Street Fighter
← all movies. Each comment's label under every pathway (+ positive, − negative, 0 neutral / mixed / no verdict; hover a cell for the verdict).
Pick a pathway to show its verdict and rationale under every comment: VADER (old v1) · siebert+opinion (previous live) · Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) · GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE) · Claude Opus 5.5 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Gemini 4 Argon · Grok 4.7 · GPT-6 Luna (cheap) · Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) · Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap)
| comment (excerpt ≤280 chars) | VADER (old v1) | siebert+opinion (previous live) | Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) | GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE) | Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.7 | GPT-6 Luna (cheap) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank · score · bucket · Reddit · comments +/0/− | #14 50 Skip R 49 41/13/46 | #12 40 Skip R 30 23/24/53 | #14 28 Skip R 4 2/48/50 | #14 36 Skip R 20 17/33/50 | #14 34 Skip R 16 10/49/41 | #14 35 Skip R 18 11/53/36 | #14 35 Skip R 18 12/49/39 | #14 34 Skip R 18 12/45/43 | #14 34 Skip R 16 12/41/47 | #14 36 Skip R 22 11/54/35 | #13 34 Skip R 17 10/49/41 |
| thread #0 w 1.0 They really made it a point to ensure we knew it was the year 1993 at the start of this movie, only to feature a lot of music that came out well after 1993. They even referenced Taco Bell gorditas, which were introduced in 1998. And how were they singing karaoke to 4 Non… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.426 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.03 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.65 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — The historical inconsistencies were distracting, conveying criticism of the film despite qualifying their relevance to story quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Points out anachronisms but explicitly says they don't reflect on film quality; no overall judgement. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment points out anachronisms and distraction but explicitly avoids judging film quality; no clear overall like/dislike verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Focuses on historical anachronisms and explicitly notes this doesn't reflect on the movie's overall quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Notes anachronisms but explicitly withholds judgment on quality. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — The anachronisms distracted them, expressing a criticism of the film even without judging its story. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER 0.426 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses timeline/nostalgia inconsistencies without giving a clear verdict on the film's quality. | + | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #1 w 0.707 I find the fact that you know the release date of the Taco Bell gordita right off the top your head extremely hilarious. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.585 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.46 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.76 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — The comment jokes about someone's Taco Bell knowledge without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke reply about another commenter knowing a Taco Bell gordita release date; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about another commenter knowing a Taco Bell release date; no judgment of the film Street Fighter. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment reacts to another user's fast food trivia and does not mention or evaluate the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about Taco Bell trivia, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about someone knowing a Taco Bell release date, with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Joke about the commenter's trivia knowledge; makes no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke about a quote from the movie, not a verdict on the film. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #2 w 0.577 I remember exactly where I was, what grade I was in at the time etc lol VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.421 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.24 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Recalls personal circumstances at the time without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Nostalgic memory of watching it, with no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Nostalgic personal memory about when they saw or heard of it; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter shares a personal memory without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Remembers context of viewing, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They recall when they were at a particular point in life, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Nostalgic anecdote about when they first saw it; no clear judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter shares a personal memory related to the time of release, expressing no opinion on the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #3 w 0.5 Great grandparents: I remember where I was when I heard about Hitler's death Grandparents: I remember where I was when I heard about JFK's assassination Millenials: I remember where I was when I heard about the twin towers falling u/CincyGamer with a tear rolling down their… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.67 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.17 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — The comment jokes about historical memories and praises a Gordita, without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about a Gordita (likely a Taco Bell tie-in); no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke about generational memories and a Gordita (food item); no judgment of the Street Fighter film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke about another user and fast food, offering no opinion on the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about generational memories and a Gordita, no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment jokes about a Gordita and does not judge the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER -0.67 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment makes a meme joke about Taco Bell's Gordita and does not discuss the movie. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #4 w 0.447 Who let the dogs out? Many Men? The music was all over the place, which is crazy because it’s not like they don’t have a game soundtrack to pull from VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.595 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.70 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.87 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the film’s incoherent music choices and failure to use the game soundtrack. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's music choices as all over the place, ignoring the game soundtrack. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's music as inconsistent and a missed opportunity given the game soundtrack; the opening jokes are not praise. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the film's musical choices and failure to use the source material's soundtrack. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the film’s mismatched, scattered soundtrack choices. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film’s inconsistent music choices. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on the soundtrack choices and a joke about a song; no clear judgement of the film overall. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the music choices and calls the soundtrack 'all over the place'. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | 0 | − |
| thread #5 w 0.408 One of the things that frustrates me the most with adaptations of video games is how they seem to refuse to use the soundtracks from the games. The animated Mario movie did the same thing, throwing in modern songs in the background instead of the iconic music from the games. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.625 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.92 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Expresses frustration with the adaptation's failure to use the game's iconic soundtrack. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Expresses frustration that the film, like other game adaptations, skipped the iconic game soundtrack. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's choice to avoid the game's soundtrack, framing it as a frustrating flaw of the adaptation. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter expresses frustration over the movie's soundtrack choices, criticizing it as a flaw in the adaptation. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — General complaint about game adaptations and Mario, not a verdict on Street Fighter. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses video game adaptations and the Mario movie, but gives no judgment of Street Fighter. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment criticises video game adaptations generally and mentions another film's soundtrack choices; no judgement of this Street Fighter film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses video game adaptations and soundtracks generally without judging the specific film. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #6 w 0.378 They did have the iconic Guile's Theme to introduce him, at least. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.16 P(pos)=0.02 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Notes the use of Guile's iconic theme without expressing an overall opinion of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — 'At least' offers a small consolation, implying the film otherwise disappointed, especially Guile's portrayal. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — "At least" implies the film was mostly lacking, with one small positive noted (Guile's Theme); a faint, backhanded lean negative but with a clear praise point. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The phrasing 'at least' implies the rest of the film was disappointing with only one minor redeeming quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Notes one soundtrack detail without judging the film overall. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Notes one recognizable musical cue, but gives no clear judgment of the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Notes a specific musical choice (Guile's Theme) but offers no clear judgement of the film's overall quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Mentioning a specific element or soundtrack without expressing an overall opinion on the film itself. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #7 w 0.354 I actually threw my hands up in disbelief at the "Who Let the Dogs Out" track playing as Ken's entrance music. That version released in October 2000. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.202 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.47 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Points out an apparent musical anachronism without expressing an overall opinion of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Points out an anachronistic song with disbelief, but gives no overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment notes a trivia/anachronism about a song's release date; the reaction is mild disbelief but no overall verdict on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Points out a musical anachronism in a scene without expressing an overall opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: negative — Disbelief at anachronistic entrance music criticizes the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Notes a soundtrack anachronism but gives no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Trivia about the soundtrack's release date; no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Throwing hands up in disbelief at an anachronistic song choice implies criticism of the film. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #8 w 0.333 Is it just me or were there an insane amount of time skips/jumps in this. Felt like a ton of scenes were left on the cutting room floor. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.178 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.90 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes excessive time jumps and seemingly missing scenes, implying disjointed editing. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes choppy editing and excessive time jumps, suggesting missing scenes; no praise offered. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's editing, noting excessive time skips and a sense that many scenes were cut, implying choppy, flawed storytelling. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the film's editing and pacing, noting it felt incomplete with too many time jumps. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes excessive time skips and scenes left out, implying poor editing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film's frequent time jumps and imply its editing leaves too much out. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Complains about excessive time skips and missing scenes, a criticism of the film's editing with no offsetting praise. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the editing and pacing, feeling scenes were left out. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #9 w 0.316 Guile losing to Vega with absolutely no combat shown was mind blowingly weird. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.002 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.43 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the film’s unexplained combat outcome and lack of action shown as mind-blowingly weird. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes an odd creative choice of skipping Guile's fight; no praise offered. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes a plot/storytelling choice as 'mind blowingly weird' because no combat was shown, implying disapproval of the film's execution. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes a weird storytelling and editing choice regarding an off-screen fight. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes an unshown fight outcome as mind-blowingly weird. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film’s bizarre choice to have Guile lose without showing any combat. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Calls a plot moment 'mind blowingly weird' with no combat shown, implying criticism of the film's choices rather than praise. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes a bizarre directorial choice in the film, indicating dissatisfaction. | 0 | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #10 w 0.302 I was totally on-board with everything in this movie, until that part. And then story and 'tournament' if you can call it, just rapidly fell apart. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.74 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Initially enjoyed it, but says the story and tournament rapidly fell apart. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Enjoyed most of the film but says the story and tournament fell apart afterward; no clear overall lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Commenter enjoyed the film initially but says story and tournament fell apart afterward; praise then criticism, leaning slightly negative overall. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Enjoyed the start, but concludes that the story and tournament rapidly fell apart, leaving a negative overall impression. Grok 4.7: negative — Started engaged, then story and tournament rapidly fell apart. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They say the story and tournament rapidly fell apart, expressing disappointment despite initially being on board. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter was on board initially, but says the story and tournament rapidly fell apart, indicating overall disappointment with the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter states the story rapidly fell apart, indicating disappointment with the film. | 0 | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #11 w 0.289 Yeah that kind of was the turning point now that I think about it. Second half was really directionless and messy. All those people just randomly dropping out. I mean I get it ... the tournament was just a ruse to get everyone there. But that's such a weird ass plot to have in… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.694 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.66 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.35 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the second half as directionless and messy, and the tournament plot as a poor fit for Street Fighter. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes second half as directionless and messy, and calls the plot weird for Street Fighter. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the second half as directionless and messy, and calls the tournament-ruse plot weird for Street Fighter. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Criticizes the second half as directionless and messy, and calls the overall plot choice weird. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls the second half directionless, messy, and the plot weird. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the second half as directionless and messy, and call the plot weird. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Calls the second half directionless and messy and questions the plot's fit for Street Fighter; overall criticism of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the second half as 'directionless and messy' and calls the plot 'weird ass'. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #12 w 0.277 100%. It's like... Bison has weapons capable of capturing Ryu, and was able to find him, so it's not like he needed to be drawn out with a tournament... I could forgive it, if the movie didn’t fall apart, because I wasn't expecting uber tight plotting, but just deliver on the… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.119 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.90 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.71 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the movie for falling apart and failing to deliver on its setup, despite modest plotting expectations. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes plot logic and says the movie fell apart, failing to deliver on its setup. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes plot logic and says the movie falls apart and fails to deliver on its setup. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the plot logic and explicitly states that the movie falls apart. Grok 4.7: negative — Says the movie fell apart and failed to deliver on its setup. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the movie for falling apart and failing to deliver on its setup. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.119 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter states the movie fell apart and failed to deliver on its setup. | + | + | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #13 w 0.267 Biggest one was about 70% in, when Ken unmasks himself as infiltrating the jail to save Ryu. How did the movie go from Chun-Li telling him about Bison’s plan to that, did I miss something? VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.382 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.63 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Asks about a confusing plot transition without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Asks about a confusing plot point without clearly judging the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Asks a plot-confusion question about a scene; no clear overall judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter asks a question about a specific plot point/continuity gap without stating an overall opinion on the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot confusion about a scene; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Asks about a plot transition without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a plot continuity question about a scene; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is asking a question about a plot gap without expressing a like or dislike for the film. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #14 w 0.258 The non-existent Guile/Vega fight was the oddest choice in my opinion. I would have liked to see that, since Guile barely got any fighting time. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.259 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.49 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the missing Guile/Vega fight and Guile’s insufficient fighting time as disappointing choices. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes a choice in the film and wanted more Guile fighting; no praise offered. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes a specific choice (missing Guile/Vega fight, little fighting time for Guile) as odd, implying disappointment, without any offsetting praise. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes a creative choice and expresses disappointment about a character's lack of fight scenes. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Notes one missing fight; no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film for omitting a desired fight and giving Guile too little action. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Calls the omitted Guile/Vega fight an odd choice and wishes it had been included, criticising the film's decisions. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes a major omission in the film, expressing disappointment with the action. | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | − |
| thread #15 w 0.25 It’s a travesty that we didn’t get a Sonic Boom. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.572 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.60 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Expresses disappointment that the film omitted the iconic Sonic Boom move. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Hyperbolic joke about a missing signature move; no overall judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Laments the absence of a Sonic Boom (a Street Fighter move) without clearly judging the film's quality; joking reference rather than a verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Expresses disappointment over a single missing character move, without offering an overall verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about a missing game move, not a film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film for omitting a desired feature, calling the omission a travesty. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a joke about a different film (Sonic Boom) not a judgement of Street Fighter itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Complains about a missing iconic element, expressing disappointment in the film. | − | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | − |
| thread #16 w 0.243 Should’ve known when one of the trailers had him ranting about how he couldn’t believe Ryu threw a fireball. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.72 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — “Should’ve known” frames the trailer’s fireball rant as a warning sign of the film’s poor quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on a trailer hint about a character; no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Implies the film was bad, saying they 'should've known' from the trailer's ridiculous dialogue; sarcastic hindsight criticism of the movie. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Saying they 'should've known' based on a bad trailer detail implies the movie turned out poorly. Grok 4.7: negative — Implies the film was as bad as the absurd trailer suggested. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They imply the trailer’s fireball reaction was an obvious warning sign about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.0 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the trailer and marketing, implying the movie is bad. | 0 | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #17 w 0.236 that pacing was all over the place. i get they wanted to cover the tournament and the backstory but it felt like watching a highlight reel at some parts. shame cause the fights themselves were actually decent. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.329 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.51 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes erratic pacing and highlight-reel storytelling; decent fights do not outweigh the overall disappointment. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Main criticism of the pacing dominates; the praise for the fights is a minor concession framed with 'shame'. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Criticizes erratic pacing and highlight-reel feel, but concedes the fights were decent; criticism is heavier but praise is real, no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Overall disappointment due to messy pacing, framed as a 'shame' despite decent fights. Grok 4.7: negative — Pacing criticized as a highlight reel; decent fights wasted, overall disappointment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — The pacing criticism dominates; the fights being decent is faint praise. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.329 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Criticizes the poor pacing and highlight-reel feel, but praises the decent fights. | − | − | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | 0 |
| thread #18 w 0.229 I thought the back and forth was just for anime fight development but then the rest of the movie just kept getting more and more confusing. No fight with Bison was just the shitty cherry on top. Shame. I really enjoyed the 1st act for what it was. I have no idea why they didn’t… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.52 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.75 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Enjoyed the first act, but found the rest increasingly confusing and disappointing, especially the missing Bison fight. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Enjoyed first act, but overall criticizes confusing plot, missing Bison fight; calls it a shame. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the confusing later film and missing Bison fight; only enjoyed the first act, with overall disappointment ('Shame'). Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Enjoyed the first act, but overall disappointed by the confusing rest of the movie and lack of climax. Grok 4.7: negative — Enjoyed the first act, but found the rest confusing and disappointing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They enjoyed the first act but found the rest confusing and were disappointed by the missing Bison fight. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter says the movie got more confusing, calls the missing Bison fight a shitty cherry on top, and says 'Shame.' Only the first act earned praise, so the overall lean is negative. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter found the movie confusing, was disappointed by the lack of a Bison fight, and called it shitty. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #19 w 0.224 Weirdest part was where Chun-Li looks distraught and defeated in one scene, and it instantly cuts to her walking confidently to her first meeting with M Bison. Was just so weirdly cut because the tone completely flipped. To be honest the editing in this movie reminded me of the… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.934 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.93 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.56 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes jarring tonal transitions and editing, explicitly saying the filmmakers did a bad job. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's editing as bad, comparing it unfavorably to Suicide Squad. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's editing as jarring and badly done, comparing it unfavorably to Suicide Squad, with no praise offered. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the movie's poor editing and jarring tonal shifts. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the film's editing as badly done and tonally jarring. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the editing as jarring and say the editors did a bad job. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Criticises the editing and tonal flow as weird and badly done, implying a poor overall verdict on the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the editing, comparing it unfavorably to Suicide Squad and concluding they did a bad job. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #20 w 0.218 Those flashback scenes were fucking incredible. Titmouse does it like nobody else. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.361 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.57 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Enthusiastically praises the film’s flashback scenes as incredible. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic praise of the flashback scenes and the animation studio's work. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Enthusiastically praises the flashback scenes and the animation studio's work as incredible, implying a favorable view of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter strongly praises the flashback scenes and animation studio as incredible. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the flashback scenes as incredible and uniquely well done. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the flashback scenes incredible and praises the animation studio's work. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter enthusiastically praises the flashback scenes and the animation studio, indicating they liked the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the flashback scenes as fucking incredible. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #21 w 0.213 They really sold me on the idea that this should have been entirely animated. The live action scenes just barely worked VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.93 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the live-action scenes as barely working and suggests the film should have been entirely animated. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Says the film should have been animated; the live-action scenes only barely worked, a lukewarm-to-critical verdict. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Says the film should have been entirely animated and that the live action scenes barely worked, a critical judgment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the live-action scenes, stating they 'just barely worked' and the movie should have been animated instead. Grok 4.7: negative — Live-action scenes barely worked; implies the film should have been animated. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They say the live-action scenes barely worked and imply the film would have been better entirely animated. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter says the film should have been fully animated and that its live-action scenes barely worked, a lukewarm-to-negative judgement. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the live-action execution and suggests it should have been animated instead. | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #22 w 0.209 The problem is it cut from serious anime footage to fucking goofy faced Noah Centineo tying to emote and I absolutely could not reconcile the two as the same character. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.625 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.89 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the jarring mismatch between serious anime footage and Noah Centineo’s performance as the same character. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes jarring tonal clash and Noah Centineo's unconvincing performance as a 'problem' with the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's tonal inconsistency and Noah Centineo's goofy performance, saying they couldn't reconcile him with the character. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the jarring tonal shift and poor casting/acting. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the film's jarring cut from serious anime to goofy acting. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the jarring contrast between serious anime footage and Noah Centineo's performance, which they couldn't reconcile. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.625 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the jarring tonal shifts and inability to reconcile the acting, indicating they did not like the film. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #23 w 0.204 Why tf couldn't we have just gotten that as the entire movie? Prob the best SF has looked animated. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.637 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.71 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Praises one animated segment while expressing disappointment that the entire movie wasn't like it. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Strongly praises an animated segment but wishes the whole movie were like it, implying the rest disappointed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Implies the film itself fell short compared to the clip/animation they praise; wishing that had been the whole movie is criticism of the actual film. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Praises one animated sequence while expressing disappointment that the rest of the movie wasn't like it. Grok 4.7: negative — Wishes the whole movie matched a better part, implying the film fell short. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They praise how the film looks animated, but imply the rest of the movie falls short of that standard. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — Says the animated bit is probably the best Street Fighter has looked, but asks why the whole movie wasn't like that, implying disappointment with the live-action film overall. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the animation quality of the film, calling it the best it has looked. | + | + | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | + |
| thread #24 w 0.2 ...Why did Cammy scream in that weird horror movie way when M Bison told her to ready her killer bees or whatever. Like wtf VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.625 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.24 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.85 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes Cammy’s scream as weird and incongruous, expressing dissatisfaction with the scene. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Confused question about a specific scene; no clear judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter is confused about a specific scene and asks about it; no clear overall judgement of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment expresses confusion about a single strange moment without giving an overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: negative — Mocks a scene as weird and nonsensical, signaling dislike. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize Cammy's scream as weird and question the film's choice. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks about a scene's odd delivery and plot detail; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is asking a confused question about a specific scene without expressing an overall opinion on the film. | − | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #25 w 0.196 Why is Cammy playing such a weird role? I haven't seen any of the previous movies or content outside of SF6 but has she always been a side character? VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.193 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.04 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.41 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Asks about Cammy’s role and franchise history without judging the film overall. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Question about Cammy's role and franchise history; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Asks a question about Cammy's role and franchise history without giving any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter asks a question about a character's role and franchise lore without giving a verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Question about Cammy's role, no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Asks about Cammy's role and franchise history without evaluating the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a question about a character's role; no judgement of the film's quality or whether they liked it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is asking a question about the character and has not seen the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #26 w 0.192 cammy wasn't in the first few versions of SF2, but she's more famous bc she's the "other"/2nd female character and has a notable design. she's only recently more important in the lore/story, but her role here makes sense bc she was an assassin for bison (who later breaks free) VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.796 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.01 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.95 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses Cammy’s game history and why her film role fits, without judging the film overall. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses Cammy's game history and lore; her role 'makes sense' is not an overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Explains Cammy's character history and role in the lore without giving any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses character lore and states her role makes sense, without giving an overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Lore and character trivia; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses Cammy’s history and explains why her role makes sense, without judging the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses Cammy's game history and lore role; no judgement of the film itself expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses video game lore and character history without expressing any opinion on the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #27 w 0.189 Yeah back then they created Chun-li for her legs and Cammy for her ass. Game devs weren't exactly subtle in the 90's. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.077 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.06 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.44 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses video game character designs, without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about game character design; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment is trivia/joke about character design in 90s games, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment discusses character design in the video game rather than judging the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses 90s game character design, not the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on the games’ character designs, not the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on character design history and 90s game developers; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses 90s video game character design without judging the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #28 w 0.186 You have one of the greatest video game soundtracks...and you're going to have Ken come out to "Who Let the Dogs Out?". Man, fuck this movie. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.178 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the soundtrack choice and explicitly expresses contempt for the movie. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes the music choice, wasting a great soundtrack, and says 'fuck this movie'. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter mocks a baffling music choice and ends with 'fuck this movie', a clear overall rejection of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter explicitly rejects the movie, criticising its soundtrack choices instead of using the original game's music. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the soundtrack choice and explicitly rejects the movie. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film’s music choice and explicitly say, “Man, fuck this movie.” Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Mocks the film's choices and ends with 'fuck this movie', clearly expressing dislike of it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter expresses clear dislike by saying "fuck this movie" due to poor creative choices. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #29 w 0.183 Which didn't come out until 2000 and the film took place in 1993 I mean... at least have SOME continuity! VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.17 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the film for an anachronism and lack of continuity. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film for an anachronism and lack of continuity, a complaint about the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's lack of continuity/anachronism, implying a flaw in the film itself, though it's a minor nitpick. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the film's lack of continuity and anachronisms. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the film for a continuity error. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film for a continuity inconsistency. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Points out a continuity/timeline inconsistency in the film's setting; no overall judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticises the film for a lack of continuity regarding dates. | 0 | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | 0 | − |
| thread #30 w 0.18 I mean them singing and bonding over What’s Up by 4 Non Blondes is a major plot point and that came out in 1993, the year the movie takes place. But they show them singing it in flashbacks from the 80s. Such a lazy fucking movie. He-Man has way more relevance with that song and… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.876 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=1.00 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Calls the movie lazy and criticizes anachronistic music, out-of-place song choices, and reliance on stunt casting. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Calls it a lazy movie, criticizes anachronistic song use and stunt casting as stupid and out of place. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Calls it a 'lazy fucking movie', criticizes anachronistic song use, out-of-place music choices, and reliance on stunt casting. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter calls it a 'lazy fucking movie' and criticizes its anachronistic song choices and stunt casting. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls the movie lazy and stupid, criticizing anachronisms and stunt casting. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Calls the movie lazy and criticizes its song choices as stupid, out of place, and reliant on stunt casting. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.876 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter calls the film 'lazy' and criticizes its plot holes, music choices, and casting. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #31 w 0.177 This is one of the horniest PG-13 movies in recent years, from Ryu vs Honda in the Sauna, Cammy flirted with Chun Li, Don Sauvage licked Cammy’s boots, a dweeb designed Chun Li’s outfit to the M. Bison sniffing Ryu’s feet in the prison, somehow, I cannot believe this is a PG-13… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.542 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.97 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes sexual content and expresses surprise at the rating and cameos without judging the film’s quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Lists amusing suggestive moments and cameos with surprise, but gives no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes the film's suggestive content and cameos with amused surprise, but never states whether they liked it or would recommend it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes bizarre scenes and cameos without expressing whether they liked or disliked the movie overall. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Surprised by sexual content and cameos; no like or dislike of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter describes suggestive scenes and cameos but does not judge whether the film is good or recommend it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Lists scenes and cameos with amused observations but never states whether they liked or would recommend the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter lists bizarre details and surprises about the movie without giving an overall positive or negative verdict. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #32 w 0.174 So many shots of Chun Li’s 🍑, not that I was complaining VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.202 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.34 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Expresses enjoyment of the film’s repeated shots of Chun Li. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joking remark about camera shots of a character; no clear judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment notes frequent shots of a character's backside with a mild joking approval, but gives no overall judgement of the film or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a lighthearted observation about a character's appearance without giving an overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about camera shots, no overall film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They approve of the shots, but give no judgment of the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter enjoys the film's content, joking approvingly about the shots of Chun-Li and saying they weren't complaining. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter expresses approval of the film's visual content. | − | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + |
| thread #33 w 0.171 She worked so hard for this movie, it would be a crime if we did not see the results on the big screen. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.656 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.36 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Encourages seeing the movie on the big screen, framing it as deserving an audience. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on an actress's effort and hopes for release; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on effort and wanting it released/seen, not a judgement of the film's quality; no stated like or dislike. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Expresses anticipation to see the movie in theaters based on an actor's effort, without having seen or judged it. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Praises an actor's effort, not the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Expresses support for seeing her work, but gives no opinion on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter argues the film's hard work deserves a big-screen audience, implying they want it seen and endorsing it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses an actor's hard work and the big screen release, not a judgment of the film itself. | − | + | − | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 |
| thread #34 w 0.169 I was kinda shocked she didn't get the spiked cuffs. and that they added full pants to her costume VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.252 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.05 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Expresses surprise at costume changes without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on costume design changes without judging the film's quality overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on costume differences and a missing detail, expressing surprise, but gives no clear judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely observes costume changes without expressing an opinion on the quality of the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Costume detail observation only; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on costume changes without expressing an overall opinion of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on costume differences from the source material without expressing any overall judgement of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is only discussing costume design details without expressing a judgment on the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #35 w 0.167 A guy behind me went "sheeesh" during the scene with the fireplace. Just echoed in the otherwise silent theatre 🤣 VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.494 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.82 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.29 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Recounts an audience reaction during a scene without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Anecdote about an audience member's reaction; commenter gives no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Anecdote about another moviegoer's reaction in the theater; the commenter gives no judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Shares an anecdote about an audience reaction in the theater without expressing an opinion on the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Audience anecdote only; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Shares an audience reaction during a scene without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a theatre moment and a bystander's reaction; no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment shares a theater anecdote without expressing a personal opinion or verdict on the film itself. | + | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #36 w 0.164 Don't forget the scene immediately before the Sauna fight, where Chun-Li is entering a steamy shower fully naked on-screen (without any naughty bits showing)... ...which then transitions to Honda's man boobs out on full display VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.234 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.57 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes a scene and humorous transition without judging the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Humorous recollection of a scene without any judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Jokingly recalls a scene's content and transition without stating whether they liked or disliked the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely describes a humorous scene transition from the movie without offering any opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Scene trivia and joke, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes and jokes about a scene, but gives no opinion on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes specific scenes and nudity without any judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is only describing specific scenes without expressing any judgment or recommendation of the film. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #37 w 0.162 I assume that’s a reference to her shower scene in the animated movie. Did they show her butt in the shower or just her back? VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.01 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.86 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Asks about a shower scene in the animated movie without expressing an opinion on this film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Asks about a scene reference from the animated movie; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter asks a trivia-style question about a shower scene in the animated film, offering no judgment of the movie itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment asks a question about a specific scene without expressing any opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Asks a trivia question about a scene; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Asks about a scene in the animated movie without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a factual question about a scene in an animated movie; expresses no judgement of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing a specific scene and asking a question without expressing an opinion on the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #38 w 0.16 All that and yet the hottest (pun not intended because he never actually breathes any fire) one is probably Dhalsim with his shoulder shimmy. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.34 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.37 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.65 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Jokes about Dhalsim’s attractiveness and shoulder shimmy without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joking comment about which character is hottest; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Joking comment about Dhalsim being the 'hottest' character; no overall judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke about a character's appearance without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about Dhalsim's look, no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A humorous comment about a character's attractiveness, with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Joking about a character's appearance and a pun; no clear judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke about a character and contains no evaluation of the film itself. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #39 w 0.158 The most egregious I’ve seen in recent memory. It literally just… . It’s so bold I can’t help but be in awe of it. What a movie. A good one? Not really. But what a movie. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.783 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.51 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Expresses awe at its boldness but explicitly says it is not really a good movie. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Admits it's not really good despite being in awe of its boldness; amused appreciation, but quality verdict negative. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Awed by the film's boldness and spectacle, but explicitly says it's not really a good movie; admiration and criticism balance. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — The commenter explicitly states it is not really a good movie, yet expresses awe at its boldness. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls it not really good; awe is at its egregious boldness, not quality. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They explicitly say it is not a good movie, despite admiring its boldness. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — Calls it egregious and 'not really' good, but is in awe and says 'what a movie' twice; ambivalent overall. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Acknowledges it is not a good movie, yet expresses awe and calls it quite a movie. | + | + | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #40 w 0.156 This wasn’t a “good” movie but idk it felt so…. authentic? It didn’t feel like the type of safe 2010s-2020s blockbuster you’d expect it to be. The way they commit to the look of the games even if it’s impossible to make look good in live action, the effort put into the animated… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.959 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.89 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Despite calling it not good, they admire its authenticity, committed style, distinctive humor, and uniquely human creativity. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Admits it's not 'good' but praises its authenticity, commitment, effort, and distinctly human-made feel. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Admits it isn't 'good' but praises its authenticity, commitment, humor, and human-made feel at length; leans clearly favorable overall. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Despite admitting it's not traditionally 'good,' the commenter strongly praises its authenticity, effort, and unique human-made charm. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it not conventionally good but praises its authentic, human-made commitment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They say it wasn’t a good movie but admire its authentic, distinctive choices and human-made feel. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.959 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film's unique, authentic, and human-made feel despite acknowledging it is not a 'good' movie. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + |
| thread #41 w 0.154 "Authentic" is a good way to put it. Felt like it had actual people understand the assignment on stuff fans wanted to see out of a fighting video game movie - even if fans themselves are not the best judges of filmmaking. I'd put it right up there with the original 90's Mortal… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.785 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.37 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises its authenticity, fan appeal, and charm, explicitly embracing its roughness and imperfections. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises authenticity and charm, compares favorably to 90s Mortal Kombat; flaws acknowledged but framed as charming. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises it as authentic and charming, comparing it favorably to the 90s Mortal Kombat; acknowledges roughness but leans clearly positive. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the film as authentic, charming, and delivering what fans wanted despite its rough edges. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it authentic and charming despite roughness; favorably compares it to Mortal Kombat. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises its fan appeal and charming roughness, despite acknowledging imperfections. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.785 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film as charming despite flaws, comparing it favorably to Mortal Kombat. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #42 w 0.152 This movie was Street Fighter 1.5. Between the events of SF 1 and SF 2. I would've loved this movie if the last half was as good as the first half. They set up a fighting tournament and then nearly all of it happens off screen or everyone forfeits. Off screen. In a movie based… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.743 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.50 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Liked the first half but criticizes the disappointing second half, off-screen tournament, and wasted cast. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Says first half good but second half fails; tournament off screen; cast deserved better—overall disappointed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — VADER 0.743 Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Liked the first half, but ultimately disappointed by the second half and says the cast deserved better. Grok 4.7: negative — Liked the first half but the weak second half left them disappointed. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They praise the first half but criticize the second half and say the cast deserved better. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.743 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Liked the first half, but criticized the second half and the lack of fighting. Overall disappointment. | + | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #43 w 0.151 Can’t lie, I do think it was a funny bit to have that one guy win entirely due to forfeits. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.772 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film’s forfeit-winning gag as funny, with no criticism. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on a single funny bit without giving an overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on one funny bit (a character winning by forfeits) without giving an overall verdict on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises a specific comedic gag in the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Only calls one gag funny; no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise a comedic bit in the film as funny. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a plot detail (a fighter winning by forfeits) with a joke-like remark; no clear judgement of the film overall. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is only highlighting a funny specific detail about the plot, not judging the film overall. | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #44 w 0.149 Vega: 🕺 Guile: It’s not a beauty pageant Vega!! … Guile: …oh, but if it was…😋😋 VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.386 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.29 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.34 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A joke about Vega and Guile, with no evaluation of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke riffing on a scene/quote; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Jokey paraphrase or quote of a scene with emojis; no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is just a joke about the characters with no verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke quoting characters; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A playful quote exchange with no judgment of the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — A joke quoting in-film dialogue with no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Just quoting a funny dialogue from the movie without expressing an opinion on the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #45 w 0.147 I liked his character more than I thought I would, shame we didn’t get to see him fight VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.44 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.76 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.62 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Expresses unexpected enjoyment of a character, with a minor disappointment about not seeing him fight. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enjoyed the character more than expected; only a minor regret about not seeing him fight. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Praises the character as better than expected but regrets the missed fight; the praise is about one character, not the whole film, with mild disappointment. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment expresses an opinion on a specific character's role without giving an overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character comment only; no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They liked the character, but were disappointed the film didn’t show him fighting. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — Liked the character more than expected, but wishes there was more fighting; overall lean is slightly positive but with clear disappointment. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Liked a character more than expected, but was disappointed by the lack of fight scenes. | − | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #46 w 0.146 Cody Rhodes is super charismatic I find, they needed to use him more VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.599 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.36 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.84 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Praises Cody Rhodes’s charisma but criticizes the film for not using him enough. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Praises Cody Rhodes' charismatic performance but criticizes the film for underusing him; no overall lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Praises Cody Rhodes' charisma but implies the film underused him, a mild criticism; no clear overall verdict on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Praises a specific actor's charisma and wishes for more screen time, but gives no overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Praises a character and notes underuse; no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Praises Cody Rhodes and his limited use, but gives no overall judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises Cody Rhodes's charisma and wants more of him, implying they enjoyed his performance in the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses an actor/character performance without evaluating the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 |
| thread #47 w 0.144 Street Fighter is a mess of a fun movie! Andrew Koji as Ryu and Noah Centineo as Ken Masters are a fun duo with sibling rivalry. I don't know why Andrew Schulz was given such a big supporting role. I feel like someone like Paul Walter Hauser or a good actor could have done a… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.377 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Despite substantial criticisms, they call it fun and ultimately recommend it as a one-time mindless watch. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Praises duo, animated flashbacks, and comedy, but criticizes casting, editing, and the tournament; calls it a one-time watch. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Praises the fun duo, animated flashbacks, and bathhouse fight, but criticizes casting, editing, and tournament use; ends as a 'one-time mindless fun watch'. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Despite noting flaws in editing and acting, the commenter concludes it is a fun, mindless watch. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a messy but fun one-time watch despite editing and casting flaws. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Despite substantial flaws, they enjoyed its fun elements and call it a worthwhile one-time mindless watch. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER -0.377 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praises the fun elements and action, but criticizes editing, casting, and structural issues, calling it mindless fun. | − | − | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #48 w 0.143 The movie had a a few comedic moments, I laughed way too hard on how absurd the interaction between Dan and Guile is in the hallway. "You're lucky there's lots of oxygen between us." *proceeds to suck in the oxygen while getting closer and stare menancingly VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.637 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.95 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.62 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film’s comedic moments and describes laughing hard at an absurd interaction. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enjoyed the comedic moments and laughed hard at an absurd scene; mild praise with no criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter enjoyed the film's comedic moments, laughing hard at the absurd Dan and Guile hallway scene, implying enjoyment, though no explicit recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter enjoyed and laughed hard at the movie's comedic moments, with no criticism offered. Grok 4.7: positive — Enjoyed the film's absurd comedy and laughed hard at it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They enthusiastically enjoyed a comedic scene from the movie. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Says the film had comedic moments and they laughed too hard at a scene, a warm endorsement of those parts. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter shares a funny moment and quote without expressing an overall positive or negative opinion of the film. | + | − | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #49 w 0.141 My favourite part was: Chun-Li: ...what's happening? Dan: He's singing him back to life, obviously! Male friendships are very complex. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.439 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.80 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.63 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calling the scene their favourite part expresses enjoyment of the film's humor. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Shares a favourite quote, but gives no overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter calls a funny scene their favourite part and quotes it affectionately, implying enjoyment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter only shares a favorite quote from the movie without giving an overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls a comic scene their favourite part, showing enjoyment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calling a scene their favourite part expresses clear enjoyment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Quotes a joke from the film without any explicit judgement of the movie's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Quoting a favourite line without evaluating the overall film. | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #50 w 0.14 I understand not showing 7 tournament fights in a full bracket, but 4 (considering 3 forfeits) should have been displayed in full. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.214 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.38 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.38 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the film for not fully showing enough tournament fights. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film for not showing the tournament fights in full; no praise offered. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's choice to skip tournament fights, saying four should have been shown in full; a specific criticism without any offsetting praise. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the film's choice not to show all four tournament fights in full. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the film for not fully showing enough tournament fights. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film for not showing enough tournament fights in full. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter criticises the film's handling of fight scenes, expressing disappointment that more fights weren't shown in full; a clear complaint without overall praise. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticism of the film's lack of displayed tournament fights. | − | 0 | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #51 w 0.139 But then we wouldn’t have had the time wasting scenes of Bison trying to rile up Ryu. And the scenes of Chun-Li running around while accomplishing nothing. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.55 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.68 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.82 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes scenes as time-wasting and pointless, indicating dissatisfaction with the film. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Sarcastically criticises time-wasting scenes and pointless Chun-Li sequences, signalling dissatisfaction with the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Sarcastically criticizes the film's pacing, calling scenes time-wasting and Chun-Li's storyline pointless, implying a negative view of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the film's pacing and plot, calling multiple scenes 'time wasting' and 'accomplishing nothing'. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls scenes time-wasting and pointless, criticizing the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize scenes as time-wasting and say a character accomplishes nothing. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Sarcastically criticises the film's scenes as time-wasting and pointless, implying the movie is weak. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes time-wasting scenes and characters accomplishing nothing. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #52 w 0.137 Kyle Mooney He would be the first character I would cut. He just tipped the freak scales. Second would be Schulz. They come close to making Dan an interesting character ("peer" with Ryu and Ken but a loser) but he leans too hard on unfunny scumbag manager even apart from the… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.928 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.86 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes unnecessary characters, casting, and an unfunny portrayal that undermines potentially interesting characterization. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticises casting and characters as unfunny and overdone, wanting them cut; no praise offered. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes film's characters and casting choices (Kyle Mooney, Schulz, Dan) as unfunny and overdone, saying they'd cut them. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Criticizes the casting, characterization, and lack of humor regarding specific characters in the film. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes characters as cuttable, unfunny, and poorly written. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the character choices and say Dan’s portrayal leans too hard on an unfunny gimmick. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter wants characters cut, calls Mooney's performance a problem and Schulz unfunny; judges the film's cast negatively without praising it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes multiple characters and performances, calling them unfunny and poorly written. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #53 w 0.136 People seems to be split about the fight scenes. IMO Ken vs Dhalsim, onsen fight, ken vs ryu in the hotel were great. Chun Li vs Vega and Juri could've used more lights and fewer cuts, ditto Ryu vs Ken alley fight. Parts of the prison break fight were memorable. Blanka and… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.647 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.93 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): mixed — Praises several fights and lead actors but criticizes other fights, missing matchups, and excessive supporting characters without an overall lean. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Praises several fights and the lead actors but criticizes lighting, editing, missing matchups, and some characters; no clear lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Praises several fight scenes and the lead actors, but criticizes lighting, editing, missing Guile vs Vega, and too much Dan/Kyle Mooney; no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Offers a balanced mix of specific praise and criticism for fights and cast without stating an overall preference. Grok 4.7: mixed — Praises some fights and leads, criticizes others and excess characters, no overall lean. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — Praises several fights and the lead actors, but criticizes other fights and says Dan and Kyle Mooney were overused. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — VADER -0.647 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praises several fight scenes and actors, but criticizes others and pacing choices. | − | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #54 w 0.135 I was like “Wait, they completely skipped the Vega vs Guile fight?!?” WHY?!? VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.618 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.76 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Expresses frustration that the film omitted the anticipated Vega versus Guile fight. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Expresses frustration that the film skipped an anticipated fight, which criticises the film's choices. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Complains about the film skipping the Vega vs Guile fight, which criticizes a choice in the film, though no overall verdict is given. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Expresses frustration and disappointment that the film skipped a specific fight. Grok 4.7: negative — Frustrated that the film skipped a key fight. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film for skipping the Vega versus Guile fight. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Questions a skipped fight scene without expressing a clear judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Complaining about a missing scene indicates disappointment with the film. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | 0 | − |
| thread #55 w 0.134 Cody on Smackdown: So what do you want to talk about? The crowd: Why no Guile v Vega fight in Street Fighter? VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.504 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.06 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A wrestling joke about a missing matchup, without a clear judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke referencing wrestling and a missing fight; no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke about a missing Guile vs Vega fight; it hints at a minor gripe but gives no clear overall verdict on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke referencing a wrestling show and characters, offering no judgment on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about a missing fight, not a film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke referencing a missing fight, with no opinion about the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Quoted wrestling-show exchange asking about a missing fight; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke referencing a wrestling quote and lamenting a missing matchup, not reviewing the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #56 w 0.132 The Kyle Mooney stuff felt creepy but it was supposed to be funny. I think everybody watching this knows Chun-Li is hot, and the film knows that, but his character was just kind of gross. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.15 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.81 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the intended comedy as creepy and gross rather than funny. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes Kyle Mooney's comedic material as creepy and gross rather than funny, a failed element of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the Kyle Mooney material as creepy, unfunny, and gross despite being intended as humor; a critique of the film's writing. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes a specific character's intended humor as failing and feeling creepy and gross instead. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Critiques one character's failed humor, no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They criticize a character as creepy and gross, but give no clear judgment of the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a character's creepiness and the film's intent but gives no clear overall judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes parts of the film as creepy and gross, indicating an overall negative view. | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #57 w 0.131 I especially hate how it contextualizes VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.612 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.62 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.58 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Expresses hatred for how the film contextualizes something, indicating criticism despite the incomplete thought. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Commenter says they 'especially hate' how the film contextualizes something, which criticises the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter expresses hatred toward how the film contextualizes something, which is a criticism of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is an incomplete sentence lacking enough context to determine a verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: negative — Says they hate how the film contextualizes something. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They express strong dislike of how the film contextualizes something. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Says they especially hate how it contextualizes, an explicit criticism of the film's approach. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Expresses strong dislike for an aspect of the film. | − | − | − | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − |
| thread #58 w 0.13 what the hell were they smoking in the editing room VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.681 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.45 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.81 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — The rhetorical question criticizes the film's editing as incoherent or poorly judged. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Mocks the film's editing as incompetent, implying a clear negative judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Rhetorical jab at the editing implies the film's editing was bafflingly bad, a criticism of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The comment criticizes the film's editing, implying it makes no sense. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the film's editing as nonsensical. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the film’s editing, implying they disliked it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Mocking the editing as bizarre implies the film's execution was bad; a clear criticism of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the editing of the film as nonsensical. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #59 w 0.129 The first 3rd of this movie felt alright, I was following along and then the tournament starts.....after that it was really all over the place VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.25 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.95 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.56 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — The opening was alright, but they criticize the rest of the film as unfocused. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Mild praise for the first third, but says the rest was all over the place. The criticism dominates. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter says only the first third was alright, then the film became 'all over the place' after the tournament; overall critical. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter found the first third merely alright and criticized the rest as 'all over the place'. Grok 4.7: negative — Starts alright, then criticizes the film as chaotic and unfocused. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — The opening was merely alright, while the rest of the movie felt disjointed. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Liked the opening but says the film became 'all over the place' after the tournament starts, implying overall disappointment. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter states that after the first third, the movie was 'really all over the place,' indicating disappointment. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #60 w 0.128 NOW DRIVE! pause THE CAR! VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.34 P(pos)=0.97 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Quotes dialogue from the film without expressing an opinion on its quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Just a quote from the film with comedic emphasis; no judgement of the movie expressed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Quoting or joking about a line from the film, with no judgment of the film's quality or a recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is simply a quote/reference without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Quote or joke only; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A quoted line with no opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Appears to be a quoted line or joke with no clear judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Quoting a line from the movie without expressing an opinion. | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #61 w 0.127 Lmao this stuck out with me as well. Can't believe they went with this take VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.612 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.84 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.57 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Expresses amusement and disbelief about a take, without clearly judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Amused disbelief at one creative choice; no clear judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Vague reaction to an unspecified element; 'Lmao' and 'can't believe' suggest incredulity but no clear overall judgment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Reacts to a specific choice or scene without expressing an overall opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Agrees a specific choice stood out; no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Reacting to an unspecified choice or interpretation, without clearly judging the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment reacts to an unspecified choice ('this take') without clearly judging the film's overall quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a specific detail without expressing a clear verdict on the film itself. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #62 w 0.126 I was like what the fuck is that VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.25 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.49 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.56 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Expresses surprise or confusion without clearly evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Ambiguous shocked reaction to something unspecified; no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Expresses surprise or confusion at something, but gives no clear judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Ambiguous reaction to something in the movie without a clear judgment on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Bewildered reaction only; no clear like or dislike of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Expresses surprise or confusion without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Expresses bewildered reaction to a moment but gives no clear judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Expresses strong shock and disapproval of the film. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #63 w 0.125 Maybe I'm just a generally happy guy but I really liked the movie. I dont over-analyse these things and I just sit back and enjoy it for what it is I really liked how when they hit things the camera shakes, and on especially hard hits the sound in the cinema was so loud enough… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.503 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.41 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.62 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly really liked the movie, praising fights, music, and spectacle despite minor disappointment about a skipped fight. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Really liked it, praising the fight camerawork, sound and music; only minor complaints about the skipped Guile fight. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they really liked the movie, praising fights, camerawork, sound and music; only minor complaints about skipped fights. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they really liked the movie, praising the action, sound, music, and overall fun factor. Grok 4.7: positive — Liked the movie overall; minor fight-skip complaints don't outweigh the praise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They repeatedly say they liked and enjoyed the movie, despite minor disappointment about a skipped fight. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.503 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they 'really liked the movie' and enjoyed the action, music, and fun tone. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #64 w 0.124 I was surprised at how 2000s Michael Bay this felt in humor. I haven’t seen a big budget film get as politically incorrect as this did in years. Gay jokes, sexist jokes, race jokes, etc. But then I can’t say it was a movie for right wing chuds either because it also got hella… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.957 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.88 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes the film’s politically incorrect humor and homoerotic elements without expressing an overall judgment. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes the film's politically incorrect humor tone without clearly saying whether they liked or disliked it. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes the film's humor and tone as surprising and politically incorrect, but never states whether they liked it or would recommend it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes the style of humor and tone without explicitly stating if they liked or disliked the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Describes humor and politics without liking or disliking the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter describes the film’s humor and jokes but does not say whether they liked or disliked it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER 0.957 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses tone and specific jokes without stating whether the commenter liked or disliked the film overall. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #65 w 0.123 Right wing chuds are the most homerotic people I know VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.79 P(pos)=0.98 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.66 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — The comment makes a political joke without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Political jab unrelated to judging the film; no opinion on the movie expressed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke/remark about right-wing people's homoeroticism; it gives no judgment of the film's quality or whether to recommend it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke/observation about political groups without offering any opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Political insult with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a political insult and gives no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a political jab at right-wing people, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses political groups and does not evaluate the film itself. | 0 | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #66 w 0.122 Dhalism and Honda are the surprise mvp’s of this movie (honorable mention goes to Sagat as well). Their roles are played mostly straight but with enough humor to be the most charismatic of the entire cast. Imagine if the entire movie matched their characters’ tone, or at least… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.47 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.90 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Praises select characters and one creative idea, but criticizes the film’s overall creativity, tone, and poorly lit fights. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Praises a few characters and one twist, but says creativity ends there, wishes the tone differed, and criticizes the lighting. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Praises Dhalsim, Honda, Sagat and a novel Ryu origin twist, but says creativity ends there and criticizes poor fight lighting. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Praises a few standout characters and one plot twist, while strongly criticizing the lack of creativity and terrible lighting. Grok 4.7: negative — Praises a few characters, but says creativity ends there and criticizes bad fight lighting. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — Praises several characters and a creative plot element, but criticizes the film’s limited creativity and fight-scene lighting. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.47 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Praises a few elements but concludes the creativity ends there and criticizes bad lighting and frustrating visual choices. | − | − | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | − | − |
| thread #67 w 0.121 Whoever did Dhalsim nailed his movement/idel animation VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.57 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.43 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises Dhalsim’s movement and idle animation as accurately executed. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the portrayal of Dhalsim's movement and idle animation; specific praise, no criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the Dhalsim movement and idle animation as nailed, a specific compliment about the film's execution, though not a verdict on the whole film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the actor's performance and physical portrayal of the character Dhalsim. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises Dhalsim’s movement and idle animation as nailed. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises Dhalsim’s animation as well-executed, expressing approval of an aspect of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the animation of Dhalsim's movement, a specific compliment about the film's craft. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses character animation without expressing a verdict on the film itself. | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #68 w 0.12 Totally agree about Dhalsim and Honda. I think it also might be because they seem like the nicest characters in the movie so they're easy to like. Like maybe 10 percent more sincerity? VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.94 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.85 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses why Dhalsim and Honda are likable characters without judging the film overall. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses why certain characters are likeable; no judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses why Dhalsim and Honda are likable characters, but gives no overall judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses specific characters' likability and traits without stating an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Agrees characters are likable; no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They imply the film or its characters would benefit from more sincerity, expressing a mild criticism. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses characters' likability and sincerity without giving a clear judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter likes specific characters in the movie and finds them sincere and easy to like. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | + |
| thread #69 w 0.12 My only complaint was that a lot of fight scenes were cut. Like why couldn't we see Guile vs Vega? Every tournament match should've been shown even if for 30 seconds. Cody Rhodes (plays Guile) is literally a pro wrestler, let him show some stuff and take some bumps lol VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.103 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.95 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.70 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes omitted fight scenes and the failure to showcase Guile’s wrestling abilities. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says 'only complaint' is cut fight scenes, implying overall enjoyment of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says their 'only complaint' is cut fight scenes, implying they otherwise liked the film; criticism is minor and wishes for more of it. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Saying 'my only complaint' implies overall satisfaction with the film despite wishing for more fight scenes. Grok 4.7: positive — Only complaint implies they otherwise enjoyed the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film for cutting fight scenes, without expressing a positive verdict overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — Complains about cut fight scenes but the 'only complaint' framing and playful tone suggest overall enjoyment of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praises the actor but criticizes the cut fight scenes. | + | + | 0 | − | + | + | + | + | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #70 w 0.119 Yeah they focused too much on the in-between stuff and WAY too much on Eric Andre. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.586 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.92 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.69 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the film for excessive focus on in-between material and Eric Andre. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's focus on filler material and excessive Eric Andre screen time; no praise offered. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's pacing and focus, saying too much time went to filler and Eric Andre; no praise offered. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the film's focus on filler content and overuse of Eric Andre. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the film for overfocusing on filler and Eric Andre. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film for overemphasizing filler material and Eric Andre. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Criticises the film's focus, saying it spent too much time on in-between stuff and Eric Andre; a mild but clear complaint. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the film's focus and screen time allocation, indicating dissatisfaction. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #71 w 0.118 If you don't want us to compare this Bison to the great Raul Julia's take, then don't have this one quote the "it was Tuesday" line. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.596 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.91 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.43 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the film for inviting an unfavorable comparison to Raul Julia’s Bison by reusing his iconic line. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes quoting Raul Julia's line, implying this Bison compares poorly to the original. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter implies this Bison pales next to Raul Julia's, criticizing the film for inviting an unfavorable comparison by reusing the iconic line. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Criticizes the portrayal and writing of the villain by comparing him unfavorably to a previous version. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the film for quoting Julia’s line and inviting an unfavorable comparison. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes this film's Bison for invoking Raul Julia's iconic line and inviting comparison. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment compares a character performance to another actor and critiques a quote choice; no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the film's poor imitation of Raul Julia's iconic Bison line. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | 0 | − |
| thread #72 w 0.117 It was done so terribly in this too lol VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.425 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.82 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Calls the film's execution terrible, indicating criticism. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Says something was done terribly in this film, criticizing its execution. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Says something was 'done so terribly' in this film, a clear criticism of the movie's execution. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes how an element of the film was executed, calling it 'done so terribly'. Grok 4.7: negative — Says something was done terribly in this film too. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize how something was handled in the film, calling it terribly done. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter says something was done 'so terribly' and laughs, clearly criticizing the film's execution. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter clearly dislikes the film, stating it was 'done so terribly'. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #73 w 0.116 Once he said that, i was like nah man, don't. His delivery was so dull compared to Raul's and it was a hail mary attempt to save his already horrible character portrayal. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.338 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.88 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes dull delivery and horrible character portrayal, expressing a negative judgment of the film's performance. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes an actor's dull delivery and horrible character portrayal, a negative judgment of the film's execution. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes an actor's dull delivery and calls the character portrayal horrible, a clear criticism of the film's execution with no praise. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the dull delivery and horrible character portrayal in the film. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes dull delivery and horrible character portrayal in the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the delivery and call the character portrayal horrible, expressing a negative view of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Criticizes the actor's delivery as dull and calls the character portrayal horrible, a clear negative judgment of the film's execution. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter calls the character portrayal horrible and criticizes the delivery as dull. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #74 w 0.115 This movie was absolutely idiotic, and I CANNOT WAIT to see the sequel. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.598 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calling it idiotic is outweighed by enthusiastic anticipation for the sequel, suggesting enjoyment despite its absurdity. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it idiotic, but eagerness for the sequel signals overall enjoyment, likely ironic or fun-dumb appreciation. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it idiotic but is enthusiastic, can't wait for the sequel; implies enjoyment and recommendation despite the silliness. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Despite calling it idiotic, the commenter clearly enjoyed it and eagerly anticipates the sequel. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it idiotic but eagerly wants the sequel GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Despite calling it idiotic, their eagerness for a sequel signals they enjoyed the movie. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — Calls the film idiotic, but is eagerly anticipating the sequel, so the overall lean is ambiguous; the sarcasm-laden enthusiasm conflicts with the insult. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Calling it idiotic while eagerly wanting a sequel shows enthusiastic enjoyment. | − | − | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + |
| thread #75 w 0.115 I see a lot of people online saying this movie is “for the fans not the critics” Okay well I’m a fan. I love street fighter to the point of entering SF6 tournaments. This movie is an awful mess. The editing is just all over the place that it feels like it straight up skips… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.959 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.95 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Calls the film an awful mess, criticizing editing, unresolved plots, excessive quipping, and music despite some enjoyable scenes. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Calls it an awful mess; criticizes editing, plot, comedy, music; only minor praise for anime scenes and fights. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Self-described fan calls the movie an awful mess, criticizing editing, unresolved plot, constant quipping, and music; only minor praise for anime scenes. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter explicitly calls the movie an 'awful mess' and heavily criticizes its editing, plot, comedy, and music. Grok 4.7: negative — Fan calls the film an awful, unresolved mess despite a few cool scenes. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They call the movie an awful mess and criticize its editing, plot, humor, and music, despite liking some fight and anime scenes. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Self-identified fan calls the movie an 'awful mess' with editing, tonal, and music complaints; only the anime scenes earned praise. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter is a major fan of the franchise but calls the movie an awful mess with severe flaws. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #76 w 0.114 I think "it's for the fans" is now shorthand for "stop criticizing this IP film that I liked". VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.226 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.80 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.80 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Critiques a defensive phrase used by fans, without expressing a verdict on the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Meta-commentary on fan defenses of IP films; no explicit judgement of this film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — General commentary on the phrase "it's for the fans"; no clear judgment of Street Fighter itself, only a vague implication that the commenter may have liked it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a meta-observation about fan discourse and criticism without expressing an opinion on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Meta comment on fan defenses, no judgment of this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly refer to this IP film as one they liked. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on fans' rhetoric about criticism; mentions liking the film but mostly commentary on the phrase, not a clear verdict. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses fan reception and IP criticism without reviewing the film itself. | − | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #77 w 0.113 What the hell happened with Zangief? He’s completely gone after the bar fight. Noah Centineo was a hard sell to me as Ken but the scene where his hair is down (no half up manbun) made him look extremely Ken so I was satisfied. Waste of Cammy to not put her in any fights. Even… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.834 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.83 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Despite approving Ken’s appearance, they mainly criticize Zangief’s disappearance and Cammy’s wasted potential. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Criticizes Zangief's disappearance and wasting Cammy, but satisfied with Ken; no clear overall lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Criticizes Zangief's disappearance and Cammy being wasted, but was satisfied with Ken's look; no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Satisfied with Ken's appearance, but criticizes the underuse and wasted potential of Zangief and Cammy. Grok 4.7: negative — Complains characters are wasted or vanish; only a minor casting note is positive. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They criticize character use and missing fights, but praise Centineo’s Ken look in one scene. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.834 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praises Noah Centineo's Ken and Dan Hibiki, but criticizes the treatment of Zangief and Cammy. | − | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 |
| thread #78 w 0.113 Having an actual UFC champion play a character that doesn't get to fight was quite a choice. Joe literally won the tournament without fighting anyone... VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.923 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.49 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the film for wasting a UFC champion in a role without fights and an unearned tournament victory. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Sarcastically criticizes wasting a UFC champion in a role with no fights; implies a poor creative choice. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Wry observation about casting and plot choices; it's mildly critical in tone but never states an overall judgment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a humorous observation about casting and plot without giving an overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: negative — Sarcastically criticizes casting and the tournament winner never fighting. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film’s choice to sideline an actual fighter and let Joe win without fighting. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on casting choice and a plot point without expressing an overall judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes a major creative choice and absurdity in the film. | + | + | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | − | − | 0 | − |
| thread #79 w 0.112 “For me, it was Tuesday…” Basically how I felt about this movie. Fun at times, with some nice easter eggs (i.e, the car, and the soundtrack). Story-wise rough, and the fights happening off screen were annoying. It’s enjoyable, but a movie I will probably forget about in about a… VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER -0.013 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.92 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): mixed — Found it fun and enjoyable, but criticized the rough story, off-screen fights, and forgettability. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Calls it fun and enjoyable with nice easter eggs, but criticizes rough story, off-screen fights, and forgettability. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Praises fun moments and easter eggs, enjoyable overall, but criticizes rough story, off-screen fights, and calls it forgettable; no clear lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Finds the film enjoyable and fun at times, but criticizes the rough story, off-screen fights, and calls it forgettable. Grok 4.7: mixed — Calls it fun and enjoyable, but criticizes the rough story, offscreen fights, and forgettability. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They find it enjoyable and fun, but criticize the story and off-screen fights and expect to forget it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — Enjoyable and fun with easter eggs, but story is rough and off-screen fights annoying; leans mildly forgettable rather than clearly positive or negative. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter describes the movie as enjoyable and fun at times, leaning positive despite some flaws. | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + |
| thread #80 w 0.111 Was Cammy’s actress trying to audition for Sindel, what was with that random angry scream when she was sitting with Bison? VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.511 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.04 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Questions an actress’s odd scream in one scene without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Jokes about one odd scene and the actress's choice without judging the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Jokey question about a specific scene and actress's performance; no overall judgement of whether the film is good or bad. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke about a specific character reaction in a scene without offering an overall verdict. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about one odd scream, no overall film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Criticizes Cammy’s performance and calls the scream random, expressing dissatisfaction with the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks about casting and a scene's odd delivery; no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a specific character's acting choice without expressing a general verdict on the film. | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #81 w 0.11 Funny enough her actress had more action in Mortal Kombat 2021 as Nitara VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.44 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.22 P(pos)=0.02 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.72 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Compares an actress’s action roles without judging Street Fighter’s quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Trivia comparing an actress's roles in another film; no judgement of Street Fighter itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Trivia comparing an actress's roles in different films; no judgment of Street Fighter itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a trivia comparison about an actress's role in another movie without judging the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Trivia about the actress in another film, no judgment of this movie. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Compares the actress’s action roles without judging Street Fighter. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Compares the actress's action work in another film; no judgement of Street Fighter itself expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Trivia comment about an actress's role in another film without judging this movie. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #82 w 0.11 The Tournament It's so bizarre that the World Warrior Tournament is theoretically the backbone of the plot, but is actually largely inconsequential in the grand scheme of things. Let's just consider Ryu for a moment; at the start of the film, Ryu has sworn off fighting, to the… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.999 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.19 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.56 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the film’s incoherent tournament plot, empty character turning point, and messy writing that makes characters look stupid. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Extended criticism of the messy, nonsensical plot structure and rewrites that make characters look stupid. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter criticizes the plot's tournament logic as incoherent, messy, and making characters look stupid, with no praise offered. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter heavily criticizes the film's plot, calling it messy, empty, nonsensical, and claiming it makes characters look stupid. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls the tournament plot messy, empty, and illogical, making characters look stupid. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film’s tournament plot as incoherent and messy, making its characters look stupid. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Extended critique of the plot's logic, calling the tournament pointless and characters look stupid; overall dissatisfied with the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the plot mechanics and character logic, describing the narrative as bizarre and messy. | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #83 w 0.109 movies a mess of sure, but one thing: akuma promised to kill the champion, so ryu's scene with honda is about him deciding he'd rather die himself than let ken die. that to me is quite clear. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.163 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.77 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Calls the movie a mess; the remaining discussion clarifies the plot rather than praising the film. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Concedes the movie is a mess; the rest just explains one scene's logic without praising the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Mostly plot interpretation of a scene; the 'a mess of sure' aside is a passing remark, not a clear overall verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter explicitly states the movie is "a mess" before clarifying a specific plot point. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls the movie a mess, then only clarifies a plot point. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Calls the movie a mess, expressing a negative view of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — VADER 0.163 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Acknowledges the movie is a 'mess' (negative) but offers clear praise for a specific narrative element. | + | − | 0 | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #84 w 0.108 My main complaint is that the fights had no consequences. It became a series of things happening without the plot progressing to the point of feeling tedious. The movie failed to make me care about anyone, which is hard to do. I’m easily swayed by movies generally. So I also… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.75 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Despite enjoying animation and occasional humor, they found the plot tedious, characters unengaging, and ending anticlimactic; rated 4/10. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticises the tedious plot, inconsequential fights and lack of investment; minor praise; rated 4/10. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Mostly criticism: tedious, uncaring characters, messy plot, anticlimactic ending; minor positives noted but gives 4/10. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the tedious plot, lack of character investment, and anticlimactic ending, giving it a 4/10. Grok 4.7: negative — Tedious, uncaring plot and 4/10 outweigh minor chuckles and animation praise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They call the film tedious, criticize its plot and characters, and rate it 4/10 despite enjoying a few scenes and jokes. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.75 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter lists multiple complaints about the plot and characters, giving it a 4/10 rating. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #85 w 0.108 It's a really messy movie, like a season worth of television put into a two hour movie. It really should've been a tv series. Editing is all over the place, tones clash regularly between serious and comedic. The fight choreography is good, you can really feel the hits.… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.432 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.81 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Despite substantial criticism, they rate it 6/10 and find it fun, campy, and cheesy, indicating a modest positive lean. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Praises fights, cast and fun camp, but criticizes messy editing, clashing tones and flaws; 6/10. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Praises fight choreography, performances, and fun, but criticizes messy editing, clashing tones, and structure; settles on a middling 6/10. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Gives a 6/10 rating, balancing criticism of messy editing and tone with praise for choreography, acting, and campy fun. Grok 4.7: mixed — Praises fights, acting, and fun, but calls it messy and very flawed at 6/10. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Despite substantial flaws, they call it fun and rate it 6/10. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — VADER 0.432 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Calls it messy and flawed with bad editing, but also fun, campy, and gives it a 6/10. | + | − | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #86 w 0.107 Setting up for a sequel instead of having a conclusive ending was an interesting choice. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.402 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.04 P(pos)=0.60 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.58 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Observes the sequel setup and inconclusive ending without clearly expressing approval or disapproval. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Remarks on the sequel-bait ending with ambiguous 'interesting choice' phrasing; no clear overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes the ending as an 'interesting choice' without clearly praising or criticizing the film; ambiguous, no explicit overall verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes an ambiguous observation about the ending without stating whether they liked the film overall. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Notes the sequel setup as interesting, without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Observes the sequel setup without clearly praising or criticizing the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on the ending choice and sequel setup without clearly judging whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizing the lack of a conclusive ending implies dissatisfaction with the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #87 w 0.107 Wow, what an inconsistent movie. Visually it looked good, and the characters looked as accurate as you could hope for. Nice Easter Eggs. The fighting choices were so weird. Guile and Zangief do one attack? The tournament essentially happens off screen. The fights they do show… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.833 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.94 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Despite praising visuals and accuracy, they predominantly criticize inconsistent filmmaking, poorly presented fights, and disorienting animation transitions. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Praises visuals, character accuracy, Easter eggs and animation; criticizes fight choices, editing and specials. No clear overall lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Praises visuals, accurate characters, Easter eggs and animation, but heavily criticizes fight choices, editing, and specials; calls it 'inconsistent' with no clear lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Calls the movie inconsistent, praising visuals and accuracy while criticizing the weird fighting choices, fast cuts, and pacing. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls it inconsistent and mainly criticizes the fights despite some visual praise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Despite visual and animation praise, they describe the movie as inconsistent and criticize its fights, editing, and handling of game specials. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.833 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praises the visuals and easter eggs, but criticizes the weird fighting choices and execution. | + | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − | − | 0 |
| thread #88 w 0.106 Watching this tomorrow, but I only have 1 question, any mention or tease of Sagat? VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.45 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.04 P(pos)=0.05 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.98 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Hasn't watched the film yet; only asks whether Sagat is mentioned or teased. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film yet; only asks whether Sagat is mentioned or teased. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film yet and is only asking whether Sagat appears; no judgement of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter has not seen the film yet and is just asking a question about a character. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Hasn't seen it yet; only asks about Sagat. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter has not seen the movie and asks whether Sagat is mentioned. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film yet and only asks whether Sagat is mentioned; no judgement of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — User has not seen the film yet and is asking a question about the plot. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #89 w 0.105 I think you’ll be satisfied with the first 10 minutes or so! VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.475 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.61 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Suggests the opening ten minutes will satisfy the viewer, expressing a favorable recommendation. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Backhanded remark implying only the opening is satisfying and the rest disappoints. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Only says the first 10 minutes will satisfy; a limited remark about part of the film, not an overall verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only addresses whether another user will like the first 10 minutes without judging the film overall. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Only predicts the opening may satisfy someone; no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Implies the movie is only satisfying for its first 10 minutes, suggesting disappointment overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — Vague hedged remark implying the opening is good but the rest may disappoint; no clear overall verdict. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a specific scene without a clear overall judgment of the film. | + | − | 0 | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #90 w 0.105 And stick around for the credits... VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.361 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.45 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.28 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Advises staying for the credits without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Only tells others to stay for the credits; it gives no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Only advises staying for the credits; no judgement of the film's quality is expressed. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment simply advises viewers to watch the credits without offering an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Credits tip only; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Offers advice about the credits without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Only a teaser about post-credits scenes; no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Just a tip to stay for the credits, no judgment on the film itself. | + | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #91 w 0.104 It’s pretty dumb but in a good way. I think Cody Rhodes stole the show. Every character was played perfectly VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.929 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.70 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls its dumbness enjoyable and praises Cody Rhodes and the casting of every character. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it dumb in a good way and praises the casting and performances, especially Cody Rhodes. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it dumb 'in a good way', says Cody Rhodes stole the show and every character was played perfectly. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter enjoyed the movie, calling it 'dumb in a good way' and praising the cast's performances. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it enjoyably dumb and praises the performances. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it dumb in a good way and praises the performances, especially Cody Rhodes. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the film dumb but in a good way, praises Cody Rhodes and says every character was played perfectly. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Calls it dumb in a good way, praises the acting and says characters were played perfectly. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #92 w 0.104 They nailed the tone and the visuals, but the forced and unfocused plot ruined the second half. It would've been much better with a simpler plot, a more straightforward tournament format movie VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.834 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.50 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Despite praising tone and visuals, they say the forced, unfocused plot ruined the second half. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Praises tone and visuals but says the unfocused plot ruined the second half; no clear overall lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Praises tone and visuals, but says the forced, unfocused plot ruined the second half; no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Praises the tone and visuals, but strongly criticizes the unfocused plot that ruined the second half. Grok 4.7: mixed — Praises tone and visuals, but says the plot ruined the second half. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Although the tone and visuals worked, the commenter says the plot ruined the second half. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Praises tone and visuals but says the forced, unfocused plot ruined the second half; leans negative overall. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praises the tone and visuals but criticizes the plot, resulting in a mixed overall stance. | − | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − | 0 |
| thread #93 w 0.103 The fight choreo wasn’t good enough to justify everything else being bad. The furious came out in this same year and also had atrocious dialogue and plotting, but because the fights were so good (and there were so many of them in the movie) critics and audiences alike were able… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.672 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.75 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the film's fight choreography as insufficient to compensate for its other poor elements. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Says fight choreography wasn't good enough to offset everything else being bad; unfavorable comparison to another film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Says the fight choreography wasn't good enough to make up for everything else being bad, so the overall verdict on the film is negative. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the fight choreography and states that 'everything else' in the movie was bad. Grok 4.7: negative — Fight choreography fails to justify everything else being bad. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They say the fight choreography fails to compensate for the film’s other bad elements. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter says the fight choreography doesn't justify the film's many bad elements, criticising its dialogue and plotting. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter describes everything else in the movie as bad and the fight choreography as insufficient to justify it. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #94 w 0.103 I don't know what happened with this film. Either there was a TON of studio interference or they passed the script through AI or something. Everything looks fine from a glance. Most of the actors fit their role well, the costume design is on-point, the fights ranged from eh to… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.98 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.94 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Despite praising individual elements, they strongly criticize the film’s incoherent scenes, dialogue, tonal whiplash, and ending. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Praises surface elements but heavily criticizes editing, dialogue, tone, and ending; overall says the film was derailed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Acknowledges some good surface elements but overall harshly criticizes editing, dialogue, tone, and ending as a derailed mess. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Despite praising some surface elements, the commenter concludes the film was derailed by messy editing, dialogue, and tonal whiplash. Grok 4.7: negative — Praises pieces but concludes the film was derailed and a mess. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Despite praising some elements, they criticize the film’s editing, dialogue, tone, characters, and ending as derailed and incoherent. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.98 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Praises aesthetics and casting, but strongly criticizes editing, dialogue, tone, and execution, concluding it was derailed. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #95 w 0.102 Chun Li’s big fight should not have been in so much darkness. Ridiculous, as Callina Liang was brilliant. I remember seeing Cody Rhodes in Arrow years ago as a Zombie Gangster and he stood out. So to see him do great work as Guile was amazing and hope he gets more recognition… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.838 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.78 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Criticizes the fight’s darkness but predominantly praises Callina Liang’s brilliance and Cody Rhodes’s great performance. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Criticizes dark lighting of Chun Li fight but praises Callina Liang and Cody Rhodes' performances; no clear overall lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises Liang as brilliant and Cody Rhodes' great work as Guile; the only complaint is the darkness of one fight scene. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Critiques the lighting in one fight scene, but strongly praises multiple actors' performances. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the leads as brilliant and amazing; only faults one fight’s lighting. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — Criticizes the darkly shot fight while praising the performances of Callina Liang and Cody Rhodes. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — VADER 0.838 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Criticizes the lighting of a fight scene, but praises the acting performances of the cast. | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #96 w 0.102 Does the casting of David Dastmalchian as M. Bison make any sense during the movie? VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Asks whether a casting choice makes sense without expressing a verdict on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Asks a question about casting without expressing any judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A question about casting and plot sense; the commenter gives no clear verdict on the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter is asking a question about the casting and appears not to have seen the movie yet. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Question about casting sense, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Asks whether the casting makes sense, but gives no opinion on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a casting question about a character without expressing any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only asks a question about the casting and does not express a verdict on the film. | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #97 w 0.101 The casting is easy to explain, at least for me. They clearly wanted to invoke Raul Julia, the actor who played Mr. Bison in that awful Van Damme Street Fighter movie back in the '90s. They saw how much people loved Raul Julia's performance and thought, "Let's do that again."… VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.84 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Explicitly calls Street Fighter awful, despite praising Raul Julia’s committed, entertaining performance. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes the new film's casting and screenwriters as clueless, saying their Bison approach fails. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter harshly criticizes the new film's casting and screenwriters as clueless, implying the film failed to recapture what worked, despite praising Raul Julia's performance in the old one. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter explicitly calls the 90s Street Fighter movie awful and criticizes the newer casting/writing. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls the film's writers detached and their Bison casting a failed imitation. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Criticizes the film’s casting and screenwriters, arguing they failed to recreate what made Raul Julia’s performance entertaining. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.0 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter calls the movie an 'awful Van Damme Street Fighter movie' and heavily criticizes the screenwriters. | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #98 w 0.101 They even include dialogue in his first scene of how he needs psycho power to grow to his true form. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.421 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.05 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.66 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes dialogue explaining a character’s transformation without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a scene's dialogue about psycho power without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a plot/dialogue detail about a character's first scene without expressing any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely describes a plot/dialogue detail without expressing an opinion on the quality of the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot detail about dialogue; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Points out a detail from a character’s first scene without evaluating the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a plot detail about dialogue in the first scene, with no judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses plot details and dialogue without expressing an opinion on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #99 w 0.1 Chun-Li: I’m dedicated to getting revenge on Bison Brands her hand to stay close to Bison Fights her own team to keep getting close to Bison Fights Bison and gets knocked out for a bit Wakes up to find Ken on the ground and somehow knows what on earth is going on with Ryu… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.883 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Explicitly calls it a bad movie and criticizes Chun-Li’s inconsistent motivations and inconsequential role in the final fight. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Mocks Chun-Li's incoherent arc and explicitly calls it 'such a bad movie'. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter mocks the plot's logic and Chun-Li's role in the finale, and states outright "Such a bad movie." Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter explicitly calls it a 'bad movie' and criticizes the plot and Chun-Li's character arc. Grok 4.7: negative — Explicitly calls it a bad movie and criticizes pointless plotting. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Calls it a bad movie and criticizes Chun-Li’s role as inconsequential. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter calls it 'Such a bad movie' and criticises its plotting, with no praise offered. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter explicitly states "Such a bad movie" and criticizes the plot and character arcs. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |