, though the context is slightly ambiguous. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Reaction to another comment or a specific joke without giving an overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Laughing out loud shows they enjoyed the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say the movie genuinely made them laugh, expressing enjoyment. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says the film made them laugh out loud, a clear enjoyment signal implying a favorable verdict. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a reaction to a specific moment with no overall judgment of the film. | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #61 w 0.127 Austin Abrams and Josh Brolin are a great pairing here. I feel like I got what I paid for so I’m content. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.765 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.64 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.47 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the lead pairing and expresses satisfaction with the film and its value. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the lead pairing and says they got their money's worth and are content. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the lead pairing as great and says they got what they paid for and are content, indicating overall satisfaction. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the lead pairing and expresses satisfaction, feeling they got their money's worth. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the cast pairing and says the film was worth the price. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises the casting and says they got what they paid for, indicating satisfaction. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the cast pairing and says they got what they paid for, feeling content with it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter enjoyed the pairing and feels content, stating they got what they paid for. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #62 w 0.126 They had chemistry from Brolin repeatedly tossing him around a room last year VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.36 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Jokes about the actors’ prior on-screen interaction without judging this film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about the actors' prior on-screen interaction; no judgement of this film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke about actors' chemistry referencing a prior film; no judgement of Whalefall itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Joke referencing the actors' previous work together without expressing a verdict on this film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about prior Brolin scene, no judgment of this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joking reference to actor chemistry and a past scene, with no judgment of Whalefall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment mentions a trivia-like detail about on-set chemistry, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke about actor chemistry unrelated to the film's quality. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #63 w 0.125 Oh my fucking God I forgot about that hahahahahha VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.338 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.23 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.44 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Laughing about a remembered detail does not express a judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Laughing reaction to a remembered moment; no evaluation of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment is a laughing reaction to a remembered moment, with no judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment reacts with laughter to something remembered, offering no evaluation or opinion of the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Laughing reaction to a forgotten detail, no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A humorous reaction to remembering something, with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Reaction to a remembered moment with no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Just a reaction to a remembered moment, no evaluation of the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #64 w 0.124 Wanted to highlight one of my favorite effects shots, which was the deep sea echolocation. It's really neat to get an idea of what it might be like to possess that ability. Also fuck orcas man. So glad we're not on the menu...for now VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.916 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.83 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.38 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the echolocation effects shot as a favorite and really neat; hostility toward orcas isn't film criticism. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises a favorite effects shot as really neat; the orca jab is a joke, not film criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Highlights a favorite effects shot and calls the echolocation visuals really neat; the orca remark is just joking, not criticism of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises a specific effects shot as neat and a favorite, showing enjoyment of the film's visuals and depiction of wildlife. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises a favorite effects shot and finds the depiction neat. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the echolocation effect one of their favorites and says it was neat to experience. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the effects shot one of their favorites and finds the echolocation sequence neat, a clear praise of the film's craft. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises a specific visual effect shot and expresses enjoyment of the film's elements. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #65 w 0.123 the underwater scenes look incredible but i keep thinking about the smell inside that whale no way its just clean and empty like in trailer VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.421 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.86 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Comments on trailer visuals and speculates about whale anatomy, without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Reacts to the trailer's visuals and muses on realism; no indication they've seen or judged the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Praises trailer visuals, but the commenter seems not to have seen the film; the rest is speculation about the whale's interior. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter is reacting to the trailer and has not seen the film itself. Grok 4.7: mixed — Praises underwater visuals but criticizes the unrealistically clean whale interior. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They praise the underwater scenes but criticize the whale’s clean, empty depiction as unrealistic. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the underwater visuals as incredible; the whale-smell remark is a realism gripe, not a criticism of the film overall. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses visual effects and a humorous thought about the premise without judging the film. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 |
| thread #66 w 0.122 The book definitely highlights how bad it smells. Book Jay even throws up in his regulator. Obviously in a movie, they wanna be able to show the actors face more and have them see and speak as well. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.077 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.66 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Explains adaptation choices and compares book details without judging the film’s quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Compares book details to the adaptation and explains a filmmaking choice without judging the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Compares book details to film adaptation choices without giving an opinion on whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment compares book details to typical movie adaptation choices without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Compares book details to film adaptation choices, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Compares the book’s details with likely movie staging, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Compares book and movie details about smell and visibility without judging whether the film is good or worth watching. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses book and movie adaptation differences without giving a verdict on the film. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #67 w 0.121 The actual stomach part of the whale was pretty messy. They make a point about the air smelling/being toxic but that’s about it. I’m sure in a life or death situation smell is something you just get over eventually. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.468 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.49 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.57 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses the whale stomach environment and survival realism without clearly judging the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on how the whale stomach and toxic air were depicted, with musing on realism; no judgement of film quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's depiction of the whale stomach as messy and underdeveloped, with no offsetting praise. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely discusses plot details about the whale's stomach without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: negative — Mildly criticizes the whale-stomach scene as messy and underdeveloped. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They discuss the whale-stomach scene’s details and realism without judging the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a plot detail about the whale's stomach and smell without expressing an overall judgement of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes a key scene as messy and questions the logic, indicating disappointment. | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #68 w 0.12 Definitely one where I would recommend reading the book for my background info. I like how they adapted it but I really wish they could have had a voice over of his inner thoughts. They did pretty good with the necessary flashbacks but there's so much more in the book about… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.983 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.88 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Despite adaptation criticisms, they explicitly loved the movie and will recommend it to friends. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Despite minor gripes about cuts and the goggles, they 'fucking loved the movie' and will recommend it. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Despite minor critiques (no voiceover, mask thing), they conclude they 'fucking loved the movie' and will recommend it to friends. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Despite minor adaptation nitpicks, the commenter explicitly states they loved the movie and will recommend it. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the movie despite adaptation quibbles and will recommend it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Despite adaptation criticisms, they say they loved the movie and will recommend it to friends. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Despite many book-comparison complaints, the commenter says they 'fucking loved the movie' and will recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Despite some minor criticisms about adaptations and details, the commenter states they 'fucking loved the movie'. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #69 w 0.12 I haven't read the book but really really enjoyed the film. Definitely adding it to my reading list now. The screams when he's being swallowed were haunting. It reminded me of the people being eaten in Nope. And I totally agree about his haircut at the end, lol. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.954 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.94 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly really enjoyed the film; the haunting screams describe effective horror, not criticism. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says they really enjoyed the film; calling the screams haunting praises its dark content. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they 'really really enjoyed the film', praises the haunting screams, and wants to read the book afterward. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they 'really really enjoyed the film' and praised a haunting scene. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly says they really enjoyed the film; haunting screams are praise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly say they really enjoyed the film; the haunting screams are praise, and they plan to read the book. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they really enjoyed the film and praises its haunting scenes, plus wants to read the book. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they 'really really enjoyed the film' and are adding the book to their reading list. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #70 w 0.119 YES that's what I thought as well. He is an amazing realistic screamer in resident evil too VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.604 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.93 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Praises an actor’s screaming in another film, without judging Whalefall itself. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Agrees with praise and calls the actor an amazing, realistic screamer, implying approval of his performance here. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment praises an actor's screaming in Resident Evil, agreeing with someone else; no judgement of Whalefall itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Praises an actor's screaming ability in another franchise without giving a verdict on this film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Agrees about an actor's screaming, cites Resident Evil, no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on an actor's screaming in Resident Evil, not on Whalefall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment praises an actor's scream in another franchise (Resident Evil), not expressing a verdict on Whalefall itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses an actor's performance in a different film (Resident Evil), not the movie Whalefall. | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #71 w 0.118 I got so much anxiety each time I saw the swallowing scene in trailers and the movie. I keep rooting for him to get away despite knowing he's going into that fucking whale. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.245 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.94 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.41 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes anxiety and rooting for the character during a scene, without judging the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes anxiety and rooting for the character, but never judges the film's quality or says whether they liked it. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes anxiety and emotional engagement with the swallowing scene, but gives no explicit judgement of the film's quality or a recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Expresses strong emotional engagement and effective suspense during a key scene without criticizing the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Anxiety and rooting for the hero show engaged, successful suspense, not criticism. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes anxiety and rooting for the character, but gives no clear judgment of the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Describes intense anxiety and rooting for the character; the visceral reaction reads as praise for the suspenseful scene. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Engaged and emotionally invested in the suspense, indicating they liked the movie. | − | − | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + |
| thread #72 w 0.117 Auditorily excellent in Dolby. Movie’s biggest strength is its sound design and the visceral closeups during the meat (no pun intended) of the second act survival thriller — a genre that I commonly dislike, but which I quite enjoyed here. The father-son trauma motif that took… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.2 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.77 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Enjoyed the survival thriller and praised sound design and closeups, despite finding the father-son trauma motif less successful. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises sound design and second-act survival thriller, enjoyed it; criticizes final act but leans positive overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises sound design and survival thriller section, enjoyed it despite disliking the genre; criticizes the final father-son act, but overall leans positive. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Praises the sound design and second act survival elements, but criticizes the final 30 minutes' father-son trauma motif. Grok 4.7: positive — Enjoyed the survival thriller and sound design; ending motif less successful. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They quite enjoyed the survival thriller and praise its sound design, despite finding the father-son motif less successful. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER -0.2 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praised sound design and survival thriller aspects, but criticized the father-son trauma motif in the final act. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #73 w 0.116 Do SCUBA divers not have flashlights? I was so confused by the need to use bioluminescence for everything. I'm scared of the ocean so I don't know anything about diving, but I just kind of assumed you needed a flashlight to see in the depths. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.421 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.03 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.69 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Questions the diving equipment and bioluminescence logic without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Questions a plot detail about flashlights out of confusion; no overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Asks a question about diving realism and lighting; expresses confusion but gives no overall judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Questions a plot detail about scuba gear without expressing an overall opinion on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Questions a plot detail; no overall judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They question an implausible-seeming diving detail and say the film’s choice confused them. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Questions the film's diving realism and confusion about light sources; no clear overall judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is asking a question about scuba diving logic rather than reviewing the film itself. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #74 w 0.115 I think he just wasn’t too prepared. If he missed the gloves in the rush I’m sure he missed a couple other essentials. Still strange though I agree. Was the light in the stomach acid also bioluminescence or was that creative license you think? VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.527 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.06 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses character preparedness and questions the explanation for stomach lighting without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot details and asks about bioluminescence without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot details and asks a trivia question about the film, without giving any overall judgement of its quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter discusses plot details and character actions without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot logic and creative-license questions, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about plot details and asks a question without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plot details and asks a question about a film detail; no judgement of the film's quality is expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot details and asks a question about the film without expressing a personal verdict. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #75 w 0.115 I understand forgetting the gloves, but I just kinda figured that forgetting a flashlight would be like forgetting the oxygen tank - you just wouldn't be able to see and therefore couldn't dive. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.502 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.10 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.68 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses the plausibility of forgetting diving equipment without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a plot detail about forgetting a flashlight; no overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Questions a plot detail about forgetting a flashlight without giving an overall judgment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Questions a specific plot detail about diving gear without stating an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot-logic nitpick about a flashlight, no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They point out an implausible plot detail: diving without a flashlight would prevent seeing and make the dive impossible. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter discusses a plot detail about forgetting a flashlight versus gloves; no judgement of the film itself expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing a plot logic issue without expressing a judgment on the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #76 w 0.114 Diver here, for a solo dive he was missing a flashlight, a dive computer (must have), possibly a weight belt, an smb, a pocket knife.. and he wanted to go back for the damn gloves🙄.. Also he was using his arms like an idiot.. his dad wasn't hard on him enough, imo. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.66 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.47 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.41 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Critiques the character’s diving equipment and behavior, without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Diver critiques the character's gear and technique in-universe, without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Critiques the protagonist's diving gear and technique from a diver's perspective, but gives no overall verdict on the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Criticizes the character's diving technique and preparation in-universe, without offering an overall judgment on the film itself. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the film’s unrealistic diving portrayal and character handling. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They criticize the diver’s choices and skills but don’t state whether they liked or disliked the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Critiques the character's diving mistakes and father, not the film itself; no verdict on the movie. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the film's inaccurate and poorly researched scuba diving portrayal. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #77 w 0.113 I don't really know anything about scuba diving, but wouldn't Jay have had a diving knife with him? Or if he did have it, did it get lost when the whale swallowed him? VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.404 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.05 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.74 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Asks about a diving knife and plot logistics without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot question about a diving knife; no judgement of the film expressed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Asks a plot-detail question about a diving knife; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter asks a plot-related question without expressing any opinion or verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot question about a diving knife; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a question about plot details and scuba gear without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a plot question about a diving knife; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses plot logistics without expressing a judgment on the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #78 w 0.113 In the book his dad looks down on divers carrying knives because it means they don’t “trust” the ocean. He never allowed his son to carry a knife on dives and the kid maintains the habit. The book weighs on this a fair bit since divers usually carry a knife - there are knives… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.077 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.01 P(pos)=0.02 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses the book’s explanation for diving without a knife, without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Explains a book detail about knives and diving; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a plot detail from the book about the knife and the father's attitude, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only provides plot details from the book without expressing any opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Book plot discussion only; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses the book’s plot and diving details without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses book plot detail and a character's knife habit; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses plot details and book trivia without expressing a personal judgment on the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #79 w 0.112 Almost surprised they didn’t include that given the amount of scenes where he was talking diving and the ocean to him VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.228 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.05 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.44 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses an omitted detail and ocean-related dialogue without judging the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Observation about scene content and an omitted detail; no evaluation of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment observes something seemingly missing from the film, without clearly praising or criticizing it overall; no verdict on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely discusses what was included or excluded in the scenes without evaluating the movie's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Notes an omitted detail; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on what the film included and its dialogue, but gives no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment notes a missing element and references scenes about diving; no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Plot discussion and speculation about movie content without a judgment on the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #80 w 0.111 it was a good movie but it frustrated me as someone who was also abused by my father. i almost walked out because of the yelling, weird rambling, selfishness, and shitty behavior was just too familiar. i despise the trope of "angry abusive parent gets to be abusive and shitty… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.996 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.95 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls it a good movie and enjoyed the ending, despite frustration with its handling of abuse and forgiveness. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a good movie and enjoyed the ending; the criticism of the forgiveness trope is framed largely as personal bias. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Calls it a good movie and enjoyed the ending and effective villain, but is frustrated by the forgiveness trope and wants deeper treatment; leans slightly positive. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Explicitly calls it a 'good movie' and says they 'quite enjoyed' the ending despite frustration with the abusive father trope. Grok 4.7: mixed — Calls it good and likes the ending, but criticizes its abuse-forgiveness themes. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They call it a good movie and enjoy the ending, but strongly criticize its handling of the abusive father. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — VADER -0.996 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praises the movie's quality and ending, but expresses deep frustration and criticism toward its depiction of parental abuse. | − | − | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #81 w 0.11 Same exact boat (pun intended), this movie triggered me unfortunately. Romanticizing abuse so people who havent experienced it can get feelsy is a garbage trope. The audacity to show the dad holding Jay as a baby and outwardly saying "we're going to screw you up 😔" and have it… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.885 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.98 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Despite some enjoyable highlights, they strongly criticize the film’s romanticization of abuse and poorly written father plot. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes abuse romanticization and poor father plot writing; minor highlights don't outweigh strong criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Mostly critical: calls the abuse trope garbage and the father plot poorly written, despite conceding some highlights and enjoying 4DX. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Found it worth checking out and enjoyed it in 4DX, but heavily criticized the writing and romanticizing of abuse. Grok 4.7: mixed — Criticizes abuse trope and writing, but enjoyed highlights and found it worth seeing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Despite enjoying some highlights and the 4DX experience, they strongly criticize the film’s abuse romanticization and father plot. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.885 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Criticizes the abusive romance and poor plot, but also mentions highlights and enjoying it in 4DX. | − | − | − | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | − | − | 0 |
| thread #82 w 0.11 I thought it was fantastic. Abrams puts on a stellar performance to help carry this insane premise. I appreciate it being cuts between the past and the present mostly because I am claustrophobic. I needed a break from being inside the whale lol. It's a real shame though the… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.586 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.82 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls the film fantastic, praises Abrams’s performance, and appreciates the past-present editing. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it fantastic, praises Abrams' stellar performance and the structure; the jellyfish remark is a joke. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says the film was fantastic, praises Abrams' performance and the pacing structure; the jellyfish remark is just a joke. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they thought the movie was fantastic and praises the acting and editing structure. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the film fantastic and praises the lead performance and structure. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the film fantastic and praises Abrams’s performance and the storytelling structure; the jellyfish comment is a joke. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter calls it fantastic and praises the lead performance; the jellyfish remark is a light aside. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states 'I thought it was fantastic' and praises the performance and structure. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #83 w 0.109 Totally agree!! Something about Austin’s panic feels so raw and genuine? Both here and in Resident Evil. Those yelps of his and when he cries after the whale passes, it just touches me deeply idk. Love that lad. He reminded me a lot of Timothee here though lol VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.383 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.09 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.61 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises Austin’s raw, genuine performance in the film and describes being deeply moved by it. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the lead actor's raw, genuine performance and says it touched them deeply; agrees with prior praise. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises Austin's raw, genuine performance and says it touched them deeply; agrees with prior praise and expresses love for the actor. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter strongly praises the lead actor's raw, genuine performance and says the film touched them deeply. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the raw, moving performance and is deeply touched by the scenes. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises Austin’s performance in the film as raw, genuine, and deeply moving. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the actor's performance as raw and genuine, says it touches them deeply, and loves him. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the raw emotion and acting ('touches me deeply', 'Love that lad'). | − | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #84 w 0.108 I enjoyed it, and had a good time but boy o boy claustrophobic as heck! VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.525 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.69 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly enjoyed the film and had a good time; claustrophobia describes the experience, not criticism. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enjoyed it and had a good time; calling it claustrophobic describes its intensity, not a criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they enjoyed it and had a good time; the claustrophobia remark describes the intensity, not a criticism. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they enjoyed the movie and had a good time, finding it effectively claustrophobic. Grok 4.7: positive — Enjoyed it and had a good time; claustrophobia is praise of intensity. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They enjoyed the movie and had a good time; the claustrophobia is described as an experience, not a criticism. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Says they enjoyed it and had a good time; claustrophobia is praised as part of the experience. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly stated they enjoyed the movie and had a good time. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #85 w 0.108 gloriously stupid movie elevated by some excellent claustrophobic bits and beautiful underwater footage. the climax, , was a definite highlight for me. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.912 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Affectionately calls it gloriously stupid, praising claustrophobic sequences, underwater footage, and the climax. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it 'gloriously stupid' affectionately, praises claustrophobic scenes, underwater footage, and the climax; overall lean is positive. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it 'gloriously stupid' but elevated by excellent claustrophobic sequences, beautiful footage, and a climax highlight; leans positive overall. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Enjoyed the movie, praising the claustrophobic elements, underwater footage, and climax despite calling the premise 'gloriously stupid'. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it gloriously stupid but praises footage, tension, and climax. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the claustrophobic scenes, underwater footage, and climax as highlights. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the film 'gloriously stupid' but 'elevated' by strong bits and beautiful footage; climax a highlight, leaning favorable overall. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film as 'gloriously stupid' with excellent bits, beautiful footage, and a great climax. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #86 w 0.107 Book was a lot of nonsense that you had to just go with + a solid father/son trauma story. Movie is same. I love, love, love that Jay was so scared when he got swallowed that he SQUEAKED. Because honestly who wouldn't? Most visceral part was the whale swallowing and his eye… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.803 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.92 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Despite implausibility, praises the visceral scenes, emotional story, and Abrams’s compelling, relatable performance. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Loves specific moments, praises visceral scenes and Austin Abrams' performance; 'nonsense' framed as acceptable, matching the book. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the visceral scenes and Austin Abrams' performance, with enthusiastic 'love, love, love'; the 'nonsense' remark about the book is mild and doesn't undercut the overall approval. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Despite noting the premise requires suspension of disbelief, the commenter praises the story, visceral scenes, and lead performance. Grok 4.7: positive — Loves key moments and the lead, accepting plot nonsense for a solid story. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises the film’s visceral scenes, emotional story, and Austin Abrams’s performance. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Repeated 'love, love, love' and praise for the film's visceral scenes and lead actor's performance indicate a clearly favorable verdict despite the 'nonsense' jab at the story. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the movie's emotional core, visceral scenes, and the lead actor's performance. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #87 w 0.107 Double featured this after Street Fighter and thoroughly enjoyed it. Gets sappy at the end but it worked. I really wish they took creative liberty with the breathing mouthguard though. Like have him only put it on when something happens. Because him mumbling with it on got… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.969 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.88 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly thoroughly enjoyed it; criticisms of muffled dialogue and family reactions do not outweigh the overall praise. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Thoroughly enjoyed it; minor complaints about the mouthguard mumbling and the family's reaction, but overall positive. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says they thoroughly enjoyed it and the sappy ending worked; the criticisms (mouthguard mumbling, chill family) are minor and secondary. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter states they 'thoroughly enjoyed it' despite some minor nitpicks about the mouthguard and ending. Grok 4.7: positive — Thoroughly enjoyed it; specific flaws noted but ending still worked. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They thoroughly enjoyed it; the mouthguard and family reactions were flaws, but the overall verdict is favorable. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Says they thoroughly enjoyed it and it worked, despite minor complaints about the mouthguard and ending. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Thoroughly enjoyed it overall, but had notable criticisms regarding the mouthguard and the ending. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #90 w 0.105 Absolutely no attempt to try to de-age Josh Brolin in the flashbacks with young Jay. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.36 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.12 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.44 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the film for making no effort to de-age Josh Brolin in flashbacks. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Wry remark about not de-aging Brolin in flashbacks; gives no overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Neutral observation about casting/de-aging in flashbacks; no clear judgement of whether the film is good or bad. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Criticizes the film's lack of effort in de-aging the actor for flashback scenes. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the film for not de-aging Brolin in flashbacks. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film's failure to de-age Josh Brolin in the flashbacks. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a specific technical choice (no de-aging effects) without stating whether they liked or would recommend the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses casting and makeup choices without judging the overall film. | − | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | − | − | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #91 w 0.104 They dyed his hair at least VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.35 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.37 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Comments on a hair detail without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Brief remark about a character's appearance, possibly versus the book; no clear judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A brief remark about a hair-dye detail, likely in comparison to the source material; it gives no judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a brief observation about an actor's appearance without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Hair-dye joke, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A brief observation about the character's appearance, with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a light observation about a costume/hair detail with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Joking observation about character appearance, not a film review. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #92 w 0.104 I liked the part where the whale ate the guy and then he was in its' stomach VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.421 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly says they liked a scene in the film, with no criticism. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says they liked a specific scene. It's brief, but this is mild praise of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they liked a specific part of the film (the whale swallowing the guy), expressing enjoyment of the movie's content. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — A joke summarizing the entire premise of the movie rather than offering a genuine verdict. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly liked a key scene, indicating enjoyment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly say they liked a scene from the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter enjoys the whale-eats-guy scene; the gross, violent content is praised, signaling approval of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they liked a specific part of the film. | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + |
| thread #93 w 0.103 Man do I have a great 2000 year old recommendation for you! VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.659 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.89 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Jokes about an ancient recommendation without expressing any judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke referencing Jonah and the whale; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Joke recommending an ancient story (likely Jonah), not a judgment of the film Whalefall itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke/reference (likely to Jonah and the Whale) without expressing any opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke recommending an ancient story, not judging this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joking recommendation with no clear judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter enthusiastically recommends the film, calling it a great recommendation to others. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke/reference to the biblical story of Jonah and not a review of the film. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 |
| thread #94 w 0.103 By far the most harrowing movie I’ve seen this year. Spent a good chunk of it watching it like this 🫣😰 I really enjoyed this movie. I thought the characters were well handled as well as Jay figuring out how to get out of the whale. I loved how the orca attack was filmed. I… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.291 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.94 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly enjoyed the film, praising its characters, filmmaking, tense acting, and handling of the family drama. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Explicitly enjoyed it, praising characters, orca attack filming, father-son acting; harrowing intensity framed as praise. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Explicitly says they really enjoyed the film and praises characters, orca attack filming, father's voice handling, and acting; harrowing is praise. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they really enjoyed the movie, praising the character handling, filming, and tense acting. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly enjoyed the film and praised characters, filming, and acting. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly say they really enjoyed the movie and praise its characters, acting, and filmmaking. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they really enjoyed the film, praising its handling of characters, orca attack, and acting. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Explicitly states 'I really enjoyed this movie' and praises various elements despite harrowing content. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #95 w 0.102 I was a big wan of the book and ended really enjoying the movie. It's weirdly sentimental but I liked that about the book, and I'm glad they didn't shy away from that in the movie, even if it ends up being polarizing for it. For people who complain about the flashbacks, I get… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.954 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.83 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — They really enjoyed the movie, praising its sentimentality and effective family drama despite potential polarization. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter really enjoyed the movie, liked its sentimentality, and defends its flashbacks as effective family drama. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they ended up really enjoying the movie, praises its sentimentality and calls it an effective family drama. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they really enjoyed the movie and calls it an effective family drama. Grok 4.7: positive — Enjoyed the movie and calls it an effective family drama. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They enjoyed the movie and call it an effective family drama, despite understanding complaints about the flashbacks. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they ended up really enjoying the movie and calls it an effective family drama. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter liked the movie and defended its sentimental elements and flashbacks. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #96 w 0.102 I really teared up when 😭😭 way better movie than I was expecting it to be, and probably the most tense I’ve been in a horror movie since the bone temple VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.718 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.96 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls it way better than expected and praises its exceptional tension and emotional impact. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Teared up, says it exceeded expectations, and calls it the most tense horror in a while. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says it was way better than expected, emotionally moving, and highly tense; clear enthusiastic praise for the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states the movie was 'way better' than expected and praises its intense atmosphere and emotional impact. Grok 4.7: positive — Exceeded expectations, emotionally moving, and intensely tense. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise it as better than expected and describe it as exceptionally tense. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says it was way better than expected, found it tense, and teared up; clear approval. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls it 'way better movie than I was expecting' and praises its tension. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #97 w 0.101 It truly sucks the studio chose to release Whalefall in a busy week because it's a excellent film which deserves crazy WOM. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.402 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.03 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls it an excellent film deserving strong word of mouth; criticism targets the studio’s release timing. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it an excellent film deserving great word of mouth; complaint targets release timing, not the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls Whalefall an excellent film deserving strong word of mouth; the complaint is about the studio's release timing, not the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly calls it an 'excellent film' that deserves strong word-of-mouth. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it an excellent film deserving strong word of mouth; criticizes release timing, not the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it an excellent film deserving strong word of mouth; criticizes only the studio's release timing. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter calls Whalefall an excellent film deserving strong word of mouth, clearly endorsing it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls it an excellent film that deserves attention. | + | − | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #98 w 0.101 Just got back, being from Monterey and having lived and dived there, this movie made me seriously homesick. :) But Josh Brolin is a GD American Treasure VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.477 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.86 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Warmly praises the film’s evocative Monterey setting and Josh Brolin, expressing an appreciative overall reaction. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Movie evoked fond homesickness; enthusiastic praise of Josh Brolin, overall warm reaction. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter enjoyed the film, found it evocative of home, and strongly praised Josh Brolin's performance, implying a favorable overall view. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter enjoyed the movie's authentic setting and strongly praised Josh Brolin's performance. Grok 4.7: positive — Film evoked strong homesick emotion; praises lead actor warmly. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The movie stirred strong homesickness, and the commenter enthusiastically praises Josh Brolin. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says the film made them homesick (a warm reaction) and praises Josh Brolin as an American treasure. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the movie for making them homesick and calls Josh Brolin an American treasure. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| other-sub #0 w 0.5 I held my breath through most of this movie. It follows Austin's character, a grieving son, as he goes into the waters to find his dad. The father lives for the ocean is desperate to pass on his love of diving, the ocean and whales. The son learned the skills but never felt the… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.751 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.82 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.62 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises immersive tension and emotional engagement, and recommends it despite criticism of the CGI. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises gripping, claustrophobic tension and recommends it; minor CGI complaint doesn't outweigh overall enthusiasm. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Describes gripping, immersive, claustrophobic experience and recommends it to ocean and whale lovers; the CGI complaint is minor. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Found the film intensely gripping and immersive, recommending it to others despite a minor criticism of the CGI. Grok 4.7: positive — Gripped and recommends it despite CGI criticism. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the suspense and claustrophobic scenes, recommend it to ocean and whale lovers, and mention CGI as a minor flaw. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Held breath, gripped seat, felt trapped; praises the film and says anyone who loves the ocean should watch it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the suspense, claustrophobia, and emotional beats, and explicitly recommends the film. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| other-sub #1 w 0.354 Whalefall just came out a few days ago. I just watched it in theaters today. This movie is based on the book by Daniel Kraus. Whalefall is a survival thriller about a young man who goes scuba diving off the coast of California to search for his missing father's remains. During… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.681 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls it the best movie seen recently and gives it 9.8/10. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it the best movie seen in a while and rates it 9.8/10. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter calls it the best movie they've seen in a while and gives it 9.8/10, despite mostly summarizing the plot. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter rates the film 9.8/10 and calls it the "best movie I have seen in a hot minute." Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it the best movie in a while and rates it 9.8/10. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it the best movie they've seen recently and rates it 9.8/10. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says it's the best movie they've seen in a while and gives it 9.8/10. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states it is the best movie they have seen in a hot minute and gives it a 9.8/10 rating. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |