Primetime
← all movies. Each comment's label under every pathway (+ positive, − negative, 0 neutral / mixed / no verdict; hover a cell for the verdict).
Pick a pathway to show its verdict and rationale under every comment: VADER (old v1) · siebert+opinion (previous live) · Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) · GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE) · Claude Opus 5.5 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Gemini 4 Argon · Grok 4.7 · GPT-6 Luna (cheap) · Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) · Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap)
| comment (excerpt ≤280 chars) | VADER (old v1) | siebert+opinion (previous live) | Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) | GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE) | Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.7 | GPT-6 Luna (cheap) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank · score · bucket · Reddit · comments +/0/− | #4 80 Watch R 79 65/12/21 | #2 81 Watch R 80 51/29/18 | #3 68 Depends R 56 17/67/14 | #5 90 Depends R 97 53/42/3 | #5 90 Depends R 98 53/43/2 | #4 91 Watch R 99 51/46/1 | #5 91 Depends R 99 51/46/1 | #4 91 Watch R 99 51/46/1 | #4 89 Watch R 96 54/40/4 | #4 90 Watch R 98 54/42/2 | #5 88 Depends R 93 49/44/5 |
| thread #0 w 1.0 This world is full of weirdos, lunatics, and sociopaths. I hope Robert Pattinson has a chance to play all of them. He has like a dozen of the funniest line deliveries I've ever heard, but his physical performance really shines here. I was completely blown away by the way he… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.593 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.95 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.35 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Enthusiastically praises Pattinson’s hilarious line deliveries and physical performance in the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic praise of Pattinson's line deliveries and physical performance; 'completely blown away'. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Enthusiastically praises Pattinson's performance, funny line deliveries, and physical acting; 'completely blown away' signals a strong positive view of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Strongly praises Robert Pattinson's comedic line deliveries and physical performance in the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises Pattinson’s hilarious lines and standout physical performance. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter praises Pattinson’s line delivery and physical performance, saying they were completely blown away. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.593 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises Robert Pattinson's performance, stating they were completely blown away by it. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #1 w 0.707 The way he gets upset at the vending machine then calls the number and says, "This is Chris Hansen with Dateline NBC..." Like, please tell me that actually happened lmao. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.751 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.07 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.47 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Amused reaction to a specific scene and curiosity about its authenticity, without judging the film overall. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joking about a scene and wondering if it really happened; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment reacts to a scene with amusement and asks if it really happened, but gives no explicit verdict on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter discusses a specific funny moment without giving an overall verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Amused plot beat and joke; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They react to a scene and wonder whether it really happened, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a scene and asks whether it really happened; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing a specific funny scene and asking about its realism without judging the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #2 w 0.577 Also him answering the phone with “This is Chris Hansen” and his wife saying “I know…” Cracked me up. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.19 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.71 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises a comedic moment in the film, saying it cracked them up. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter enjoyed a specific funny scene, saying it cracked them up, which implies mild enjoyment. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says a specific scene cracked them up, expressing enjoyment of the film, though no overall verdict is given. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter shares a specific line they found funny without giving an overall verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Amused by one quoted gag, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They say a moment made them laugh, but offer no overall judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Quotes a funny moment from the film but gives no overall judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is only sharing a funny moment and quoting the movie without expressing an overall opinion. | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #3 w 0.5 Anna Faris was so good at being completely uncomfortable with him. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.214 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.73 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.38 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises Anna Faris’s performance in conveying discomfort. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises Anna Faris's performance; this reads as approval of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises Anna Faris's performance in the film, which is a positive judgement, though it doesn't address the whole film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises Anna Faris's performance in the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises Anna Faris's performance as very good. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises Anna Faris’s performance as effective and convincing. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises Anna Faris's performance as effective and good, implying approval of the film's awkward tension. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses an actor's performance without giving an overall judgment of the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #4 w 0.447 Was in for so little time but did great. Amazing feet acting VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.916 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.60 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.61 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises a brief performance as great, with enthusiastic appreciation of the acting. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joking praise of a brief cameo's 'feet acting'; no judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter praises an actor's performance ('did great', 'Amazing... acting') in the film, indicating a favorable view, though the praise is brief and focused on one performer. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the acting performance in the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises a brief performance as great and amazing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises the brief performance as great, expressing a positive view. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the performance as amazing, implying they liked the film's acting despite brief screen time. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the performance with 'did great' and 'Amazing'. | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #5 w 0.408 Might have been my favorite part of the movie. I was dyin' VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.459 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.73 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls a moment their favorite part and enthusiastically describes laughing at it. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls a scene their favorite part and says they were laughing hard, signaling enjoyment of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls a part 'maybe my favorite part of the movie' and says they were laughing hard, indicating enjoyment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter expresses strong enjoyment of a specific scene, calling it their favorite part and finding it hilarious. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls a scene their favorite part and found it hilarious. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calling it a favorite part of the movie expresses clear enjoyment. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Says a scene was their favorite part of the movie, with enthusiastic laughter, indicating enjoyment of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising a part of the movie as a favorite indicates an overall positive verdict. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #6 w 0.378 I get the sense that Chris Hansen always introduces himself as "Chris Hansen with Dateline NBC", regardless of how mundane the situation. You can look up videos of his Cameo account where he starts the videos by saying "happy birthday" or whatever and then the next 2 minutes of… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.784 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.02 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.61 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Finds the film’s depiction of Chris Hansen very funny and informative. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls the film's depiction of Chris Hansen very funny and informative, praising this aspect of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter shares trivia about Chris Hansen's real-life habits and how the character is based on them; no explicit judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the film's character depiction, finding the premise behind it 'both very funny and extremely informative'. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Observes Hansen portrayal is funny and informative; no overall film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the film’s depiction of Chris Hansen as funny and informative. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses Chris Hansen's real-life Cameo habit and the film's depiction, but gives no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a character depiction and actor behavior without judging the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #7 w 0.354 Kat Tenbarge, another former NBC journalist, wrote a piece on him years (decades?) after he left NBC and said that his email was ChrisHansenNBC@gmail . So, yes he definitely does lol. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.802 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.04 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.76 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses a journalist’s email address, without expressing any opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Trivia about Chris Hansen's email; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment shares trivia about Chris Hansen's email address from a journalist's article, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment shares trivia about a real-life journalist and does not evaluate the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Trivia about Chris Hansen's email, no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses an email address and a former journalist, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses real-world journalism and a person's email, not a judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses real-life journalist trivia and email addresses without mentioning or judging the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #8 w 0.333 "Bob Vance, Vance Refrigeration" VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.29 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.38 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — The comment quotes a character introduction without expressing any judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Just a joke quote referencing The Office; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A quoted line from The Office; a joke/quote with no judgement of the film Primetime. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is just a quote/reference from The Office with no opinion on the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Just a quote/joke with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A quoted line with no opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Just a quoted line of dialogue or a name reference with no judgement of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Just a quote from the TV show The Office, unrelated to film review. | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #9 w 0.316 There is no way that actually happened but it is hilarious and adding stuff like that to movie is a great decision VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.916 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.78 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.43 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls the scene hilarious and praises its inclusion as a great filmmaking decision. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls the scene hilarious and praises including it as a great decision, though doubting its realism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter calls the added scene hilarious and a great decision for the movie, expressing approval of the film's choices. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises a humorous addition to the film, calling it a great decision. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the addition hilarious and a great decision. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They find the movie hilarious and praise the decision to include the implausible detail. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter calls the film hilarious and praises the creative decision to add that element; clear approval. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls the movie hilarious and says adding that stuff is a great decision. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #10 w 0.302 For everyone else, it's a minor inconvenience to get something stuck in a vending machine. To Chris Hansen, getting something stuck in a vending machine is a major inconvenience. There's also a thing I noticed how Hansen got a thing for sweets, at one point he eats a Fruit… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.624 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.07 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.79 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses a character’s vending machine experience and eating habits without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Humorous observations about Chris Hansen's snacking and vending machine scene, with no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Joking observations about a character's vending machine mishap and snack habits; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely describes character details and plot moments without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Observes Hansen's vending-machine and sweets habits without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment notes character details and a humorous inconvenience but gives no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is trivia and observations about plot details and a character, with no stated judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot and character details without expressing a judgment on the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #11 w 0.289 Skylar stole the show but I just have high expectations for Pattinson. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.84 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises Skylar’s standout performance; high expectations for Pattinson do not express clear criticism of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Praises Skylar's standout performance but implies Pattinson fell short of high expectations; no clear overall lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Praises Skylar's standout performance but implies Pattinson fell short of high expectations; mild praise and mild criticism, no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Praises one actor's standout performance while expressing mild disappointment in another actor, giving no clear overall film verdict. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Compares performances only; no clear judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They praise Skylar while implying Pattinson fell short of their expectations. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — Praises Skylar's performance but says they had high expectations for Pattinson, implying he fell short; overall lean unclear. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praise for one actor but disappointment regarding Pattinson's performance shows a balanced view. | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #12 w 0.277 He's great too. The scene where he just starts doing an impression of Pattinson as Hansen might be the hardest I laughed in a movie where I laughed a lot VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.9 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.55 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.69 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the performance and describes laughing frequently, including an exceptionally funny scene. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises an actor and says the film made them laugh a lot, a favorable verdict. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises an actor and says a scene was the hardest they laughed in a movie they laughed a lot in. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises a performance and notes they laughed a lot throughout the movie. Grok 4.7: positive — Laughed a lot and praises a hilarious scene and performance. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the scene as hilarious and say they laughed a lot throughout the movie. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises an actor and says they laughed hard, laughing a lot in the movie; clearly enjoyed it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the actor and humor, stating it caused intense laughter. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #13 w 0.267 literally did the sit up meme when that shit happened. so good so funny VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.567 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.71 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.67 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls the moment “so good so funny,” expressing clear enjoyment. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter reacted strongly to a scene and called it "so good so funny," clear enjoyment. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter enthusiastically praises a moment in the film as 'so good so funny', indicating they enjoyed it. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises a moment in the film as "so good so funny". Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the film good and funny; enthusiastic reaction. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the moment—and by implication the film—so good and funny. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter enthusiastically says a scene was 'so good so funny', expressing clear enjoyment of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the movie as 'so good so funny'. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #14 w 0.258 I love how when Hansen is lying on his hotel room and we see him watching Lost with a blank stare, the imagery of the Lost episode as he's trying to figure out what can he do to outdo Lost it perfectly captures how unhinged and volatile he is. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.026 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.10 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.77 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the scene’s imagery for perfectly capturing Hansen’s unhinged and volatile character. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises a scene's imagery for perfectly capturing the character's unhinged state; character criticism isn't film criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter explicitly loves a specific scene and says it perfectly captures the character, expressing praise for the film's craft. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises a specific scene's imagery and how effectively it captures the character's nature. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises a scene's imagery for perfectly capturing the character. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the scene’s imagery for effectively capturing Hansen’s unhinged, volatile nature. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they 'love' the scene and praises how it captures the character, a clear approving judgment of the film's craft. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the effective character imagery and execution in the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #15 w 0.25 The network exec calling him and asking how he's going to compete with polar bears really highlighted the absurdity of the whole situation VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.22 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.41 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses a scene highlighting the situation’s absurdity without expressing an opinion on the film’s quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a scene's theme without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on a scene's absurdity as plot discussion; no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment describes a scene and its thematic meaning without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot observation about a scene; no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise how effectively the scene highlights the situation's absurdity. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a plot moment and notes its absurdity without any judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a specific plot point and theme without expressing a judgment or recommendation about the film itself. | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #16 w 0.243 It may not do Beggars numbers but that scene with him slowly pointing his finger gun at Decoy Dan's crotch may be his next meme VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.477 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.89 P(pos)=0.96 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Predicts a scene becoming a meme and compares popularity, without judging the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on box office and meme potential of a scene without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on a scene's meme potential and box office speculation without clearly stating whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Predicts a specific scene's meme potential without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Meme speculation about one scene, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Predicts a scene may become a meme but gives no clear opinion of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a specific scene and its meme potential, plus a box-office aside, without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a specific scene and meme potential without giving an overall verdict on the film. | − | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #17 w 0.236 The mouthwash scene took me by surprise and got a good laugh outta me. I can’t wait for that gif. This movie is filled with gif potential. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.823 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.38 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.60 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Enjoyed the mouthwash scene’s humor and enthusiastically praised the movie’s gif potential. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enjoyed the mouthwash scene, laughed, and says the movie is full of memorable gif-worthy moments. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter enjoyed a scene, laughed, and praised the movie as full of gif-worthy moments, implying a favorable view. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter enjoyed a funny scene and praised the movie's meme/gif potential. Grok 4.7: positive — Enjoyed a funny scene and praises the movie's gif-worthy moments. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The scene made them laugh, and they praise the movie’s abundance of memorable, gif-worthy moments. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter laughed at a scene, anticipates a gif, and says the film is full of gif potential, all enthusiastic. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter enjoys the movie's comedic scenes and praises its high gif potential. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #18 w 0.229 Everyone will talk about Robert, but Skylar Gisondo was fucking excellent. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.757 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.41 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Enthusiastically praises Skylar Gisondo's performance in the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises Skylar Gisondo's performance as excellent, implying approval of the film's acting. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter praises Skylar Gisondo's performance as 'excellent', a clear positive judgment of the film's acting. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter strongly praises the acting performances in the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises a performance as excellent, a positive film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises Skylar Gisondo’s performance as excellent, indicating a positive view of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises Skylar Gisondo's performance as 'fucking excellent', signaling a favorable view of the film's acting. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Strong praise for one of the actors indicates a positive verdict on the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #19 w 0.224 Skylar really blew me away, standing up scene for scene with Pattinson in this movie was an incredibly difficult task VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.42 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.88 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.61 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Strongly praises Skylar’s performance and ability to match Pattinson, expressing admiration for the film’s acting. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises Skylar's performance as impressive, holding her own against Pattinson; implies approval of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter praises Skylar's performance as impressive, holding their own against Pattinson, which signals a favorable view of the film's acting. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter strongly praises the acting performances in the movie. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises a standout performance that impressed them in the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter praises Skylar’s performance and ability to hold their own opposite Pattinson. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says the lead actress 'blew me away' and praises her performance, a clear positive verdict on the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising the actor's performance against the lead indicates a positive view of the film. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #20 w 0.218 I thought Merritt Wever was incredible too. Never seen her work before but having worked in the film industry she nailed that persona so well. I love that she always had this sweet, saccharine tone—kind of like a mom, even though as Hansen points out she has no kids of her own.… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.978 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.90 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Enthusiastically praises Merritt Wever’s performance, character portrayal, and a specific scene. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic praise of Merritt Wever's performance and a specific scene; no criticism of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Enthusiastically praises Merritt Wever's performance and a specific scene as incredible and great, implying appreciation of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Enthusiastically praises an actor's performance and a specific scene in the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises Wever’s performance and a key scene as great. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise Wever’s performance and describe a scene as great, indicating they liked the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the lead actress's performance as incredible and well-executed, with admiring analysis of her scenes; no criticism of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the actor's performance and specific scenes, showing clear enjoyment of the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #21 w 0.213 ^^^Merritt never disappoints. I feel like if she brings the best out of everyone because everyone knows she always brings her A game. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.835 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.88 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.71 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises Merritt’s consistently excellent performance and her ability to elevate the rest of the cast. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises Merritt's performance and says she elevates the whole cast, implying approval of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises Merritt's consistent performance and says she brings out the best in everyone, which reads as approval of the film's acting. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment praises an actress's general talent and work ethic without offering a specific verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Praises an actress's consistency, not the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises Merritt’s performance and her positive impact on the cast, implying approval of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the director Merritt as never disappointing and bringing out the best in everyone, implying approval of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the lead actor and implies high quality of work. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + |
| thread #22 w 0.209 She's great in Severance even though it's not the biggest role VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.625 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.86 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.78 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Praises an actress in Severance, not her performance or the film Primetime. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Praises an actress's work in Severance, a different show; no judgement of Primetime itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Praises an actress's performance in a different work (Severance), not a verdict on Primetime itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment praises an actress's performance in another show, Severance, without judging the film Primetime. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Praises her role in Severance, not this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on her role in Severance, not on the film Primetime. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Praises the actress in a different show (Severance), not giving a judgement of the film Primetime itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses an actor's role in a different show, not the film itself. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #23 w 0.204 Skyler Gisondo's Dan is the lamb as Robert Pattinson's Hansen is the wolf like prey and predator. The boyish yet aspiring attitude of a young actor trying to make his name contrast to the volatile and erratic television veteran makes a very great dynamic to watch on screen. Dan… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.957 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.03 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.70 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the compelling character dynamic and how the baseball scene and costumes effectively develop the characters. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the character dynamic as 'very great' and the scene for amplifying characters so well. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the lead actors' dynamic as 'very great to watch' and says the baseball scene and costumes amplified the characters well. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the characters' 'very great dynamic to watch on screen' and how well a scene and costuming amplified their characters. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the character dynamic as great and well amplified on screen. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the characters’ on-screen dynamic and says their scene amplifies the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the actors' dynamic and how well the characters are amplified, calling it a great dynamic to watch on screen. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the character dynamics and execution, stating it makes a 'very great dynamic to watch'. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #24 w 0.2 He was terrific - Rent at the end was chilling VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.459 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.94 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.50 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the performance as terrific and the ending as chilling. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the actor's performance as terrific and the ending as chilling, which reads as approval of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls the performance terrific and the ending chilling, which is praise of the film's dark content, so the verdict is positive. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises a performance as 'terrific' and calls the ending 'chilling' in an admiring way. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the performance and finds the ending chilling in a complimentary way. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises his performance and describes the ending as chilling, expressing admiration for the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the performance as terrific and calls a scene chilling, which reads as approval of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising the acting ('terrific') and the ending ('chilling') indicates a positive verdict. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #25 w 0.196 Respect for Merritt Weaver too. She was amazing. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.784 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.43 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.44 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises Merritt Weaver’s performance as amazing, expressing appreciation for the film’s acting. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises Merritt Wever's performance as amazing, implying a favorable view of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises Merritt Wever's performance as amazing, which signals a favorable view of the film, though the comment focuses on one actor. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter strongly praises the performance of an actress in the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises Merritt Wever's performance as amazing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises Merritt Wever’s performance, expressing a positive view of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises actor Merritt Weaver's performance as amazing, implying approval of the film's acting. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the lead actor's performance, indicating a favorable view of the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #26 w 0.192 Skyler Gisondo going from 13 year old boy voice to Hansen voice and mannerisms was top tier. Incredible movie VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.202 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.57 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls the movie incredible and praises Skyler Gisondo’s vocal transformation and mannerisms. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises Gisondo's performance as top tier and calls it an incredible movie. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises Skyler Gisondo's performance as top tier and calls it an incredible movie. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises an actor's performance as 'top tier' and calls it an 'Incredible movie'. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the performance top tier and the movie incredible. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the performance top tier and the movie incredible. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the actor's performance as top tier and calls the movie incredible. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls it an 'Incredible movie' and praises the acting. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #27 w 0.189 Skylar was excellent VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.572 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.68 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises Skylar’s performance as excellent, expressing a positive judgment of an aspect of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises a performance in the film; implies positive view of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises a performance or character as 'excellent', which is a favorable judgment of the film's quality, though brief. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter directly praises a performance or character in the film as excellent. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises Skylar's performance as excellent. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises Skylar’s performance, expressing a positive impression of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the performance of Skylar, implying approval of the film's acting and overall quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising the lead actor's performance indicates a positive view of the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #28 w 0.186 That scene they did with the Rabbi made me feel so uneasy. Lowkey terrifying honestly. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.177 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.83 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.30 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes a scene as unsettling and terrifying without judging the film’s quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calling the Rabbi scene unsettling and terrifying reads as appreciation of its effective tension, with no criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes feeling uneasy and terrified by a scene, but gives no explicit judgement of the film's quality; unease may be intended effect. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Expresses effective emotional impact ('uneasy', 'terrifying') from a scene, which serves as praise for dark/disturbing content. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls a scene terrifying and uneasy, praising its scare effect. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They describe the scene as effectively terrifying, praising its impact rather than criticizing the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Describes the scene as 'lowkey terrifying' and unsettling, which is praise of disturbing content, not criticism of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising the scene as terrifying indicates effective filmmaking and a positive reception of the movie's impact. | + | − | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #29 w 0.183 I was so scared during the India scene. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.578 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.46 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.30 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes feeling scared during a scene without judging the film’s quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes an emotional reaction to one scene without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Says they were scared during a scene, but gives no explicit judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes an emotional reaction to a specific scene without expressing overall approval or disapproval of the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Being scared by a scene praises the film's effectiveness. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes being scared during one scene without judging the film or recommending it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a fear reaction to a scene but gives no overall judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising the film's ability to create genuine fear indicates a positive viewing experience. | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | + |
| thread #30 w 0.18 The juxtaposition of Dan in the place of Hansen recounting his India story was incredible, you get the sense of pure terror and fear on what he saw which culminated into this obsession/need to cleanse evil. Hansen saw the helplessness and madness in the Indian village's… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.984 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.31 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.62 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls the scene’s juxtaposition incredible and praises its portrayal of terror and psychological motivation. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls the juxtaposition of Dan recounting Hansen's India story incredible; praises its emotional depth. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls the juxtaposition of Dan and Hansen's India story 'incredible' and analyzes it admiringly, indicating a positive view of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises a specific storytelling juxtaposition in the film as 'incredible' and emotionally effective. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the scene juxtaposition incredible and praises its terror and thematic impact. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the film’s juxtaposition incredible and praises how it conveys terror, fear, and human desperation. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the juxtaposition 'incredible' and praises the film's depiction of terror and tragedy with admiration. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises a scene as incredible and effectively conveys the emotional weight and character motivation. | − | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #31 w 0.177 My friend I saw the movie with thought he was supposed to be playing Ted Dansen and I can’t stop laughing. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.718 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.81 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.70 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Shares a funny misunderstanding about an actor’s portrayal without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Anecdote about a friend's mistaken casting idea; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Anecdote about a friend's confusion over a casting detail; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment shares a funny anecdote about a friend's misunderstanding without judging the quality of the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about a friend's actor mix-up, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment shares a humorous anecdote about the viewing, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Joke about a friend misidentifying an actor/character; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment shares a joke and an anecdote about the viewing experience without judging the film itself. | + | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #32 w 0.174 The best part is . . . it felt like there was a chance that he made all of that shit up. He is an unreliable narrator. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.625 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.49 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.41 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film’s ambiguity and unreliable narrator as its best feature. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls the unreliable-narrator ambiguity 'the best part', which is praise for the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls the ambiguity and unreliable narrator 'the best part', which is praise of the film's storytelling. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Uses 'the best part is' to praise the film's effective use of an unreliable narrator. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the unreliable-narrator ambiguity the best part of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calling the unreliable-narrator ambiguity the best part expresses clear appreciation of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the film's unreliable narrator ambiguity as 'the best part', indicating a favorable verdict on the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plot elements and character reliability without expressing a clear opinion on the film's quality. | + | − | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #33 w 0.171 maybe it wasn't intentional, but I love the commentary they did with the whole demon mask / 'ancient evil' thing on how when predators are often caught for their crimes, especially when celebrities are caught, people will make narratives about how these people did these things,… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.773 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.41 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.90 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly loves the film's perceived commentary on predators and narratives of demonic influence. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter says they love the film's commentary on demonizing predators; appreciative interpretation of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they 'love the commentary' in the film and appreciates its themes, indicating a favorable view despite the overthinking caveat. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the film's thematic commentary regarding predators and demonic narratives. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly loves the film's thematic commentary on evil and predators. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the film’s commentary on people attributing predators’ crimes to supernatural forces. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER -0.773 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses thematic interpretation and overthinking the plot without stating a clear verdict on the film. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #34 w 0.169 I mean that's basically what the hypocritical DA said in his argument in court. Id wager the themes are related deliberately VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.67 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.31 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses a character’s courtroom argument and thematic connections without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot and thematic connections without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot and themes, speculating on deliberate thematic links, without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment discusses plot points and themes without expressing a judgment or opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Thematic plot discussion only, no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a thematic connection to the DA’s argument, but gives no opinion on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plot/themes and a courtroom argument in the film without expressing any judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses plot themes and court arguments without expressing a judgment or recommendation for the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #35 w 0.167 The preceding fallout of the affair combined with the rabbi gave this offputting vibe and it kind of worked. Like, the whole room felt disgusting. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.226 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.75 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Says the offputting atmosphere worked, praising the film’s ability to make the room feel disgusting. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says the off-putting, disgusting atmosphere 'kind of worked' — praising the film's intended discomfort. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says the offputting, disgusting vibe 'kind of worked', praising the film's atmosphere rather than criticizing it, though the praise is mild. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the film's effective, intentionally off-putting and disgusting atmosphere, stating that 'it kind of worked'. Grok 4.7: positive — Offputting, disgusting atmosphere 'kind of worked'—praise of the film's vibe. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The unsettling, disgusting atmosphere is praised as effective; the offputting vibe kind of worked. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says the offputting, disgusting atmosphere 'kind of worked', praising the film's unsettling effect despite no explicit recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter describes the offputting vibe as something that 'kind of worked', indicating a favorable reception. | − | − | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #36 w 0.164 For the first time, Hansen loses his cool and temper as we see him be confronted by someone who challenges him on his tactics and morality. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.511 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.09 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes a character's reaction and moral confrontation without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a scene's content without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a plot moment involving the character Hansen without offering any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely describes the plot or content of the film without expressing a personal opinion on its quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Describes a scene and character reaction without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a character moment without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot description of a character moment; no judgement of the film's quality or whether the commenter liked it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses plot details and character actions without expressing a judgment or recommendation about the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #37 w 0.162 For a moment I was absolutely drawn in like, oh fuck, is he gonna straight up kill him? can Hansen physically stop him? It was really really well done. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.249 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.88 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the scene as really well done and describes being thoroughly drawn into its suspense. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter was gripped by a tense scene and calls it 'really really well done.' Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter was absorbed by the tense scene and explicitly says it was 'really really well done', praising the film's craft. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter felt deeply drawn in by the suspense and explicitly praised it as "really really well done." Grok 4.7: positive — Praises a tense scene as well done and absorbing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the suspense and say the moment was really well done. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter was drawn in by the tension and says the scene was 'really really well done'. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the scene as really well done and engaging. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #38 w 0.16 So, Robert Pattinson's take on Chris Hansen is one of the squirreliest creeps I've ever seen in a movie. The way he recites those explicit online messages to himself as a pre-show mantra is pretty disturbing, and it's literally the last we hear from him. Chris Hansen is… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.771 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.98 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Analyzes the character’s disturbing behavior and motivations without judging the film’s quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Analyzes Pattinson's creepy portrayal of Hansen and the film's themes without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses the character and Hansen's portrayal and themes without explicitly judging the film; 'squirreliest creeps' describes the character, not a clear verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter analyzes the main character's disturbing portrayal without expressing whether they liked or disliked the film itself. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises Pattinson’s disturbing performance and the film’s pointed portrayal of Hansen. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Analyzes Hansen’s characterization and the film’s themes without judging whether the film itself is good or recommendable. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Analyzes the character and his portrayal and themes without stating whether the commenter liked or would recommend the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the film's portrayal of the protagonist, viewing him as a creepy carnival barker. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #39 w 0.158 I find it really interesting that it’s not only the last we hear from him, it’s also the very first thing we hear from him. You literally think for a couple seconds in the beginning that he is the predator. The show consumes every aspect of his life, it is his life, “With… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.94 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.82 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film’s characterization and storytelling choices, calling the portrayal fantastic and Robert’s performance Oscar-worthy. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the film's choices and calls the portrayal fantastic and Oscar-worthy. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter praises the film's storytelling choices and calls the portrayal fantastic, predicting an Oscar run for the lead. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the narrative choices, calls it a 'fantastic portrayal', and predicts an Oscar run for the lead. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the portrayal and narrative choices; calls it fantastic and Oscar-worthy. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the portrayal fantastic and praises Robert’s performance, indicating strong approval of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.94 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the fantastic portrayal and acting performance in the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #40 w 0.156 He very much is framed as the real predator. In so many scenes the way he is lurking in the background, watching and waiting to strike. He just isn’t a sex predator but he very much acts like a beast stalking prey. Idk I think the predator thing opens up an interesting… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.723 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.47 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.68 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls the film fascinating and riveting, wants an immediate rewatch, and anticipates appreciating it further. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a fascinating and riveting film, wants to rewatch it instantly, and looks forward to discussing it. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls the film 'fascinating and riveting', wants to rewatch it immediately, and looks forward to further discussion; the character analysis is appreciative. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter calls it a 'fascinating and riveting film' and wants to rewatch it immediately. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the film fascinating and riveting and wants to rewatch it immediately. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it a fascinating, riveting film and says they immediately want to rewatch it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.723 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls the movie a fascinating and riveting film and expresses a strong desire to rewatch it immediately. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #41 w 0.154 Referring to his practicing of line readings (contrary to his denials of being an actor) as mantras is a really interesting way to look at it. He's both trying to get his delivery right and hyping himself up to view these creeps as the manifestation of evil. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.342 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.50 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.34 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses character motivations and an interpretation of his behavior without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Interprets a character's behavior and engages with another reading; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Interpretive analysis of the protagonist's line-reading practice as mantras; engages thoughtfully but gives no explicit overall judgment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment analyzes character behavior and themes without expressing a clear verdict on the film's overall quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character analysis and interpretation only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They find an interpretation of the character interesting, but do not judge the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER -0.342 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses character motivation and plot details without expressing any judgment or verdict on the film. | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #42 w 0.152 I’d recommend watching the doc predators if you haven’t VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.361 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.43 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Recommends a different documentary, not the film Primetime. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Recommends a different documentary; no judgement expressed about this film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Recommends a different documentary (Predators) and gives no judgement of Primetime itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Recommends a related documentary without expressing an opinion on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Recommends another documentary, no judgment of this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Recommends a different documentary without judging this film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Recommends a different show (Dateline-style docs 'Predators'), not a judgement of Primetime itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter recommends a different documentary entirely, not expressing a verdict on Primetime. | + | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #43 w 0.151 Chris Hansen is ostensibly a journalist, but what exactly is the journalism here? He comes off more like a carnival barker gleefully putting freaks on display for the public to hoot and holler at. That's basically what To Catch A Predator was. And a lot of us ate it up . VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.475 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.95 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.62 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Critiques Chris Hansen and To Catch a Predator, without expressing a verdict on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Criticizes Chris Hansen and To Catch A Predator, not the film itself; no judgement of the movie. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Criticizes Chris Hansen and To Catch A Predator's journalism, not clearly delivering a verdict on the film Primetime itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses Chris Hansen and the real-life inspiration (To Catch a Predator) without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Critiques Hansen and TCAP as spectacle, not this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Critiques Chris Hansen and To Catch A Predator, but gives no clear judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Criticizes Chris Hansen and To Catch A Predator, not the film Primetime's quality or whether to recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the show's exploitative nature, comparing it to a carnival rather than real journalism. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #44 w 0.149 Law enforcement constantly loving what Hansen is doing and wanting photos with him is a really brilliant way of calling out the type of people that worship him. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.88 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.65 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.43 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film’s portrayal of law enforcement as a brilliant critique of Hansen’s admirers. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls the film's portrayal of law enforcement worshipping Hansen a brilliant piece of commentary. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the film's depiction of law enforcement admiring Hansen as a 'really brilliant' way of criticizing his worshippers. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises a narrative element of the film as 'really brilliant'. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises a brilliant storytelling choice that critiques Hansen worshippers. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the film’s portrayal a brilliant way to criticize people who admire Hansen. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the film's satire as 'a really brilliant way' of calling out Hansen's fans, judging the film's execution favorably. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises a brilliant narrative choice in the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #45 w 0.147 That traffic stop scene with the cop who wrote him a fan letter tells you everything you need to know about the kind of cops who idolize a guy like Chris Hansen. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.382 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.80 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Interprets a scene and criticizes cops who idolize Hansen, without evaluating the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commentary on a scene and on real-world cops; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on a scene and what it says about characters/Chris Hansen's fans, without explicitly judging the film's quality or recommending it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment discusses a specific scene and its thematic meaning without expressing an opinion on the movie's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Scene commentary about cops idolizing Hansen, no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment interprets what the traffic-stop scene says about certain cops, without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a scene's thematic meaning about cops idolizing Chris Hansen; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a scene and themes without expressing a judgment or verdict on the film itself. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #46 w 0.146 I love how they showed this pathetic cop, going from locking himself out of his car to his very lonely Subway dinner with Jared watching over him. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.453 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises how the film portrays the cop's pathetic, lonely life. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Expresses enjoyment of how the film portrayed the pathetic cop's lonely evening; praise of a filmmaking choice. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they love how the film portrayed the pathetic cop; praise of a depiction, not criticism of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises how the film portrayed a specific character and sequence. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises how the film depicts the cop's pathetic, lonely moments. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly love how the film depicts the cop’s pathetic, lonely moments. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — The commenter says they love how the film shows the cop's pathetic, lonely arc, expressing approval of the filmmaking choices. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses a specific scene and character details without giving an overall judgment on the film. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #47 w 0.144 Also the irony of Jared watching over them given what eventually happened to him. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.052 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.09 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.41 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses irony surrounding Jared and subsequent events without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on narrative irony about a character's fate without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment notes an ironic plot detail about a character's fate; it gives no judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes an observation about a character or detail in the film without expressing a judgment on the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot irony about a character, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Notes an ironic plot detail without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a plot irony involving a character without expressing any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Plot discussion and irony observation without a film judgment. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #48 w 0.143 I felt so old when only like 3 people chuckled at Fogle VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.572 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.53 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.47 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Comments on audience recognition of a reference, without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Anecdote about audience reaction to a joke; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment is about audience reaction to a reference in the screening and the commenter feeling old; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment shares an anecdote about the theater audience's reaction without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Audience joke about a reference, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They mention the audience reaction to a joke, without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is about audience reaction to a joke and feeling old; it gives no clear judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a personal anecdote about audience reaction, not a judgment of the film itself. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #50 w 0.14 Me if I could only think for 8 seconds about things VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.38 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A joke about limited thinking, with no clear judgment of the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke comment, likely about a character's behavior; it offers no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A vague joke about thinking for only 8 seconds, with no clear judgment of the film's quality or a recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a joke or reaction without any clear judgment of the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke with no judgment of the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke without a clear judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Cryptic joke-style comment with no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a joke or meme unrelated to the film's quality. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #51 w 0.139 He wasnt catching them, perverted Justice and the police did. He turned it into a spectical, into entertainment where people can indulge in being as vindictive as possible and feel like good people for calling for blood. What he was doing was not justice, it actively hindered… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.529 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.65 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.95 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticizes predator-catching practices and their exploitation, without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Criticises the host and predator-catching shows as spectacle, but never judges the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Criticizes Chris Hansen and the To Catch a Predator phenomenon, not the film itself; no judgement of the movie. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment critiques the real-life subject matter (Chris Hansen/To Catch a Predator) without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Critiques predator-catching spectacle, not the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Criticizes the predator-catching practices discussed, but gives no judgment of the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER 0.529 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter strongly criticizes the film's subject and its societal impact as exploitative entertainment. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #52 w 0.137 A film about exploitation that wasn't afraid to show the hypocrisy inherent in doing something like that for television. The predators wanted to exploit kids. The production wanted to exploit the predators. The National Inquirer wanted to exploit Chris Hansen. Chris Hansen… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.863 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.66 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls it fascinating and a great feel-bad experience, praising the performances and exploration of exploitation. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the film's handling of hypocrisy and the performances, and calls it fascinating and 'a great feel bad time.' Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it fascinating, praises performances, and 'a great feel bad time at the movies'; the sickening feeling is praise of its themes. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the performances, themes, and calls it a "great feel bad time at the movies." Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it fascinating and a great feel-bad movie; praises the cast and approach. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it fascinating, praises the performances, and describes it as a great movie experience despite its disturbing subject. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls it fascinating, praises the performances, and ends with 'A great feel bad time at the movies.' Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film's themes, performances, and overall impact, calling it a great film despite making them feel sick. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #53 w 0.136 There's this feeling of uneasiness the film captures so well that you can't help but feel sick and suffocating as we're watching this macabre exploitation of people, really hits home about the pursuit of sensationalism. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.696 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film’s effective uneasiness and powerful critique of sensationalism; disturbing feelings are presented as artistic success. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises how well the film captures unease and its effective commentary on sensationalism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the film for capturing uneasiness so well and hitting home on sensationalism; the sickening feeling is credited as the film's success. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the film for effectively capturing a disturbing feeling of uneasiness and delivering a poignant message on sensationalism. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises how well the film captures uneasiness and hits home. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises how effectively the film captures unease and critiques sensationalism. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the film for capturing uneasiness and hitting home about sensationalism; the unsettling content is framed as well done. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film for successfully capturing uneasiness and making a strong point about sensationalism. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #54 w 0.135 “Are we talking a senator, a president?” got a nice chuckle out of my audience. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.67 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.08 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Reports the audience laughing at a line without expressing an overall opinion of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Quotes a line and notes audience laughter; no judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Mentions a line getting a laugh from the audience, but gives no overall judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Quotes a line and notes the audience's reaction without giving an overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Quotes a line and notes a laugh, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes an audience reaction to a line, without judging the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Quotes a line from the film and mentions an audience reaction; no clear judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only mentions audience reaction to a specific quote without giving a verdict on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #55 w 0.134 I know it’s referencing Trump but it was not lost on me that W would’ve been president at that time and he was from Texas VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.349 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.09 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.62 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses political references and historical context without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comment discusses political references and historical context without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter makes an observation about political references and the setting's timeline, without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes an observation about historical context and political references without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Political/historical observation about the film's reference, no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Notes a political reference and historical context without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment offers a historical observation about the film's reference, with no judgement of the film's quality or whether they recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing a political reference and historical context without expressing an opinion on the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #56 w 0.132 It was great to see the shock once everyone realized it was a DA. I thought it was a good touch showing how the DA interacted constantly with the police to show how messed up this was. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.459 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.79 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.63 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the reveal and the film’s effective depiction of the DA’s relationship with police. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the reveal and calls the DA-police interaction a good touch, approving of the film's choices. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says it was great and a good touch, praising the film's choices without any criticism. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises specific story choices and scenes as 'great' and a 'good touch'. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the reveal and the DA-police interaction as a good touch. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the reveal great and the DA’s interaction with police a good touch. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the reveal and the film's handling of the DA-police dynamic, calling it a good touch. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises specific elements of the film, calling it a 'good touch' and expressing enjoyment. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #57 w 0.131 We're gonna see that moment of Chris doing a slow arching point to Dan's crotch and whispering "cock" do some heavy circulation on the web. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.153 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.25 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Predicts a scene becoming an internet meme without expressing a judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Predicts a scene will become a meme; no evaluation of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Jokey prediction about a scene going viral; no explicit judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment describes a specific humorous moment and predicts it will become a meme without judging the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about a meme-worthy scene; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Predicts a scene becoming popular online without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment predicts a viral moment in the film but gives no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a specific scene and predicts internet virality without judging the film itself. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #58 w 0.13 Saw an interview with Gisondo, he said that was the very first scene he filmed on the movie and RPat did that completely improvised. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.09 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.92 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Shares interview trivia about filming and improvisation without judging the movie. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Shares behind-the-scenes trivia about improvisation without judging the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Shares behind-the-scenes trivia about a scene being improvised; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only shares behind-the-scenes trivia from an interview without expressing any opinion on the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Behind-the-scenes trivia only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Shares behind-the-scenes trivia about an interview and an improvised scene, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Shares trivia about how a scene was filmed; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses behind-the-scenes trivia without judging the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #59 w 0.129 Pattinson deliberately avoided telling the director and some of the cast what he would do or say, as they shot it like a documentary with no shot lists or rehearsals. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.273 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.21 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.61 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes Pattinson’s filming approach without judging the film’s quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Production trivia about Pattinson's improvisation; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Shares production trivia about Pattinson's approach and the shooting style, without giving any judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only shares behind-the-scenes production trivia without expressing any opinion on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Behind-the-scenes trivia with no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Behind-the-scenes information about the filming process, with no judgment of the movie. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Shares production trivia about how the film was shot; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment shares behind-the-scenes trivia about the filming process without expressing any opinion on the movie. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #60 w 0.128 So the mirror scene where he does that goofy ass voice mocking his producer was definitely improvised then lol VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.178 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.11 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.87 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Speculates that a scene was improvised without judging the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Speculation about a scene being improvised; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment speculates about whether a scene was improvised and jokes about it, without giving an overall judgement of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely speculates about a scene being improvised without expressing an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Scene trivia about improvisation; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates that a scene was improvised; gives no opinion on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about whether a scene was improvised; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a scene improvisation without expressing a judgment or recommendation on the film itself. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #61 w 0.127 The dramatic mouthwash spit was a very unexpected laugh VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.597 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.13 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Enjoyed the mouthwash scene's unexpected humor. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Mentions one scene was unexpectedly funny; no overall judgement of whether they liked the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Mentions one scene being an unexpected laugh, but gives no overall judgment or recommendation of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter notes a funny moment in a specific scene without offering an overall judgment on the film itself. Grok 4.7: positive — They laughed at a scene, a brief positive reaction. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They enjoyed the unexpected laugh from the scene, indicating a positive reaction to the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment notes a funny scene but gives no overall judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Just mentions a funny specific scene without expressing an overall opinion on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #62 w 0.126 people always laugh at how he says out of pocket things in interviews. he does, and that personality is partly what makes him a great actor. he makes such distinct great choices VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.915 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.18 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Praises an actor’s personality and acting choices generally, without judging this film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Praises the actor's personality and choices in general, without judging this specific film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Praises an actor's personality and acting choices in general, not a judgement of Primetime itself; no clear verdict on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment praises an actor's general personality and acting choices, without judging the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Praises the actor's personality and choices, not the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Praises the actor’s interview personality and acting choices without judging this film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Praises the actor's choices and personality, but does not give a judgement of this film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the actor's distinct and great choices, indicating approval of his work. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + |
| thread #63 w 0.125 I'm still wondering why he's blinking so much after saying beggars in the Odyssey VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.35 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Asks about a character's blinking without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comment asks about a character's blinking in a scene; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment only raises a curiosity about a character's blinking in a scene; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes an observation about a specific moment/other project without giving a verdict on Primetime. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Scene observation only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Asks about a character's behavior in a scene without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment asks about a specific detail (character blinking) with no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses a specific plot detail and asks a question without judging the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #64 w 0.124 The Jared Fogle jumpscare got me. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.30 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes a reaction to a jumpscare without judging the film’s quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — A joking reaction to one moment, with no judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Brief remark about a surprising Jared Fogle appearance; it's a joke or reaction with no clear judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke/observation about a specific moment without expressing an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about one jumpscare moment, no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a reaction to a jumpscare without judging the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says a jumpscare 'got me', implying the scare worked on them; an approving reaction to the film's horror, with no criticism. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke about a specific scene without expressing an overall judgment of the film. | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 |
| thread #65 w 0.123 It's great as both dark humor to anchor the film in the aughts, as well as showcase the evil in plain sight that is overlooked or permitted away by society, im favor for the evil that is othered, which ultimately TCAP did. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.026 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.71 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film’s dark humor and its thematic portrayal of overlooked societal evil. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls an element 'great' for its dark humor and social commentary; praise of the film's approach. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter calls an element of the film 'great' for its dark humor and social commentary, indicating approval of the film's approach. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the film's effective use of dark humor and thematic commentary. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the film’s dark humor and social critique great. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the film’s dark humor and its portrayal of societal complicity. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the film 'great' and praises its dark humor and social commentary, a clear endorsement of the movie. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states 'It's great' and praises its dark humor and thematic execution. | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #66 w 0.122 pattinson is on a generational run and disappears into yet another role. skyler gisondo was also fantastic. really gorgeous and creative shots throughout, and the whole vibe of the movie was very dirty and almost hypnotic. loved it. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.872 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.87 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.56 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly loved the film, praising the performances, creative cinematography, and hypnotic atmosphere. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the performances, the cinematography and the hypnotic vibe, and explicitly says 'loved it.' Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the acting, cinematography, and hypnotic atmosphere, and ends with an explicit 'loved it'. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they 'loved it' and praises the acting, cinematography, and hypnotic vibe. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises performances, shots, and vibe; explicitly loved it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the performances, visuals, and atmosphere, and explicitly says they loved the movie. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the cast, the visuals, and the vibe, and ends with 'loved it.' Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the acting, cinematography, and overall vibe, concluding with 'loved it'. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #67 w 0.121 Haven't seen this movie yet but 2 things. A) Ever since I saw The Lighthouse, ive decided ill watch ANYTHING with Robert Pattinson in it. He is absolutely one of the best actors in Hollywood today. B) all the comments about Skyler Gisondo have me super excited. The first thing… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.952 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.15 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.44 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Hasn't seen the movie; expresses enthusiasm for its actors rather than judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film; only praises actors and expresses excitement. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film; they only praise actors generally and express excitement, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter explicitly states they haven't seen the movie yet. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Has not seen the film; only excited about the actors. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They haven't seen the movie; praise and excitement concern the actors, not the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER 0.952 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter explicitly states they haven't seen the movie yet. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #68 w 0.12 "Is Pepsi okay?" had me cackling. Just a generational line read by Pattinson. Also, the cop reading his letter talking about the important work Predator does while ordering the Jared Special from Subway was diabolical. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.66 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.69 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.41 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises Pattinson’s line delivery and the film’s dark humor, describing how much the jokes amused them. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic praise for a 'generational line read' and darkly funny scenes; clearly enjoyed the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter enthusiastically praises specific moments as hilarious and diabolical, implying they enjoyed the film, though no explicit overall recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises specific comedic moments and Robert Pattinson's line delivery, showing clear enjoyment of the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Laughs at and praises memorable line reads and scenes. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the film’s humor and Pattinson’s line delivery, saying the moment had them cackling. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter laughed at specific lines and calls the scene 'diabolical' as praise, signaling enjoyment of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises specific comedic and impactful moments with enthusiasm ('had me cackling', 'generational line'). | + | − | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #69 w 0.12 Are you seeing the polar bears? It’s over VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.52 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.37 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A quote or contextual remark without any judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Cryptic quote or joke reference with no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Cryptic joke or quote with no judgment of the film itself; no clear recommendation or criticism. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a quote or joke without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Cryptic remark with no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A brief quote or joke with no clear opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment asks a question about a plot element and says 'It's over' without clearly judging the film's quality or recommending it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is an irrelevant quote or joke, not expressing an opinion on the film. | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #70 w 0.119 LOST hype will never be recreated. People were foaming at the mouths for the polar bears. I miss those days. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.562 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.86 P(pos)=0.34 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.70 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Expresses nostalgia for LOST hype without judging Primetime. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Nostalgic comment about LOST hype; no judgement of the film Primetime itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment reminisces about LOST fan hype and polar bears; offers no judgement of the film Primetime. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is reminiscing about the TV show LOST and makes no mention or judgment of the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Nostalgia about LOST hype; no judgment of this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Reflects nostalgically on LOST-era hype without judging this film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment references Lost hype and nostalgia, with no judgement of the film Primetime itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses LOST hype and memories, not a judgment on the film Primetime. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #71 w 0.118 just wanted to say, it is absolutely gorgeous looking, the color, lighting, cinematography, all throughout the movie blew me away. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.624 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.62 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Enthusiastically praises the film’s visuals, color, lighting, and cinematography. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic praise of the film's color, lighting and cinematography; no criticism expressed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Strongly praises the film's visuals (color, lighting, cinematography) as gorgeous and awe-inspiring throughout, indicating a favorable view of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter strongly praises the film's visuals, color, lighting, and cinematography, saying it blew them away. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the film's color, lighting, and cinematography throughout. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They enthusiastically praise the film’s color, lighting, and cinematography. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says the cinematography, color and lighting 'blew me away,' expressing clear admiration for the film's visuals. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the visual elements of the film, stating the cinematography blew them away. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #72 w 0.117 Same, I think that this is my favorite movie cinematography-wise in a long time. That shot where he's confronting the rabbi, and it slowly puts his face more in shadow until his eyes are going black gave me goosebumps. A lot of absolutely beautiful and haunting shots in this… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.843 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.97 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls the cinematography a recent favorite and praises the film’s beautiful, haunting shots. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it their favorite movie cinematography-wise in a long time, praising beautiful, haunting shots. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it a favorite film in a long time for its cinematography, praising beautiful, haunting shots that gave goosebumps. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter strongly praises the film's cinematography, describing the shots as beautiful, haunting, and giving them goosebumps. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises cinematography as a favorite, calling shots beautiful and haunting. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the film’s cinematography and haunting visuals, describing the shots as beautiful and evocative. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.843 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the cinematography and calls the shots beautiful and haunting. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #73 w 0.116 Some strong parts especially the ending half which I found to be best part of the movie. But did anyone else find the movie not to be cohesive? Like I felt a lot was going on. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.791 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.96 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): mixed — Praises strong parts and the latter half, but criticizes the film’s cohesion without a clear overall lean. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Praises the strong ending half but criticizes the film's lack of cohesion; no clear overall lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Praises the strong ending half but criticizes the film as incohesive and unfocused, with no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Praises the strong second half while criticizing the overall lack of cohesion, without a clear overall lean. Grok 4.7: mixed — Praises strong ending but criticizes lack of cohesion, no overall lean. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They praise the ending half but criticize the film as incohesive and overloaded. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — Praises the ending as the best part but criticises the movie as not cohesive and too busy. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Prised the ending but criticized the film for not being cohesive with too much going on. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #74 w 0.115 Yeah I feel like there wasn’t much of a rhythm. Still enjoyed it tho VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.791 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.65 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.71 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Criticizes the rhythm but explicitly says they still enjoyed the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Notes a pacing flaw but leans positive overall with 'still enjoyed it'. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Criticizes the lack of rhythm but concludes 'still enjoyed it,' leaning positive overall despite the flaw. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they still enjoyed the film despite a minor pacing criticism. Grok 4.7: positive — Notes weak rhythm but still enjoyed the film overall. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They note a lack of rhythm but say they still enjoyed the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.791 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter notes a flaw in rhythm but explicitly states they still enjoyed the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #75 w 0.115 Ending especially. It just ended so abruptly. I was shocked there wasn’t a little more wrap up. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.318 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.84 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the abrupt ending and lack of sufficient wrap-up. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes the abrupt ending and lack of wrap-up; no praise offered. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the ending as abrupt and lacking wrap-up, expressing disappointment with the film's conclusion without any offsetting praise. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the film's abrupt ending and lack of proper conclusion. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the abrupt ending and lack of wrap-up. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the abrupt ending and lack of resolution, expressing dissatisfaction with the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Criticizes the abrupt ending and wished for more wrap-up, implying dissatisfaction with the film's conclusion. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the abrupt ending and lack of wrap-up. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #76 w 0.114 I’m not totally surprised. It was definitely a surreal film. The ending made me wonder “was it all worth it?” at the end, and that’s a bit what this film was about. Was all of that trauma worth the SAG card? We’ll never really know. Same goes with exploiting everyone in this… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.349 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.95 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.61 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses the film’s surreal nature, ending, and exploitation themes without expressing approval or disappointment. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses the film's themes and ending without clearly praising or criticising the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter discusses the film's themes and ending without clearly stating whether they liked it or would recommend it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter discusses the film's themes and ending without stating whether they liked or disliked the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Thematic discussion of the ending; no clear like or dislike. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They interpret the film’s themes and ending but don’t clearly say whether they liked or disliked the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER -0.349 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Acknowledges surreal qualities and thematic depth, but questions the exploitative nature and worth of the events. | − | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #77 w 0.113 Don’t get me wrong, Robert Pattinson is amazing and delivers on the hype and then some but Skyler Gisondo might have stole the movie. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.09 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.90 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Enthusiastically praises Pattinson’s performance and suggests Gisondo is even more impressive. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises Pattinson as amazing and says Gisondo stole the movie; both acting comments are praise. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises Pattinson as amazing and says Gisondo might have stolen the movie, implying strong approval of the film's performances. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Enthusiastically praises the performances of both lead actors, stating they delivered on the hype and stole the movie. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the lead performances as amazing and scene-stealing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises the performances as amazing and says one actor may have stolen the movie. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises Pattinson as amazing, delivering on hype, and says Gisondo may have stolen the movie; overall enthusiastic about the film's performances. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the acting performances strongly, indicating high enjoyment of the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #78 w 0.113 I like how Chris Hansen is almost an ominous, controlling force at times rather than a character, all of the subtle manipulation he does and then seeing how it impacts everyone is so interesting. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.396 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.64 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.77 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the character's ominous presence and subtle manipulation as interesting aspects of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises Chris Hansen's portrayal as an ominous, manipulative force and calls its impact fascinating. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter expresses liking for the portrayal of Chris Hansen and finds the manipulation and its effects on others interesting, which is praise of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they liked the portrayal of Chris Hansen and found the impact interesting. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the film's ominous portrayal of Hansen as interesting and impactful. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the film’s portrayal of Chris Hansen and find its effects on others interesting. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the film's portrayal of Hansen as ominous and finds the manipulation and its impact 'so interesting'. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises how Chris Hansen is portrayed and finds the impact of his manipulation 'so interesting'. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #79 w 0.112 Skylar was the heart and soul of this movie. Everyone involved in the show keeps justifying the morally grey areas of it all by saying they're catching bad people who want to exploit children, all while they're exploiting this young aspiring actor who's having to continually… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.748 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.59 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises Skylar as the movie’s heart and soul and celebrates his performance’s powerful emotional impact. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises Skylar's performance as the heart of the movie, so moving it hurt; critiques the show's ethics, not the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises Skylar's performance as the film's heart and soul, saying he played the role incredibly well and moved them emotionally. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Strongly praises the lead actor's performance and expresses deep emotional engagement with the character and story. Grok 4.7: mixed — Praises the lead performance deeply, but criticizes the production’s exploitation of the young actor. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises Skylar’s performance and emotional impact, calling him the movie’s heart and soul. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the lead's performance as 'incredibly well' done and says it moved them; no criticism of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — High praise for the acting and emotional impact of the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | + |
| thread #80 w 0.111 I love how this film captures the profound evil of the 2000s with the Iraq War in the background but only through the lens of its coverage. The film does a really stellar job at how To Catch a Predator essentially made pedophiles such a public spectactle to hide away America's… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.842 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.92 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly loves the film’s thematic approach and praises its execution as stellar. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the film's thematic depth as stellar; describing dark subject matter isn't criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter praises the film's capture of 2000s themes, its commentary on media spectacle, and Pattinson's performance, saying it 'really clicked' for them. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises how the film captures its themes, saying they 'love' it and it does a 'stellar job'. Grok 4.7: positive — Loves how the film captures its themes and calls the execution stellar. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter loves the film’s cultural framing and says it does a stellar job portraying the show’s spectacle. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER -0.842 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the film, stating it 'captures the profound evil' and does a 'stellar job'. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #81 w 0.11 I cackled when the perverted justice guy shrieked as Chris reentered the room VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER -0.026 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.65 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.57 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes laughing at a specific character moment without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter laughed hard at a scene, showing they enjoyed that moment of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a funny moment in the film they enjoyed, but offers no overall verdict or recommendation of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter reacts to a funny moment in a specific scene without giving an overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Amused reaction to one scene, no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They describe laughing at a scene, showing they enjoyed that moment in the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter laughs ('cackled') at a scene, implying enjoyment of the film's comedic moment. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Laughing at a satisfying moment in the film indicates enjoyment. | 0 | − | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | + |
| thread #82 w 0.11 I thought this was a really interesting movie. It's kind of difficult to really explain to anyone who wasn't around then how crazy impactful To Catch a Predator was. As this movie shows, it just tapped into something so raw in people. The anger and justice and shame and… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.999 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.69 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.71 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film’s moral complexity, thematic exploration, and performances, calling it interesting and fantastically executed. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it really interesting, loved the grey morality, fantastic exploration, praises performances and Pattinson. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter calls it really interesting, says they loved the grey morality, and praises its exploration of themes and the performances. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the grey morality, thematic exploration, and standout performances. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it interesting and fantastic, loves its morality and performances. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it interesting, loves its moral ambiguity, and says it does a fantastic job exploring its themes. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter repeatedly praises the film's grey morality, craft, and performances, saying they loved it and it does a fantastic job. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls the movie 'really interesting', praises its exploration of morality, and highlights the strong performances. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #83 w 0.109 I loved the grey morality this movie offers, it's not so much about taking Hansen down, it's more about the idea that once you start broadcasting your just acts or your righteous shaming that any purity is immediately tainted The central theme of this movie seems to be the idea… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.929 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.61 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly loved the film’s moral ambiguity and praised its exploration of justice versus vanity. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter loved the film's grey morality and its exploration of justice versus vanity. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they loved the movie's grey morality and themes, and the film made them excited for related work. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the grey morality and themes offered by the movie. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the film's grey morality and central themes. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly say they loved the film’s moral complexity and praise its central themes. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.929 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states they 'loved' the movie's moral complexity and themes. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #84 w 0.108 “‘I like to suck n fuck.’ Is that New Testament or Old Testament?” VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.103 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.84 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.37 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Quotes dialogue and jokes about it without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Quoting a line from the film as a joke; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — The comment quotes a line of dialogue as a joke, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is simply a quote or joke without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke quoting a line; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke or quoted line with no opinion about the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about a quote with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is just a quote from the movie without any judgment or review. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #85 w 0.108 The kind of second to last scene where they split everything into the recording cameras was really really cool. Thought that could’ve been a cool way to end it, as a final scene. But happy, too, we got a happy ending for the probably most sympathetic “good guy” character in the… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.962 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.16 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.56 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the camera-split scene as really cool and appreciates the sympathetic character’s happy ending. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the split-camera scene as really cool and is happy with the ending; overall favorable. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the second-to-last scene as 'really really cool' and is happy with the ending; the only quibble is a minor alternate-ending thought. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises specific scenes as 'really really cool' and expresses satisfaction with the character's happy ending. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises a cool scene and is happy with the ending. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the scene as really cool and express happiness with the ending. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the scene 'really really cool' and says they're happy with the ending, a clear approval of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises a specific scene as really cool and expresses happiness about the satisfying ending. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #86 w 0.107 I didn’t find that ending to be happy. Before we even saw if he got his SAG AFTRA, I was thinking that it’s a loss either way after all he’s been through. They kind of hint that he’s reclusive after the show. He couldn’t even answer when that guy asked “are you an actor”. It… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.312 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.93 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Interprets the ending as unhappy and cruel for the character without judging the film’s quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Interprets the ending's bleakness and the character's fate without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Interprets the ending's meaning and tone without judging the film's quality or recommending it; it is analysis, not a verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses and interprets the plot and ending without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Interprets the ending as unhappy and ironic, without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They describe the ending as unhappy and getting his card as a cruel joke, expressing a negative view of the film’s conclusion. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses the ending's plot and character outcome without clearly judging whether they liked or would recommend the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter expresses disappointment with the bleak ending, describing it as a "cruel joke." | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | − |
| thread #87 w 0.107 The actual actor did an interview for the documentary Predators, highly recommend a watch btw, and he didn’t seem all that proud of his role, especially when it came to the Conradt situation. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.709 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.60 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.35 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Recommends the documentary Predators and discusses an actor’s feelings, without judging Primetime itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Recommends a different documentary and discusses the actual person; no judgement of this film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment is trivia about an actor's interview in another documentary; the recommendation is for Predators, not for Primetime itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Recommends a different documentary ('Predators') and shares trivia without giving a verdict on 'Primetime'. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses an actor interview and another documentary, not this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Recommends the documentary and comments on the actor’s feelings about his role, but gives no verdict on Primetime. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses an actor's interview and a documentary about the real case, not a judgement of the film Primetime itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment recommends a different documentary and discusses an actor's interview, not the film Primetime. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #88 w 0.106 straight up, the scene after the whipped cream guy whips it out, when skyler sits down and it's only noticable he's crying halfway through the conversation with the producer, that was so interesting. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.316 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.15 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the scene's subtle acting and presentation as interesting. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises a specific scene as 'so interesting', showing appreciation of the film's craft. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter singles out a scene as 'so interesting' and praises its subtle execution, implying appreciation of the film, though no overall verdict is given. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises a specific scene and subtle acting choice as 'so interesting'. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises a specific scene as interesting, showing approval of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They describe a scene in the film as very interesting, indicating appreciation. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter calls a specific scene 'so interesting' and praises its subtle execution, signaling approval of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses a specific scene and finds it interesting without stating a clear positive or negative verdict on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #89 w 0.105 That scene where Dan is watching his promo on TV with his friends and everyone is laughing while he has to re-experience something as traumatic as that made me feel a uniquely gut-wrenching feeling. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.477 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.20 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.33 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes a scene’s gut-wrenching emotional impact without explicitly praising or criticizing the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Describes a scene's powerful, gut-wrenching emotional impact, implicitly praising its effectiveness. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Describes a scene's powerful emotional impact (gut-wrenching) as an affecting experience, implying admiration, though no explicit recommendation or criticism is given. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises a scene's strong emotional impact by noting it evoked a 'uniquely gut-wrenching feeling'. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Describes a gut-wrenching scene reaction without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a scene's emotional impact without expressing an opinion on the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Describes the scene as 'gut-wrenching' and emotionally powerful, praising its impact without criticizing the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising the film's ability to evoke a powerful, gut-wrenching emotional response. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | + |
| thread #90 w 0.105 This movie was a hate letter to the 2000s and I loved it. I thought the main anchor parts were a little hammy though VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.052 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.93 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly loved the movie despite finding the main anchor parts a little hammy. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says they loved it; the minor criticism of hammy anchor parts doesn't outweigh the clear praise. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Explicitly says they loved it; the minor critique of hammy anchor parts doesn't change the overall positive lean. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the movie despite a minor criticism of the acting. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the film overall despite finding some parts hammy. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They loved the movie despite finding the main anchor parts a little hammy. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they loved the film; the only criticism, hammy anchor parts, is minor and does not offset the praise. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Explicitly stated 'I loved it' despite minor criticism of some parts. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #91 w 0.104 Merritt weaving did amazing. Puka? No puka? Line delivery of the century VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.452 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.52 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Enthusiastically praises the acting and a specific line delivery. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises Merritt Wever's performance as amazing and calls a line delivery 'of the century'. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises Merritt Weaving's performance as amazing and calls a line delivery the best of the century, showing clear appreciation of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter strongly praises Merritt Wever's acting performance and line delivery in the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the actor's performance and a standout line delivery. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Enthusiastic praise for Merritt Weaving’s performance and line delivery signals approval of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises Merritt's performance as 'amazing' and calls a line delivery 'of the century', a clear endorsement. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the lead actor's performance and iconic line delivery. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #92 w 0.104 Certainly did not paint Hansen in a good light, but not the villain the trailers and hype seemingly made him out to be. Was he fame hungry? Yes. Did the movie make it clear he felt he was fighting some kind of evil? Also yes. Was he scummy? No doubt. A person can be scummy… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.953 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.66 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses Hansen’s characterization and intentions without expressing approval or criticism of the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses Hansen's portrayal and character nuance without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses character portrayal and nuance of Hansen, plus marketing comparison, without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses how the main character/subject is portrayed in the film without expressing whether they liked the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character analysis of Hansen; no judgement of the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses Hansen’s portrayal and motivations without judging whether the film itself was good or worth recommending. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses the character Hansen and his motives; no clear judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses character actions and portrayal without expressing a clear verdict on the film itself. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #93 w 0.103 DA Pedo: talks about musicals Chris, whispering: cock 👉👇 Dan: So yeah anyway, my cock gets super hard like really easy. Maybe you come over and try. 😭😭 VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.566 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.13 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.49 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Jokes about dialogue and characters without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joking recap of a scene with no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke or quoted exchange with crude humor; it offers no judgment of the film's quality or any recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a joke or meme referencing a scene without expressing an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke or quoted dialogue with no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a quoted or joking exchange with no opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Quotes a joke exchange from the film with no judgement of whether the film itself is good or worth watching. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment quotes dialogue or makes a joke about the plot without expressing a verdict on the film. | + | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #94 w 0.103 Oppenheim has the juice, this makes me even more excited for You Can See Everything. Coming from documentaries, I did not expect his first feature to be so stylized and maximalist. Constant bright neon lighting, extreme close ups, creative mixing of mediums, and letting R Patty… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.788 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.84 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Enthusiastically praises the film’s maximalist style and performances, calling it great and rating it 9/10. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the director, style and performance, and rates the film 9/10. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter praises the director's stylized approach, the lead performance, and gives the film 9/10 with 'Great shit'. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the stylized direction, acting choices, and explicitly gives the film a 9/10 rating. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises stylized debut and rates it 9/10. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it great, praises its stylized choices, and rates it 9/10. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the stylized, maximalist filmmaking and gives it 9/10, excited for director's next film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls it 'Great shit' and gives it a 9/10. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #95 w 0.102 That monster was legit scary VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.128 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.90 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.56 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calling the monster genuinely scary praises the film’s effectiveness. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calling the monster legitimately scary is praise of the film's effective horror. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the monster as legitimately scary; scary content praise counts as a positive verdict on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praising the monster as genuinely scary indicates a positive reaction to the film's horror elements. Grok 4.7: positive — Calling the monster legitimately scary praises the film's horror. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises the monster as genuinely scary, indicating appreciation of the film's horror. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the monster 'legit scary', praising the film's frightening content as effective; no criticism given. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising the monster as scary indicates approval of the film's horror elements. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #96 w 0.102 I really wanted to like this more than I did. I thought the film was all over the place. And I actually preferred the story of Skylar as Dan the most interesting. It felt like a knock off nightcrawler but we don’t spend enough time with Chris for it to work. And it didn’t lean… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.963 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.96 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Despite liking it and giving a positive review, their overall assessment emphasizes disappointment, disjointed storytelling, and frustration. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Many criticisms (unfocused, three movies in one) yet says they liked it and gave a positive review. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Mostly critical (disjointed, derivative, frustrated) but says they still liked it and gave a positive review; no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Explicitly states they liked it and gave a positive review, yet spends the whole comment expressing frustration and structural criticism. Grok 4.7: mixed — Liked it and reviewed it positively, but frustration and structural flaws outweigh enjoyment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Despite liking it enough for a positive review, they emphasize frustration and say the film’s stories and execution didn’t work for them. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.963 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Wanted to like it more, felt frustrated, but ultimately gave it a positive review. | + | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | + | 0 |
| thread #97 w 0.101 I love color theory in film, and this movie is art. For a film called Primetime, it's fitting that the director builds the palette around primary colors: blue for Hansen's obsession, red for the naivety of Dan, and yellow for the children. In fact, there's a scene where Andie… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.966 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.50 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls the movie art and enthusiastically praises its color symbolism and thematic depth. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls the movie art and praises its deliberate color symbolism and Gatsby-inspired visual storytelling. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says 'this movie is art' and offers an admiring, detailed analysis of its color theory and symbolism. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states 'this movie is art' and thoroughly praises its use of color theory and symbolism. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the movie art and praises its deliberate color symbolism. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They call the film art and enthusiastically praise its color theory and visual symbolism. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.966 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls the movie 'art' and thoroughly praises its use of color theory and literary parallels. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #98 w 0.101 An honest to goodness "enhance" scene in 2026. What a time to be alive VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.836 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.86 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.50 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Sarcastically mocks the film for using a dated, implausible "enhance" scene. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Sarcastically mocks the film's use of a dated, clichéd 'enhance' scene, implying criticism of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment notes a cliché 'enhance' scene with ambiguous tone; could be amused or mocking, but gives no clear verdict on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Joke/observation about a trope in a specific scene without an overall judgement of the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about an enhance scene, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Mocks the film for using an outdated, implausible “enhance” scene. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Sarcastic jab at a cliched 'enhance' scene; mocking tone signals the commenter is dismissive of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only makes a joke about a specific scene trope without judging the film. | + | + | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − | 0 |