Other Mommy
← all movies. Each comment's label under every pathway (+ positive, − negative, 0 neutral / mixed / no verdict; hover a cell for the verdict).
Pick a pathway to show its verdict and rationale under every comment: VADER (old v1) · siebert+opinion (previous live) · Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) · GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE) · Claude Opus 5.5 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Gemini 4 Argon · Grok 4.7 · GPT-6 Luna (cheap) · Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) · Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap)
| comment (excerpt ≤280 chars) | VADER (old v1) | siebert+opinion (previous live) | Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) | GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE) | Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.7 | GPT-6 Luna (cheap) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank · score · bucket · Reddit · comments +/0/− | #15 42 Skip R 51 49/12/38 | #13 35 Skip R 36 25/29/45 | #13 31 Skip R 25 13/55/31 | #12 44 Skip R 56 19/62/18 | #12 47 Skip R 61 19/64/16 | #12 48 Skip R 64 21/63/15 | #12 47 Skip R 61 19/64/16 | #12 42 Skip R 51 19/62/18 | #12 46 Skip R 60 25/53/21 | #12 47 Skip R 62 25/59/15 | #12 43 Skip R 52 20/58/21 |
| thread #0 w 1.0 Kid: I left my stuffed doll back at the spooky house! Parents: Fuck that doll Finally got a smart scene with that bullshit cliche of getting people back in the house for stupid reasons VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.852 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.86 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film for smartly avoiding a clichéd reason to return to the spooky house. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the film for a smart scene that subverts the cliche of characters returning to the house for stupid reasons. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter praises the scene as smart for subverting the cliché of returning to the house, implying approval of the film's writing. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises a scene in the movie for being smart and subverting an annoying horror cliche. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Praises one smart scene versus a cliche, no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the film for smartly subverting a contrived horror cliché. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER -0.852 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises a smart scene that avoids a common horror cliché. | − | − | − | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | + |
| thread #1 w 0.707 So the opposite of that Black Mirror episode where several people get themselves brutally killed to get a child a teddy bear. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.612 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.45 P(pos)=0.98 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Makes a plot comparison to Black Mirror without judging the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comparison to a Black Mirror episode; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment draws a comparison to a Black Mirror episode without expressing any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a plot comparison to a TV show without offering any judgment on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke comparing the film to a Black Mirror episode, no judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Makes a comparison to a Black Mirror episode without expressing an opinion of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Compares the film to a Black Mirror episode by plot contrast; no judgement of this film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only makes a comparison to a Black Mirror episode without judging the film. | − | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #2 w 0.577 Also the opposite of Speak No Evil where a couple end up getting stoned to death after heading back retrieve a stuffed rabbit. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.099 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.66 P(pos)=0.97 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Compares plot events with another film without expressing an opinion on this film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot comparison to another film; no judgement of this movie's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment is a comparison to another film's plot (Speak No Evil) with no judgement of Other Mommy itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely compares a plot point to another movie without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot comparison to another film; no judgement of this movie. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Compares plot events with another film but gives no opinion of this film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comparison and plot description of another film's events; no judgement of Other Mommy itself is expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only describes the plot of the movie without expressing any personal opinion or judgment. | − | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #3 w 0.5 Honestly if people like this, they should read the book. It’s not a piece of literature that is going to last generations but everyone acts like they are supposed to act when a demon ghost zombie is trying to enter a child’s heart. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.871 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.79 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Recommends the book and discusses its characters' behavior without clearly judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Recommends and praises the book; no clear judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Recommends the book and comments on character behavior, but gives no clear judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter discusses and recommends the source book without giving a clear opinion on the film adaptation itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses the book and realistic acting without stating a personal film verdict. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They recommend the book to people who like the film and defend the characters’ reactions as appropriate. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.871 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the film's quality and implies it is not lasting literature. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | − | − |
| thread #4 w 0.447 Yeah I actually liked that the parents' actions in this were fairly reasonable and competent and didn't use those horror cliches that needlessly put them into trouble VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.557 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.90 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film for competent, reasonable parental actions and avoiding contrived horror clichés. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the parents' reasonable, competent behavior and the film's avoidance of horror clichés. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter explicitly liked that the parents acted reasonably and avoided horror cliches, which is praise of the film's writing. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the writing of the parents' actions and the avoidance of horror cliches. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises competent parents and avoidance of horror cliches. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly liked the film’s reasonable, competent portrayal of the parents. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter approves of the parents' reasonable, competent behavior and avoidance of horror clichés, signaling they liked the film's approach. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they liked the realistic and competent actions of the parents. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #5 w 0.408 Spoilers: the other mommy is NOT Bryce Dallas Howard VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.33 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.56 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A spoiler joke about identity, with no judgment of the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Shares a plot or casting detail as a spoiler without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment only states a plot/casting fact about the other mommy, with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a joke or plot/casting remark with no opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Spoiler joke about casting, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joking spoiler about a character’s identity, with no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Spoiler-style plot remark about casting with no judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only contains a plot spoiler without expressing any judgment or opinion on the film itself. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #6 w 0.378 Omg. This has me cracking up. I watched the movie earlier and was wondering during what kind of work she had done that she doesn't look like herself anymore. I didn't realize it was the "other" actor. 💀 VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.276 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.12 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.58 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Laughs about mistaking one actor for another without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about mistaking the actor's identity; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Joking about an actor's changed appearance and a mix-up; no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter shares a humorous anecdote about confusing the actors without stating an opinion on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Laughs about mistaking a different actor; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They’re amused by a mistaken assumption about the actor, not evaluating the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter jokes about the casting mix-up and a lead actor's appearance; no clear judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses a casting confusion and jokes about an actor's appearance without judging the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #7 w 0.354 Curves: Bryce Dallas Howard Less Curves: Jessica Chastain More Curves: Christina Hendricks VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.30 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.49 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Compares actresses' body types without expressing any judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — A joke comparing actresses' appearances; it gives no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about actresses' physiques; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke comparing actresses and does not express an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about actresses' figures, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke comparing actresses' curves, with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke ranking actresses by body type, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses physical attributes of actresses, not the film itself. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #8 w 0.333 And for that reason, I’m out. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.86 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.44 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — “I’m out” signals rejection of the film rather than interest or recommendation. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Ambiguous joke-like phrase with no context; no clear judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Ambiguous statement with no context; 'I'm out' doesn't clearly express a judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Uses a meme phrase likely indicating they won't watch it, offering no verdict on the actual film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Catchphrase joke with no stated judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A standalone catchphrase with no clear judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter says 'And for that reason, I'm out,' signaling they are abandoning or rejecting the film or its premise. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter expresses a refusal to engage or watch, indicating a negative verdict. | 0 | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − |
| thread #9 w 0.316 I made the same mistake. Wondered when Bryce lost the thiccness, respectfully VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.25 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.57 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.73 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Comments on Bryce’s appearance without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about an actor's appearance; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about an actor's appearance (apparent mistaken identity); no judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke about confusing an actress with Bryce Dallas Howard without judging the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about an actress's appearance, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a character's appearance, not the film's quality or whether it is recommended. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Joking remark about an actor's physical appearance; no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses actor appearance and makes a joke, not the quality of the film. | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #10 w 0.302 I am NOT Jessica Chastain https://youtu.be/ipObSiFHpyY?is=UNM5RtUTQB8JCpi5 VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.73 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.30 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — The comment shares a statement and link without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke referencing Jessica Chastain with a video link; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke or quip with a video link; it gives no opinion on whether the film is good or worth recommending. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is just a joke/reference with a YouTube link and expresses no opinion on the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke and link only; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke or reference without an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a joke/link referencing an actress, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment only contains a joke statement and a YouTube link, unrelated to evaluating the film. | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #11 w 0.289 Ridiculous plot… Bella to babysitter: hey, check out my creepy demonic friend lingering in the house. Babysitter: scared shitless. Probably should tell the parents. Bella (6 yo?) Don’t tell my mom & dad. Babysitter: Cool, back to the party! VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.525 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.79 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.81 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Calls the plot ridiculous and mocks the babysitter’s implausible behavior. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Calls the plot ridiculous and mocks the babysitter's illogical choices, criticising the film's writing. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Opens with 'Ridiculous plot' and mocks the babysitter's illogical behavior, criticizing the film's writing. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the movie's plot as 'ridiculous' and mocks the illogical behavior of the characters. Grok 4.7: negative — Mocks the plot as ridiculous and illogical. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Calls the plot ridiculous and mocks the characters’ implausible behavior, expressing criticism of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.525 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the plot as ridiculous by highlighting poor character decisions. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #12 w 0.277 I was also confused why they needed the babysitter to begin with since they didn't even leave the house. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.285 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.17 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.78 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Questions a plot detail about the babysitter without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot confusion question about the babysitter; no overall judgement of the film expressed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Questions a plot point (why a babysitter was needed) with confusion, but doesn't clearly judge the film overall or recommend/disrecommend it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only points out a minor plot confusion without expressing an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot confusion about the babysitter, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Questions the film's story logic, suggesting a plot point did not make sense. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a plot-logic question about the babysitter; no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing a plot point and asking a logical question about the story without expressing a judgment. | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #13 w 0.267 Because the parents were getting all kinds of fucked up downstairs and they needed a sober person to watch the kid VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.66 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.76 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.43 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Explains the characters' actions without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Explains a plot point about the parents needing a sober babysitter; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Answers a plot question with a joking explanation; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Pure plot discussion/explanation of character actions without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot explanation or joke, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A humorous explanation of the parents' behavior, with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot explanation about parents getting drunk and needing a sober babysitter; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a plot point and rationale for a character's actions without judging the film. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #14 w 0.258 Yeah honestly that was pretty responsible. I know they’re supposed to be framed as fairly shitty parents but they’re really not that bad. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.803 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.94 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Evaluates the parents’ behavior and characterization, not whether the film itself was good. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses characters' parenting within the plot; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment discusses the characters' parenting and how they're framed, without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses character actions and framing without expressing an overall opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character discussion of the parents, no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on how the parents are portrayed, without expressing an opinion about the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on parents' characterization and responsibility without clearly judging whether the film itself is good or worth recommending. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses characters' parenting rather than evaluating the quality of the film. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #15 w 0.25 Wow, just realized they learned from the time they they drank wine and the daughter got a scar from falling off a wire fence or something. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.494 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.72 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.66 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — The commenter notes a plot connection without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter notes a plot detail connection without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter points out a plot connection between scenes without expressing any judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely discusses a plot detail without expressing any opinion or verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot realization only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment recalls a plot detail but gives no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot detail about a scene and a scar; no judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing a plot detail and continuity without expressing an opinion on the film. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #16 w 0.243 I didn't think they were supposed to be taken as shitty parents tbh, I thought they were flawed but sincerely loving caretakers doing their genuine best VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.932 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.23 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.47 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Interprets the parents' characterization without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Interprets the parents' characterization; offers no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Interpretation of the parents' characterization; no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is pure character interpretation with no opinion expressed on the quality of the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character interpretation only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses how the parents should be interpreted, without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses how the characters should be interpreted as parents; no judgement of the film itself expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses characters' parental morality without judging the quality of the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #17 w 0.236 The book explained it better, but they were drinking and smoking and wanted someone to watch their kid while they did so. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.238 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.10 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.50 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Explains characters' motivations and references the book without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Explains a plot point and compares it to the book; no overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Plot explanation comparing to the book; offers no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Explains a plot point by referencing the book without expressing an overall opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot clarification and book comparison, no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They say the book explained the story better, implying the film was less effective. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot-focused comparison to the book and description of events; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses plot details and the book without providing a clear verdict on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #18 w 0.229 The parents generally kinda suck but in the books it's shown that they regularly like to get drunk and high right beside their kid, and they do it even after knowing about the monster situation! VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.237 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.85 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticizes the parents’ behavior and discusses the book, without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses the parents' behavior in the books; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on the parents' characterization and book details without giving any judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses the characters' behavior in the movie compared to the book without judging the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character and book comparison, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Criticizes the parents’ behavior in the books without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses parents' behavior in the books as plot detail; no judgement of this film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plot and book details without giving a verdict on the film itself. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #19 w 0.224 I kinda assumed the babysitter just chalked it up to seeing things. Would you tell someone that you saw a demon ghost for like 3 seconds or would you assume the kid put the imagery in your head and all you saw was your imagination. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.052 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.08 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.50 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses the babysitter’s interpretation of an event without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses the babysitter's plausible reaction to a plot point without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Speculates about plot and a character's reaction (the babysitter) without offering any judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses a character's motivations and plot logic without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot speculation about a character's reaction, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about a character's interpretation of an event without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about a plot point (the babysitter's reaction) without any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot logic and character reactions without expressing any opinion on the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #20 w 0.218 It's not really ridiculous, the babysitter only sees it for a couple moments before being called down by the parents. That's not really long enough to process if you're just seeing things or not. Plus, the parents are actively hosting a party and clearly weren't available to… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.79 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.53 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Defends a scene's plausibility without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Defends a scene's plausibility against criticism but gives no overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Defends a plot point's logic about the babysitter scene, but gives no overall verdict on whether they liked or recommend the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment defends the logic of a character's actions in a specific scene without expressing an overall verdict. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Defends a scene's logic; no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses the scene’s plausibility and character behavior without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Defends a plot logic point about the babysitter scene; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot logic and character actions without expressing a judgment on the film itself. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #21 w 0.213 And then Jessica Chastain turned herself into a toilet, funniest shit I’ve ever seen VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.57 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — An absurd joke about Jessica Chastain, not a clear assessment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Jokey description of an absurd scene; amusement is ambiguous between mockery and enjoyment, with no clear judgement. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls a scene 'funniest shit I've ever seen', expressing enjoyment of the film's content, though informal and possibly joking. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a meme/joke referencing Rick and Morty without offering a real verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Absurdist joke, not a real judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the film’s moment the funniest thing they’ve ever seen, expressing clear enjoyment. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the scene 'funniest shit I've ever seen', an enthusiastic endorsement of the film's content. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Meme quote used as a joke, no actual verdict on the film. | 0 | + | − | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 |
| thread #22 w 0.209 This happens in the book as well actually lol and somehow it’s very effective on paper VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.807 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.05 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.62 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Praises the scene's effectiveness in the book, without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on the book's handling of a scene; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on something happening in the book and its effectiveness on paper, without giving a clear verdict on the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses the book without expressing any opinion or verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Compares a moment to the book; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Compares an event's effectiveness in the book without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a plot event matching the book and says it works on paper; no clear judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses the book adaptation and effectiveness on paper without judging the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #23 w 0.204 It’s legitimately the best jump scare I’ve ever read. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.25 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.71 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Praises a jump scare in something they read, not the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Praises a jump scare they 'read', apparently the source text, not a judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls a jump scare the best they've ever read, which is praise for the work, though 'read' hints at the script or book. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment praises the source book ('read'), not the film adaptation. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls a jump scare the best they've experienced; clear praise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the jump scare the best they’ve ever experienced, expressing clear praise. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the jump scare the best they've ever read, praising the film's scary content. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film's jump scare as the best ever. | + | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | + | + |
| thread #24 w 0.2 This happens in the book sorta and it's probably the most terrifying scene as well VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.493 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.10 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses a terrifying scene in the book without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Compares a scene to the book and calls it terrifying, but gives no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on a scene's similarity to the book and its terror, without judging the film itself overall. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses a scene in the source book without expressing an opinion on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Compares a scene to the book; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the scene the most terrifying, praising its scary effect. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a scene being in the book and calls it terrifying, but gives no clear judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a scene from the book compared to the movie without judging the film. | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #25 w 0.196 I read the book but I dont remember that part? VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.03 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.68 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — The commenter discusses remembering the book, without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comment only asks about a book detail; no judgement of the film expressed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter only notes they don't remember a scene from the book; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses a detail in comparison to the book without expressing any opinion on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Book comparison only; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They mention reading the book and not remembering a part, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment only asks about a book detail; no judgement of the film is expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses the source material without giving a judgment on the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #26 w 0.192 It was so scary. Bela sits down to go to the bathroom in the dark and feels hair and realizes she’s sitting on Other Mommy’s lap VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.248 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.73 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calling the film so scary praises its horror effectiveness, illustrated by a frightening scene. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls the horror film 'so scary' and recounts a memorable frightening scene, which reads as appreciation. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter calls the film scary and recounts a frightening scene; in a horror context, this reads as appreciation rather than criticism. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Finds a specific scene in this horror story effectively scary, which is praise for the genre. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the film scary and highlights a frightening scene as effective horror. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calling the scene so scary conveys an approving reaction to the film’s horror. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a scene and calls it scary, but gives no overall judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising the film for being effectively scary. | + | − | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + |
| thread #27 w 0.189 Haven't seen this movie yet but in the book it's more like the toilet transforms into Other Mommy when Bela sits on it – I have no clue why they thought the other way around would be scary if that really happens lol VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.775 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.81 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Hasn't seen the film; speculates about an adaptation choice based on the book. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film; they compare it to the book and speculate about an adaptation choice. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film; they only compare a book detail to the adaptation, without judging the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter explicitly states they haven't seen the movie yet. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Hasn't seen the film; only book comparison speculation. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They haven't seen the movie and only compare its apparent scene with the book. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film; they compare it to the book's plot and joke about it, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter has not seen the movie and discusses the book instead. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #28 w 0.186 The Other Mommy is a mixed bag for me Jessica Chastain is great as The Other Mommy I appreciate the jump scare in the trailer was shown in the first 15 mins and it leads to the title drop but the movie wasn't scary after that The movie keeps spinning its wheels after the first… VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.014 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.96 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Despite praising performances and standout moments, they find later acts weak and conclude the story fails to make it work. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Praises Chastain and standout moments but calls the 2nd and 3rd acts weak and the story ineffective; explicitly 'mixed bag'. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Calls it a mixed bag, praising Chastain and standout scenes but criticizing weak second/third acts and a story that doesn't work overall. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Explicitly calls it a 'mixed bag', praising individual scenes and performances while criticizing the weak story and later acts. Grok 4.7: negative — Praises moments but concludes the story fails and later acts are weak. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Despite praising individual moments and performances, they say the later acts are weak and the story doesn’t work. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.014 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praises specific performances and scenes but criticizes the weak second/third acts and overall story. | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − | + | 0 |
| thread #29 w 0.183 The ghost hunter scene is where this movie really lost me. It started off depicting an ordinary middle class family who is being haunted by a supernatural force… Kinda an interesting start. And at some point they randomly arrive at the grandmother’s haunted mansion at the top… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.847 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.82 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — An initially interesting premise gave way to plot developments they found random and inconsistent, losing their engagement. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Says the movie lost them; despite an interesting start, criticizes inconsistent, random plot turns. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Says the movie 'really lost me' at the ghost hunter scene and calls it inconsistent, despite an interesting start. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter states the movie lost them and felt very inconsistent, despite having a mildly interesting start. Grok 4.7: negative — Lost interest; calls the plot inconsistent despite an interesting start. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They say the movie lost them and criticize its plot as inconsistent. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Says the ghost hunter scene 'really lost me' and calls the story inconsistent; opening was interesting but overall lean is disappointed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter states the movie 'lost me' and felt 'very inconsistent'. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #30 w 0.18 They were definitely above middle class that house was huge, one partner didn't even work, and bro has rich friends. Bro was like the poorest rich guy but they had money. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.768 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.17 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.65 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses the characters' wealth and living situation without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses characters' wealth and lifestyle without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — The comment discusses the characters' wealth and social class without giving any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses the socioeconomic status of the characters without expressing an opinion on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses characters' wealth and house, not the film's quality. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on the characters’ wealth and living situation, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses the characters' class and wealth status, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses character finances and plot details without expressing an opinion on the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #31 w 0.177 I was going "everyone in this movie is rich af." When I saw thier houses. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.557 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.66 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Observes the characters' wealth and houses without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Observation about characters' wealthy houses; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Observation about the characters' wealth and houses; no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a casual observation about the characters' houses without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Notes characters' wealth from houses; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on the characters’ wealth and houses, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on the characters' wealth as shown in the houses; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment focuses on characters' wealth and houses without judging the film itself. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #32 w 0.174 The book has a seance that fails, priests who refuse to help, ghost hunters just trying to go viral, and a ritual that fails. The parents try everything to save their kiddo in the book. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.494 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.86 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses events and the parents’ efforts in the book without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes the book's plot events; no explicit judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes plot elements of the book without giving any judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only describes events from the source book without judging the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses the book's plot only, no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses events and characters from the book without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Summarizes the book's plot elements without expressing any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plot points of the book without judging the film. | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #33 w 0.171 There's a ghost hunter in the book as well. I actually kinda liked it in that, if you were in that kinda situation, you would inevitably turn to occult and ghost hunter type people cos why wouldn't you. The book really sells the idea of trying literally every possible solution… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.151 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.11 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.63 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses and praises elements of the book without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses the book's ghost hunter element and praises the book, not a judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses the book's ghost hunter element and its appeal; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses an element from the source book without judging the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses the book’s ghost hunter, not a verdict on the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They express an opinion about the book, not the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses the book's ghost hunter character and narrative logic without giving an overall verdict on the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses the book rather than the film itself. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #34 w 0.169 Okay but like that Exorcist trailer though 👀 VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.572 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.25 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.56 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Comments on an Exorcist trailer, not the film Other Mommy. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comment reacts to a trailer for another film, offering no judgement of this movie. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment refers to a trailer for a different film (The Exorcist) and gives no judgment of Other Mommy itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment discusses a trailer for a different movie and gives no opinion on this film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Mentions an Exorcist trailer, not a judgment of this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on the trailer without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a trailer for a different film (Exorcist) without expressing any judgement of Other Mommy itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment only mentions a trailer without giving a verdict on the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #35 w 0.167 Laurence Fishburne reprising his role as fbi agent overseeing serial killers VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.649 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.10 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.68 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — The comment jokes about Laurence Fishburne's recurring role without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about Fishburne's casting echoing a past role; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes casting or a role without giving any judgement of the film's quality or recommending it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke/observation about an actor's role without expressing any opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Casting trivia only; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A factual casting or role observation, with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot-style observation about casting and character role; no judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses an actor reprising a role without expressing a judgment on the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #36 w 0.164 River didn't look bad either VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.431 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.78 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.43 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Comments on River's appearance, not the film's quality or whether they recommend it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comment on a character's or actor's appearance; no judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Brief remark about River's appearance; it gives no judgment of the film overall. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a brief remark about another subject or character without expressing an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Appearance remark only, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on River’s appearance, not whether the commenter liked or recommends the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment only remarks on a character's appearance; it expresses no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment only mentions an actor's appearance without judging the film itself. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #37 w 0.162 Give me a movie that tries to be a se7en or a zodiac and I'm in every time. I love detectives solving murders that are beyond evil. In fact if anyone has other movies like that let me know. I think Spiral is the only one I've watched besides those. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.077 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.86 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.63 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Expresses enthusiasm for detective murder mysteries generally, without judging this particular film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Expresses genre preference and asks for recommendations; no explicit judgement of this film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter discusses their genre preferences and asks for recommendations; gives no clear judgment of this specific film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter states they are 'in every time' for this type of detective movie and loves the subgenre. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Asks for similar detective films; no judgment of this movie. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They describe a genre preference and request recommendations without judging Other Mommy. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they love this kind of dark detective film and asks for similar recommendations, implying enjoyment of Other Mommy's genre. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Expresses enthusiasm for the genre and the specific style of the movie. | − | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | + | + |
| thread #38 w 0.16 girl with a dragon tattoo, longlegs, the wailing, insomnia, frailty, from hell, memories of murder, the exorcist iii VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.883 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.38 P(pos)=0.97 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.36 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Lists other movie titles without expressing any judgment of Other Mommy. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Just a list of other films, likely recommendations; no judgement of this film expressed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — The comment is only a list of other film titles, probably recommendations or comparisons, with no judgement of Other Mommy itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is simply a list of other movie titles without any judgment of the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Lists other films without judging Other Mommy. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only lists movie titles and gives no opinion about this film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Just a list of other films with no judgement of Other Mommy itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Listing other movies without expressing an opinion on the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #39 w 0.158 I think the very format of being a movie loses some of the best parts of the book. In the book it's described that in the beginning, Other Mommy would say nothing and simply stare from the cupboard at ~4 year old Bela, and Bela being so young didn't realise this was weird or… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.732 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.72 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.90 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Argues the movie format loses the book’s best elements and that the horror works much better in prose. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Says the movie format loses the book's best parts and the creepiness works much better in the book. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Mainly discusses book details and says the book works better in its format, without clearly judging the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses the book's strengths and why the story works better on the page without offering a verdict on the movie. Grok 4.7: negative — Says the movie format loses the book's best, creepiest parts and works worse. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They say the movie format loses the book’s best parts and that the material works much better in book form. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Compares the film to the book and describes creepy elements, but never clearly judges the film itself as good or bad. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter states that the format of the movie loses the best parts and works much better in book form. | − | − | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | − | − | 0 | − |
| thread #40 w 0.156 Exactly. The real horror of the book is how normal and unremarkable Other Mommy is to Bela until Other Mommy’s routine changes and she starts appearing in places she never was before. Also, I’m kind of disappointed that a party guest wasn’t the first adult to see Other Mommy. I… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.275 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Expresses disappointment that the film omitted a tension-building moment from the book. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Mostly praises the book; mild disappointment about one adaptation change, but no overall judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Expresses disappointment about a changed scene from the book but also calls the tension-building moment great; no clear overall lean on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter expresses disappointment in how the film adapted the book, noting missed opportunities for horror and tension. Grok 4.7: negative — Disappointed the film dropped a tense book moment they liked. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses the book’s horror and a hoped-for scene, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER 0.275 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter expresses disappointment with a specific plot choice and the execution of tension. | + | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #41 w 0.154 I suddenly want a Junji Ito manga adaption of the story. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.077 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.09 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.34 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Expresses interest in a Junji Ito adaptation, without judging this film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Wishes for a Junji Ito manga adaptation; offers no judgement on whether the film was good. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Expresses a wish for a Junji Ito adaptation of the story; no explicit judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Expresses interest in a manga adaptation of the story without stating a verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Wishes for a manga adaptation; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Expresses interest in a manga adaptation, but gives no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter wishes for a Junji Ito adaptation of the story, implying the film's horror premise appealed to them; a mild endorsement. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Expresses a desire for a manga adaptation without judging the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 |
| thread #42 w 0.152 I don't know if this is the best way to describe it, but the movie had an almost uncanny valley feel to it. The way the characters spoke to each other, the things they said, the quick transitions between locations. I felt like I wasn't watching a real movie at times. I normally… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.214 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.75 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes unnatural dialogue and abrupt transitions, finding the film too sparse in lore and dialogue. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes unnatural dialogue, abrupt transitions, and too little lore; felt unlike a real movie. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter describes the film as feeling unreal and criticizes its execution, saying it went too far in the wrong direction; overall critical. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Criticizes the dialogue, transitions, and lack of depth, stating it didn't feel like a real movie. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes unnatural dialogue, transitions, and unreal feel as too extreme. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film’s dialogue, transitions, and lack of lore, saying it sometimes didn’t feel like a real movie. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.214 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter felt detached and criticized the movie for going too far away from lore and dialogue. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #43 w 0.151 It felt like they recorded a bunch of trailers and clipped them together VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.361 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.66 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the film as disjointed, like trailers clipped together rather than a cohesive movie. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film as disjointed, like a string of trailer clips stitched together. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film as feeling like disjointed clipped-together trailers, implying poor cohesion and editing. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the film's editing and pacing, comparing it unfavorably to a disjointed collection of trailers. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the film as disjointed trailer clips, not a real movie. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — The comparison suggests the film felt disjointed and poorly assembled. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter says the film feels like trailers clipped together, a criticism of its construction and quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the film's editing and structure as feeling like disjointed trailers. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #44 w 0.149 When a movie is like this I call it a series of horror vignettes. The Nun was just a series of horror vignettes. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.361 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.71 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.51 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes the film as a series of horror vignettes without explicitly praising or criticizing it. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Dismisses the film as a disjointed 'series of horror vignettes', likening it to The Nun, a critique of weak structure. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Calling a film 'just a series of horror vignettes' is dismissive criticism of its lack of cohesion, comparing it to The Nun. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Describing the movie as 'just a series of horror vignettes' implies it lacks a cohesive plot. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Labels the film as vignettes without stating like or dislike. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Calling the film a series of horror vignettes, like The Nun, implies a dismissive criticism of its structure. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Labels the film a 'series of horror vignettes' and compares it to The Nun, implying a dismissive judgement of its structure and quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is describing the film's structure without expressing a clear like, dislike, or recommendation. | + | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | 0 |
| thread #45 w 0.147 That's a Rob Savage trademark, he's one of the most confusing horror directors working right now, everything he's directed is edited like that. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.72 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.74 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.31 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses the director’s trademark editing style without expressing an overall judgment of this film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on the director's editing style generally, without judging this film positively or negatively. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the director's confusing editing style as a flaw, though it's framed as a general trait, leaning negative on the film's style. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Criticizes the director's signature editing style, which is present in this film, as confusing. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses the director's editing style, not this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film’s editing style as confusing, linking it to the director’s work. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on the director's editing style as a trademark; no judgement of this film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses the director's style without expressing a clear verdict on the film. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | − | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #46 w 0.146 Absolutely this. The Boogeyman, his other horror film, was not well done. It’s mid at best. The minute I saw he was doing this one I lowered my expectations. Still didn’t like it. Maybe he gets his shit together someday and makes a classic, but this ain’t it. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.053 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Explicitly says they still disliked this film despite lowered expectations and that it falls short. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Commenter lowered expectations yet still didn't like it; says 'this ain't it.' Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter states they still didn't like the film, even with lowered expectations, and says it's not a classic. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter explicitly states they lowered their expectations and still did not like the film. Grok 4.7: negative — Explicitly says they still didn’t like it and this isn’t it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They explicitly say they still didn’t like this film and that it isn’t a classic. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter calls the director's previous film mid, says they didn't like this one, and doubts it's a classic. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter states they lowered expectations and still didn't like the film, calling it not a classic. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #47 w 0.144 Once they went to grandma's castle mansion next to the lighthouse by the sea, I could no longer take any of it seriously, and I was barely holding on already. The batshit seance scene is wear it really jumped off a cliff. It's not grounded in any kind of reality, and there is… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.948 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.88 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes absurd plotting, inconsistent tone, weak material, and distracting CGI, despite occasional praise for Chastain’s creepiness. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Calls film absurd, tonally baffling, impossible to take seriously; says Chastain deserves better material despite some creepiness. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter couldn't take the film seriously, found the tone baffling, criticized the CGI and material; only minor praise for Chastain being creepy. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the film's baffling tone, poor CGI, and weak material, stating they couldn't take it seriously. Grok 4.7: negative — Couldn't take it seriously; baffling tone, bad material, CGI undermines it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film’s incoherent tone, implausibility, and distracting CGI; brief praise for Chastain’s creepiness doesn’t offset the overall disappointment. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.948 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the film's tone, implausibility, and poor material, calling it baffling and advising the lead deserves better. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #48 w 0.143 I was thinking at some point I was watching a AI film because of the quick transitions and how sometimes they were talking ... it felt weird VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.36 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — The commenter criticizes the film's quick transitions and unnatural dialogue as weird and AI-like. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticises the editing and dialogue as weird and AI-like, which reads as an unfavourable judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter says the film felt like AI-made, with weird quick transitions and odd talking, which is implicit criticism of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the editing and dialogue delivery, comparing the movie negatively to an AI-generated film. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes transitions and dialogue as artificial and weird. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film’s transitions and dialogue presentation as weird. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter says the film felt weird, with odd transitions and dialogue suggesting AI-made, implying disappointment rather than endorsement. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter felt the film was weird and resembled an AI-generated movie due to quick transitions. | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #49 w 0.141 Really big fan of the way this got down to brass tacks in having the parents very quickly be in the loop on the supernatural bullshit that's going on rather than it being a drawn-out "oh, honey, there's no such thing as Other Mommy, it's just your imagination" kind of thing… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.232 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.63 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film for quickly involving the parents in supernatural events rather than prolonging a familiar disbelief trope. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter is a big fan of the film skipping the clichéd disbelieving-parents trope. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they're a big fan of a specific choice in the film, praising its pacing and avoidance of a tired trope. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the film's pacing and avoidance of a common horror trope. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the film for quickly involving the parents in the supernatural plot. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the film for quickly involving the parents in the supernatural events instead of relying on a familiar drawn-out misunderstanding. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — The commenter says they are a 'really big fan' of the film's approach, praising it over familiar tropes. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises a specific aspect of the film's plot handling, indicating approval. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #50 w 0.14 Yeah this was super refreshing VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.727 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.26 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calling the film super refreshing expresses clear approval. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calling the film 'super refreshing' is clear praise of the movie. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls the film 'super refreshing', a clear expression of approval of the movie. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter directly praises the movie by calling it 'super refreshing'. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the film super refreshing, clear praise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the film super refreshing, indicating a favorable reaction. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the film 'super refreshing', a clear enthusiastic praise of the movie. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter clearly praises the film by calling it 'super refreshing'. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #51 w 0.139 What I like about the movie is that the monster is out in the open for everyone to see instead of something that hides from everyone. Key differences from the book since that’s what a lot comments are about: Other Mommy is a bird-like creature in appearance in the book. Other… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.897 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.71 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly likes the movie’s openly visible monster; the rest discusses plot and book differences without criticism. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Opens with praise for the movie's monster being in the open; rest is book comparison without criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Opens with explicit liking of the monster being visible; the rest is book comparison and plot recap, but the stated opinion is favorable. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly mentions what they liked about the movie before objectively listing differences from the book. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly likes the visible monster; rest is plot/book comparison, no criticism. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Compares plot details with the book and speculates about the ending, but gives no clear judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER -0.897 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses book differences and plot details without giving an overall verdict on the film. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | 0 |
| thread #52 w 0.137 I don’t remember having an actual canon appearance in the book besides shapeshifting. Other Mommy impersonates Grandma in the book, it’s the biggest twist of the final act. Everyone dies at the end of the book too and Bella switches with her by saying yes in that one too. The… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.284 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.03 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.91 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses the book’s plot and ending without expressing a judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Compares book and film plot details without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment discusses plot details and differences from the book without giving any judgment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses plot details from the book without expressing any opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Book-vs-film plot comparison only; no judgement of the movie. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plot details and differences from the book without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter discusses book plot details and comparisons to the film's ending without expressing any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses book plot details and comparisons without expressing a verdict on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #53 w 0.136 I don’t remember having an actual canon appearance in the book besides shapeshifting. Copying from other comment: The books have a more bizarre and incomplete description. At one point it's mentioned that she might be blue, and has hairy arms and other parts, implying some sort… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.841 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.24 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.50 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses the book’s creature descriptions and effectiveness, without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses the book's creature descriptions and powers; no clear judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses the book's description of the creature and compares book to film adaptation, but gives no clear verdict on the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment exclusively discusses the character's description and execution in the source book without judging the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Book creature description and comparison; no clear film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They say the creature’s description works much better in book form, implying the film handles it less effectively. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses the book's depiction of Other Mommy and its horror mechanics; no judgement of the film itself is given. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses book lore, character descriptions, and plot details without judging the film itself. | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #54 w 0.135 Wow, that is a crazy ending in the book. No wonder people online were talking about how the movie would tackle it I honestly like grim endings like that and I personally would have preferred it. But I know for sure general audiences would have hated this bleak conclusion. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.382 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.62 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses the book’s ending and a preferred adaptation choice without judging the film overall. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses the book's ending and personal preference for grim endings; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses the book's ending and how the movie handled it, expressing a preference for the bleaker ending, but gives no clear verdict on the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses preference for the book's grim ending over the movie's adaptation, without giving an overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses the book ending and adaptation preference, not an overall film verdict. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They express a preference for the book’s grim ending, but don’t judge the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses the book's ending and what audiences would think; no clear judgement of this film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter notes the film avoided the grim book ending because general audiences would have hated it. | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #55 w 0.134 Bad movie and I loved it. It was just so fucking fun and funny. The entire theater was cracking up at all the ridiculous shit constantly happening. The movie wastes zero time in getting started and once it does, it's just a barrage of crazy shit with nothing making any sense,… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.667 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.44 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly loved it, praising its humor, relentless absurdity, campy horror, and entertaining set pieces. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it bad but loved it; fun, funny, enjoyable ride with insane set pieces. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it a 'bad movie' ironically but says they loved it, found it fun and hilarious, praising the over-the-top chaos. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Despite calling it a 'bad movie,' the commenter explicitly states they loved it and found it very fun and funny. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a bad movie but loved the fun, funny chaos. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Despite calling it a bad movie, they clearly loved its fun, funny, chaotic ride. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Despite calling it a bad movie, the commenter loved it, found it fun and funny, and enjoyed the ride. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Explicitly calls it a 'bad movie and I loved it' due to how fun and funny it is. | − | − | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #56 w 0.132 Did you post this exact comment on another thread or are you a bot VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.79 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.35 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — The comment questions another user's posting behavior without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Meta comment questioning another user; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — The comment asks whether another user is a bot or reposting; it gives no opinion on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is directed at another user and makes no mention or judgment of the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Accuses another commenter of being a bot; no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Asks about comment duplication or bot activity; gives no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — The comment accuses the poster of being a bot or reposting; it expresses no opinion about the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is an accusation about a bot, completely unrelated to the film. | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #57 w 0.131 Exact same comment, no reason to make two different comments on different discussion threads VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.296 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.47 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.30 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses posting the same comment across threads without expressing any opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Meta comment about duplicate posting; no judgement of the film expressed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment is about posting duplicate comments across threads; it gives no opinion on the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Meta-comment about posting in multiple discussion threads, with no opinion on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Meta remark about duplicate comments, no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter notes duplicate comments across discussion threads but gives no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a meta remark about duplicate posting with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses posting habits, not the film itself. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #58 w 0.13 This was marketed like any other supernatural entity movie so I was expecting that going in and that ended after the title screen. It took a while for me to adjust, but it's a monster movie. I think using that lens is that made it a fun watch. There was still a few things wrong… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.703 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.84 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.73 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — They found it a fun watch despite flaws and an initial adjustment to its monster-movie approach. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a fun watch and didn't have a bad time, despite noting a few flaws. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it a fun watch and says they didn't have a bad time, despite a few flaws; leans positive overall. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter acknowledges flaws and mismatched marketing, but ultimately concludes it was a fun watch. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a fun watch despite flaws; didn't have a bad time. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They found it a fun watch and say they didn’t have a bad time, despite some flaws. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.703 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter stated it was a fun watch and they didn't have a bad time. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #59 w 0.129 So...Ursula cheated on her ex-husband with Daddo, she then has a baby by someone else but Daddo being the upstanding doormat that he is stays to raise the kid and she rewards him by cheating on him with his best friend⁉️ I don't think the Other Mommy was the problem broski VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.686 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.17 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.50 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticizes a character’s infidelity and discusses the plot without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Jokes about character Ursula's infidelity; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on character behavior and plot events with a joke about the title; no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses character actions and plot details without expressing an opinion on the quality of the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot and character criticism only; no judgment of the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Criticizes a character’s behavior and reframes the story’s threat, but gives no opinion on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot recap and jokey commentary on characters' infidelity; no judgement of the film itself is expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the plot and character actions, indicating dissatisfaction with the film's writing. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #60 w 0.128 It's fairly obvious why Other Mommy exists because Bela's mom is a royal bitch: she's condescending and rude, cheats on her husband, had a baby from a ex and refused to tell her kid the truth, has no interest in spending time with her kid. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.9 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.94 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticizes Bela's mother and explains Other Mommy's existence without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Analyzes character motivation and criticizes Bela's mom; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot and character motivation (why Other Mommy exists); criticizes a character, not the film itself, and gives no verdict on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment hates a character and discusses the plot, but expresses no opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character criticism and plot explanation, no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Criticizes Bela’s mother and explains the character’s role, but gives no opinion on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes the film's plot and characters and explains its premise; no clear judgement of whether the film itself is good or worth watching. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot motivations and character traits without judging the quality of the film. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #61 w 0.127 I think it’s why OM was attracted there in the first place. She did even say it, that she sensed heart break imminent and wanted to “save” Bella from it. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.791 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.29 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses a character’s motivations and plot details without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot interpretation about Other Mommy's motives; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses character motivation and plot details without offering any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses plot points and character motivations without expressing any opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot theory about character motives; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a character’s motives and plot, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a character's motivation and plot interpretation without expressing any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot details and character motivations without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #62 w 0.126 To clarify, shes the daughter of her ex-husband. So that's why Daddo was accepting. He thought it was his, realized "oh it's from the dude she cheated on me with" and was all "well I want to be a dad so why not". That's why he's not upset of her not being his. He knows he was… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.947 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.88 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.80 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Analyzes characters’ motivations and plot events without judging the film’s quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Character and plot analysis explaining motivations; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Detailed plot and character interpretation with no explicit judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment exclusively analyzes character motivations and plot details without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot and character analysis only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment analyzes character motivations and plot events without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot analysis and character interpretation of the film with no clear judgement of whether the commenter liked it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot details and character motivations without expressing a personal verdict on the film. | − | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #63 w 0.125 It was... not good. I appreciate that they didn't go for the tired trope of "nobody believes this thing is real" and jumped straight to, "oh it's fucking real and what do we do about it?" but there was so much behavior that just came out bizarre because they believed this thing… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.97 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.92 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.95 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Explicitly calls it not good and extensively criticizes implausible character behavior despite appreciating one avoided trope. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Opens with 'not good'; one small appreciation, then extensive criticism of characters' illogical, bizarre behavior. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Opens with 'not good' and spends the comment criticizing illogical character behavior and tone; the one small appreciation doesn't change the overall negative lean. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter explicitly states the movie was "not good" and heavily criticizes the bizarre, illogical character behavior. Grok 4.7: negative — Opens with 'not good' and criticizes illogical, blasé character reactions throughout. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — The commenter explicitly says the film was not good and criticizes its characters’ implausible behavior. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Calls the film 'not good' and mocks its character behavior throughout; the overall verdict is clearly disappointed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter explicitly states the movie was 'not good' and criticizes its illogical character behavior and plot. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #64 w 0.124 When they set out all the weapons they had in the house on a table?? Like did you not see frank unsuccessfully try to shoot the entity? You’re just giving it sharp things to kill you with! VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.4 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.89 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Questions the characters’ weapon choices against the entity without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Jokes about characters' poor decision-making without judging the film's quality overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes characters' illogical decision as foolish, implying a plot-logic complaint, though it's mostly in-scene commentary without an explicit verdict on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment mocks a specific character decision in the plot without stating an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: negative — Mocks an illogical character decision as stupid writing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the scene’s characters’ decision as illogical, implying the film’s writing frustrated them. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a plot moment and characters' choices in the film without judging whether the film is good or worth watching. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses plot logic and character actions without judging the film itself. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #65 w 0.123 I mean at that point they had basically given up. Running away failed, going to the exorcist failed, they straight up said "We might as well go home and be comfortable" They weren't really expecting to win, they were just trying to go down swinging VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.581 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.89 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.77 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Explains the characters’ motivations and actions without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Explains characters' plot motivations without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Plot discussion explaining characters' motivations at a story point, with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses character motivations and plot points without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot interpretation of characters' choices; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses the characters’ expectations and actions in the plot, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plot events and characters' choices in the story, with no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot points and character motivations without expressing an opinion or verdict on the film itself. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #66 w 0.122 I immediately thought of when the ghost hunter guy said they can fling shit up to 100mph lol VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.477 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.24 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.56 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Recalls a character's line without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joking reference to a ghost hunter quote; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Jokey recollection of a line from the film; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke/reference without expressing an opinion on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about a scene, no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — References a line about the ghost hunter without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Quotes a movie line with a joke; no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is just quoting a funny line from the movie without giving a verdict. | − | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #67 w 0.121 A lot of the decisions you just described can likely be explained with them trying to keep some semblance of normalcy for Bela Especially with their little “party” before the final fight when Bela calls them out and says they could stop pretending As for the strangers at the… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.564 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.02 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.83 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Explains characters’ decisions and reactions without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Explains character decisions and plot logic without giving any judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Defends character decisions and discusses plot points without giving an overall judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment discusses character motivations and plot points without expressing an overall opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Explains plot choices; no judgement of the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses and defends the characters’ choices without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Explains characters' motivations and plot decisions in the film without expressing any overall like or dislike of it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plot decisions and characters without expressing a judgement on the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #68 w 0.12 Two things i love about the movie: 1. There is no waste of time in letting the parent believe their kid. just see it for themselves and go with the “nah fuck that i’m out of the house” 2. “Omg we forgot Vulchy” “Ye fuck that too honey” VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.12 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.59 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly loves two aspects of the movie, praising the parents’ reactions and humorous dialogue. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Lists things they love about the movie, praising parents' quick reactions and humorous moments. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter explicitly says they love two things about the movie, praising its pacing and humor. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they love specific aspects of the movie's pacing and character decisions. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly lists two things they love about the movie. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly love two choices in the movie, praising its pacing and comedic moments. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Lists two things they love about the movie, praising its pacing and a humorous moment; clearly favorable. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly highlights things they love about the movie. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #69 w 0.12 What the fuck was up with the scene in the playplace where she was bisected??? VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.617 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.93 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.85 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Expresses shock and asks about a scene without judging the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Confused question about a disturbing scene; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Expresses shock and asks about a scene, but gives no clear judgment of the film's quality or a recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter asks a question about a specific scene without expressing an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Shocked question about one scene, no overall film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Reacts with shock to a scene but gives no opinion on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks about a shocking scene's meaning without expressing any judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only asks about a specific scene without expressing a clear verdict on the film. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #70 w 0.119 Other Mommy didn't fully understand human physiology and/or reality. She had captured Bella but didn't want to tip that off to her father, so created a sort of decoy in his line of sight. But there was a pole in the direct line of vision and so the decoy was incomplete where he… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.722 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.03 P(pos)=0.95 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.60 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Explains a scene and character behavior without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Explains a plot detail about the decoy; mentions a creepy moment but gives no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter explains a plot detail about the decoy and the pole, with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely explains a plot point and visual detail without offering a judgment on the film itself. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the film’s unrealistic physiology and decoy logic. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They frame the visual trick as adding another creepy moment, suggesting appreciation of the film's scary effect. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot explanation of a decoy scene; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plot logic and creepy moments without stating a clear verdict on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #71 w 0.118 I think thats it but they really overdid the visuals for that in a way where that didn't come across at all. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.51 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes excessive visuals for obscuring the intended meaning. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes overdone visuals that kept the film's intended meaning from coming across. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's visuals as overdone, saying the intended point failed to come across; no offsetting praise. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Criticizes the film's visuals as overdone and failing to communicate the intended point. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes overdone visuals that failed to convey the intended effect. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the visuals as overdone and say they obscured what the film was trying to convey. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter criticises the film's visuals as overdone and ineffective, implying disappointment with the execution. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the film's execution, stating they 'overdid the visuals' and it 'didn't come across at all'. | 0 | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #72 w 0.117 It came across that way to me completely VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.44 P(pos)=0.98 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.33 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Expresses agreement with unspecified context, without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Agrees with an unknown prior point; no judgement of the film itself is evident. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — The comment is a vague agreement about an interpretation, with no stated judgement of the film's quality or any recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment agrees with an unspecified point without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Agrees with another comment; no independent film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — This agrees with an unspecified impression but gives no clear judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment only agrees with an unstated point about the film's content; no clear judgement of whether they liked it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Ambiguous comment lacking any clear judgment or opinion on the film itself. | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #73 w 0.116 Maybe I'm a dunce or something but I found it to be good and actually recommended it to people. I think there's a lack of empathy for the story being told here. There's a marriage that started off on the wrong foot. Unwanted motherhood. An affair. This is all happening while… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.962 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.69 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly calls it good, recommended it, and rates it 8/10 despite criticizing rushed character development. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Found it good, recommended it, rated 8/10; minor criticism of a rushed character turn. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter liked the film, recommended it to others, and gave 8/10; the only criticism is a minor note about rushed character development. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they found it good, recommended it, and rated it 8/10 despite minor pacing criticisms. Grok 4.7: positive — Liked and recommended it; 8/10 despite rushed character beat. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They recommend the film and rate it 8/10, despite finding one character-development turn contrived and rushed. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Says they found it good, recommended it to others, and rated it 8/10, despite minor criticism of one part. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The user explicitly states they found it good, recommended it, and gave it an 8/10. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #74 w 0.115 Personally, I think it falls down at the third act, but up until that point, I found it to be pretty entertaining. Sure, this thing’s nothing too extraordinary in a year full of strong horror flicks, but it’s certainly not a 19% Rotten Tomatoes/39 Metacritic level of trash in… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.973 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.91 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): mixed — Finds most of it entertaining and defends it against harsh reviews, but criticizes the third act and overall unoriginality. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Finds it pretty entertaining despite a weak third act and defends it against harsh critic scores. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Found it entertaining until a weak third act, calls it unextraordinary but not trash; balanced praise and criticism with no clear lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Finds the first two acts entertaining and defends it against awful ratings, but criticizes the third act and calls it unextraordinary. Grok 4.7: positive — Entertaining overall and not trash, despite a weak third act. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They found it entertaining and reject the harsh ratings, despite criticizing the third act and calling it unremarkable. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — VADER 0.973 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praises it as entertaining and defends it against bad reviews, but criticizes the third act. | + | − | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #75 w 0.115 Nah bro honestly I loved the film and will recommend it to others! 7.5/10 is my rating. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.852 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly loved the film, would recommend it, and rated it 7.5/10. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter says they loved the film, will recommend it, and rates it 7.5/10. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they loved the film, will recommend it, and gives it a 7.5/10. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the film, would recommend it, and gives a 7.5/10 rating. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the film, recommends it, rates 7.5/10. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They loved the film, recommend it to others, and rate it 7.5/10. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they loved the film, will recommend it, and rates it 7.5/10. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the film, gave it a positive rating, and would recommend it. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #76 w 0.114 Pardon my take on this film but the real demon is the mother: She cheated on her ex husband with her current husband. She had her exes baby and started a family and decided to cheat on this family too? Hell nah she’s the real villain. EDIT: Also the final scene with her husband… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.967 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.71 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticizes the mother's behavior and discusses the ending, without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Character critique and interpretation of the mother; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter argues about a character's morality and interprets the plot; no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter criticizes a character's morality and discusses the plot without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Moralizes about the mother and plot; no clear like or dislike of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses the characters and says the film may terrify stepfathers, but gives no clear judgment of its quality or recommendation. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter calls it 'Wild' and says it will terrify stepfathers; engaged, admiring reaction to the film's unsettling content, no criticism of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the film's impact, noting it will terrify stepfathers and describing the ending as wild. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + |
| thread #77 w 0.113 Reminded me of advice I got in my teens, don't recall from who. If they cheat to be with you they'll cheat on you. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.718 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.17 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.36 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Shares relationship advice prompted by the film without expressing an opinion on its quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Shares personal advice prompted by plot themes; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Shares a personal anecdote/advice relating to the plot's theme; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment shares a personal anecdote related to the plot without evaluating the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Life advice sparked by the plot, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Shares general advice about infidelity without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — The comment shares personal relationship advice and says nothing about the film's quality or whether the commenter liked it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a life lesson inspired by the plot, with no judgment of the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #78 w 0.113 I loved it! Pleasantly surprised they didn't spend half the movie with nobody believing the kid. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.848 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.68 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly loved the film and praised its avoidance of a prolonged disbelief trope. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says they loved it and were pleasantly surprised it avoided a tired trope. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Explicitly says they loved it and praises a plotting choice, being pleasantly surprised. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the film and praised how it avoided a common trope. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly loved the film and praised a narrative choice. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly loved the movie and appreciated its storytelling choice. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says 'I loved it!' and is pleasantly surprised by the story's handling, a clear endorsement. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the movie and were pleasantly surprised. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #79 w 0.112 The movie wasn’t great, but I loved that aspect. When they showed the dad seeing the entity that early it was a nice surprise. Fully went in expecting the typical kid’s making it up route we’re used to. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.935 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Overall calls the movie not great, despite praising its early reveal and avoidance of a familiar trope. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Says the movie wasn't great overall, while praising one surprising aspect; leans negative. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Says the movie wasn't great but loved a specific aspect (dad seeing the entity early); clear criticism and praise without strong overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — The commenter explicitly states the movie wasn't great, while praising a specific surprising plot element. Grok 4.7: negative — Says the movie wasn’t great, despite liking one surprise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They say the movie wasn’t great, despite loving the early reveal of the entity. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — VADER 0.935 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — The movie wasn't great overall, but they loved a specific aspect of it. | + | + | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #80 w 0.111 Damn I did not think this was that bad at all. I really liked that it avoided a lot of tropes in these types of movies. Things that many movies draw out for their whole runtime were resolved in minutes. Even the last shot worked for me on an emotional level as opposed to a… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.813 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Liked its avoidance of tropes and emotionally effective ending; overall found it decent despite modest expectations. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Defends the film, praises avoiding tropes, quick resolutions, and an emotionally effective ending; calls it decent. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter defends the film as decent, praises its trope avoidance and effective ending, with only a minor comparison to Hereditary. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they found the movie decent, liked how it avoided tropes, and praised the ending. Grok 4.7: positive — Defends the film, praises its choices, and calls it decent overall. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They liked the film’s avoidance of tropes and emotional ending, ultimately calling it decent despite reservations. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER -0.813 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter defended the film, stated they 'really liked' it, and found it to be decent. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #81 w 0.11 I feel like the ending was really sad. It seemed obvious that she was just faking it and still didn't really want to be there. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.629 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes the ending’s sadness and interprets a character’s feelings without judging the film’s quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Interprets the ending as sad and the character as faking; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment interprets the ending and a character's motives; 'sad' describes content, not a judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses the emotional tone and character motivations in the ending without judging the quality of the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Describes a sad ending and character motives, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They interpret the ending and describe it as sad, but do not judge the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses the ending and a character's motives (plot interpretation) without judging whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter expresses disappointment with the sad and bleak ending. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #82 w 0.11 Why doesn't this woman just divorce and live on her own and pay child support? It's modern era 2020's she can leave if she wants to. Be an adult instead of stewing in misery. Leave if you're really so unhappy. She's also the money maker so she's not fuckin trapped lol. I don't… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.87 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.71 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticizes a character’s choices and parenting, without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Criticizes the character's choices, not the film itself; no judgement of the movie's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Criticizes the protagonist's choices and lacks sympathy for her, but doesn't actually judge the film's quality or recommend it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter criticizes a character's life choices and lacks sympathy for them without evaluating the quality of the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Criticizes the character's choices, not the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Criticizes the character’s choices and lack of sympathy for her, but gives no opinion on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Criticises the character's choices and life situation, not the film itself; no judgement of the movie's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the main character's unrealistic behavior and expresses a lack of sympathy, indicating dislike for the film's narrative. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #83 w 0.109 Another aspect I really liked was just how physical and real Other Mommy was, like actually going around and having physical effects on the real world in ways that cause the police to turn up and such. Very rarely did she do something that was just an illusion. She was… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.817 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.42 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.82 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the monster’s physical presence and originality, despite noting some boilerplate horror elements. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the monster's physicality and originality; the 'boilerplate' remark is minor against clear enthusiasm. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter explicitly says they really liked the physicality of Other Mommy and that the monster felt fresh and different, praising the film's design. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises how the monster was portrayed, noting it made the film feel unique despite standard horror tropes. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the monster's physicality and originality despite noting boilerplate horror. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the monster’s physicality and originality, saying it made the film feel different despite familiar horror elements. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.817 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they 'really liked' the physical reality of the monster and its unique nature. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #84 w 0.108 I was trying to brainstorm what type of supernatural creature she’s the closest too, and I think she’s like a Hag. I know that’s not a ghost (as the ghost hunters call her) but I think that her MO and a lot of her features fit. 1) Hags are known for kidnapping children and… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.927 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.02 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.86 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Analyzes the creature’s folklore connections and appearance without judging the film’s quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Lore theory comparing Other Mommy to folklore hags; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment is a theory about the creature's folklore type with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment analyzes the lore and creature type of the antagonist without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Folklore theory about the creature; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment theorizes about the creature’s folklore parallels without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Analyzes the film's monster as a folklore hag; offers theories and character comparisons without judging whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses lore and theories about a creature in the film without giving a verdict. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #85 w 0.108 This movie is absolutely insane, sometimes in good ways, sometimes in bad ways. It was doing too much and too little at the same time. Chastain gives a killer performance though, bravo. I like that everyone can just see the entity off the bat. Hate how they dealt with that… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.201 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.97 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls it fun overall and rates it 6/10, despite substantial criticism of its execution. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Balanced likes and dislikes throughout; 'fun overall' but 6/10 with major criticisms, no clear lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Praises Chastain's performance and calls it fun overall, but lists many criticisms; 6/10 with no strong lean either way. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — The commenter lists equal pros and cons, calling it fun overall with a lukewarm 6/10 rating. Grok 4.7: mixed — Balances likes and hates; fun overall but flawed, 6/10. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Despite numerous criticisms, they call it fun overall and rate it 6/10. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER -0.201 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — The reviewer highlights both good and bad elements, concluding it was fun overall but messy with a 6/10 score. | − | − | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 |
| thread #86 w 0.107 Kinda crazy that like 2/3 of the trailer was not used in the actual movie VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.033 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.81 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.43 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Notes differences between the trailer and finished film without expressing approval or disapproval of the movie. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Observes that trailer footage was cut from the film; this is about marketing, with no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment notes a marketing/trailer observation (footage not used in film) without expressing a judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes an observation about the trailer versus the final cut without judging the movie's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Notes unused trailer footage, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Notes that much of the trailer was absent from the movie, without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on trailer footage versus the final cut, with no judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses trailer footage vs the final film without judging the movie itself. | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #87 w 0.107 I’m micro analyzing the affair plot but was uncle frank just being super diabolical naming the places in his living room that could be used as a bed? he was definitely taunting him VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.872 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.20 P(pos)=0.02 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.41 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Analyzes a character's behavior and the affair plot without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Analyzes a plot detail about Uncle Frank taunting; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter is analyzing a plot detail and character motive without giving any judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses a specific character interaction and plot point without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot theory about a character's motives, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about a character's intentions in the plot without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a plot detail and character motive (Uncle Frank taunting) without any judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing a specific plot point and character motivation without evaluating the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #88 w 0.106 The Coraline comparisons are driving me crazy. I’ve read and loved the book source material, and this is wholly different. People say that it’s copying Coraline, but that’s only because of the name “Other Mommy.” However, “Other Mommy” is the best name for a woman-like monster… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.82 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.77 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Defends the title and disputes Coraline comparisons, but gives no overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Defends the film against Coraline comparisons and praises the book, but gives no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Defends the film against Coraline comparisons and praises the title, but gives no clear overall judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment defends the title and praises the book source material, without giving a verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Defends the title against Coraline comparisons; no clear like or dislike of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They defend the film as distinct and praise “Other Mommy” as an especially fitting name for its monster. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER 0.82 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses comparisons to another movie and the source material without judging the film itself. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #89 w 0.105 I know I'm in the minority but i really enjoyed it. I very much appreciated how they completely skipped over the "Nothing is happening, we just need to ignore it" phase that every single one of these movies has. First time I've seen that I think. They were like OH SHIT from the… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.955 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.91 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly enjoyed the film and was impressed overall, praising its pacing and subversions despite minor criticism. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Really enjoyed it, praised fresh choices; minor demon criticism but overall impressed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they really enjoyed it, praising the skipped tropes and the twist with the fraudulent helpers, with only a minor gripe about the demon. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they 'really enjoyed it' and were 'overall impressed' despite a minor complaint about the demon. Grok 4.7: positive — Really enjoyed it and was impressed overall despite a minor flaw. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say they really enjoyed the film and were impressed overall, despite finding the demon dumb at times. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.955 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they "really enjoyed it" and loved several aspects despite minor flaws. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #91 w 0.104 Unpopular opinion: one of my favorite movies this year. I’m so tired of the same jumpscares, cliches, and cinematography. I absolutely think they marketed this movie wrong and pulled in the wrong audience for the movie. If we’re being realistic and judging in that manner, this… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.695 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.86 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls it one of their favorite movies this year and incredibly underrated, defending its creative choices despite poor marketing. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it one of their favorite movies this year and incredibly underrated; only criticizes the marketing. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it one of their favorite movies this year, praises its originality and execution, and defends it as underrated. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly calls it one of their favorite movies this year and praises it as underrated and original. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a favorite and underrated; criticizes marketing, not the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it one of their favorite movies this year and incredibly underrated; marketing criticism does not outweigh the praise. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter calls it one of their favorite movies this year and praises its approach as underrated. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls it one of their favorite movies this year and defends it against poor marketing. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #92 w 0.104 Very disappointing, the trailer was much better than the movie and it was misleading. There is absolutely no suspense at all because everyone knows about Other Mommy in the first 5 minutes. The majority of the movie should have been tense not knowing if it was Other Mommy or… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.942 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=1.00 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Explicitly disappointed, criticizing the misleading trailer, lack of suspense and scares, clichéd resolution, and unexplained scene. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Calls it very disappointing, not scary, no suspense, misleading trailer, criticizes tropes and abrupt scenes. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Calls the film very disappointing, criticizing lack of suspense, not scary, tired trope, abrupt scene, and misleading trailer. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter explicitly states the movie was 'very disappointing', lacked suspense, was not scary, and had baffling plot elements. Grok 4.7: negative — Disappointed; not scary, no suspense, disliked tropes and character. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They found the film disappointing, suspense-free, unscary, and frustratingly written. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Calls the film disappointing, misleading, not scary, and lists multiple criticisms with no praise. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter expresses clear disappointment, calling the movie misleading, not scary, and lacking suspense. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #93 w 0.103 I haven’t seen it and by all accounts it’s not good but I am tired of horror movies that spend a lot of runtime leading on if the monster is real and/or no one believing the main character. You can still have tension without using those tropes. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.883 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.93 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.92 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Hasn't seen the film; relays others' opinions and criticizes general horror tropes rather than judging this film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film; relays others' opinions and complains about horror tropes generally. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film; they only relay hearsay and complain about general horror tropes, offering no personal verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter explicitly states they haven't seen the movie and is only discussing horror tropes in general. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Commenter has not seen the film; only secondhand and genre complaints. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They explicitly haven’t seen the film; their criticism is of horror tropes generally. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter explicitly hasn't seen the film and is critiquing horror tropes generally, not giving a verdict on this film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter has not seen the film and discusses general horror tropes instead. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #94 w 0.103 Jessica and the kid actor did a great job with a ridiculous and inconsistent script. Lots of the plots serve no purpose. Like the conjuring story line. As a 90-minute movie it felt like 2 hours. The demon / other mommy should’ve stayed looking like the real mommy for it to make… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.509 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Praises acting but criticizes the inconsistent script, pointless subplots, sluggish pacing, and demon depiction. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Praises actors but criticizes ridiculous inconsistent script, pointless plots, and dragging pacing; overall negative. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Praises the lead performances but heavily criticizes the script, pointless plotlines, pacing that dragged, and the demon design; overall lean is negative. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Praises the acting, but heavily criticizes the script, pacing, and plot, resulting in an overall negative impression. Grok 4.7: negative — Praises actors but calls the script ridiculous, pointless, and poorly paced. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Praises the performances but criticizes the script, pointless plots, pacing, and demon design overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.509 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Praises acting but criticizes the script, plot, pacing, and logic, indicating an overall negative view. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #95 w 0.102 I guess I'm in the minority here thinking that it was a pretty great film, a solid 8/10 for me, maybe 7/10 on a rewatch. Maybe it's because my takeaway was that it's not a horror film, it's a supernatural film with horror elements like 1408, Black Phone, Doctor Sleep, etc. The… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.987 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.96 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls it a great film, rates it 8/10, and praises performances, direction, and character-driven storytelling despite minor flaws. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a pretty great film, 8/10, praises performances and visuals; minor ending criticism doesn't outweigh praise. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter calls it a pretty great film, 8/10, praises performances, direction and story, with only minor flaws like the ham-fisted ending. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly calls it a "pretty great film," gives it an 8/10, and praises the plot, acting, and direction. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a great 8/10 with strong performances despite a ham-fisted ending. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it a great film, rates it 7–8/10, and praises its performances, visuals, and character-driven story despite a minor ending flaw. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter rates it 8/10, praises performances, direction, and character focus, calling it better than formulaic horror despite minor flaws. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The user calls it a pretty great film, gives it an 8/10, and praises the acting and direction. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #96 w 0.102 Jessica fire your agent you are so talented you deserve much more VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.429 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.36 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.30 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Saying Jessica deserves better material and should fire her agent implies the film is beneath her talent. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Praises the actress but implies the film is beneath her talent, an implicit criticism of the movie. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the lead actress's talent, implying she deserves better roles; this reads as admiration for her performance in the film. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Implies the film is beneath the lead actress's talent and that her agent failed her by booking it. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Praises the actress’s talent, not the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Praises Jessica's talent and career prospects, but gives no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the lead actress's talent and says she deserves more, a clear endorsement of the performance and film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the film's quality or career choices by suggesting the actor deserves better projects. | + | 0 | 0 | − | − | + | − | 0 | 0 | + | − |
| thread #97 w 0.101 So many set ups and subversions, this movie was great The bear left at home and the parents not giving two fucks And then the set up of the guys house getting locked down and the mom immediately just unlocking everything with the passcode LOL VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.846 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly calls the movie great and enthusiastically praises its setups and subversions. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Explicitly says the movie was great, praising its setups and subversions with amusement. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says 'this movie was great' and praises its setups and subversions with amused enthusiasm. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states 'this movie was great' and praises the film's setups and subversions. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly calls the movie great and praises its setups and subversions. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly call the movie great and praise its setups and subversions. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter explicitly says 'this movie was great' and praises its setups and subversions. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states "this movie was great" and praises its setups and subversions. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #98 w 0.101 Overall 6/10, it had decent acting, some small points that I thought were funny (and were intended to be funny) a decent premise and buildup, but a lackluster finish. I liked how in the kitchen scene, they added little details to show that it was the Other Mommy. Wanting to… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.993 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.98 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): mixed — Rates it 6/10, praising acting and inventive scenes while criticizing the lackluster finish and unsupported narrative resolution. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — 6/10; praises acting, premise, kitchen and ball pit scenes, but criticizes lackluster ending and underdeveloped ideas. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Gives 6/10, praising acting, premise, and specific scenes, but criticizes the lackluster finish and underdeveloped ideas; no strong lean either way. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Gives a lukewarm 6/10, balancing praise for the acting, premise, and details with heavy criticism of the lackluster ending. Grok 4.7: mixed — Rates it 6/10: decent acting and ideas, but lackluster finish and unresolved plot issues. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They praise the acting, premise, and several scenes, but criticize the lackluster finish and unresolved or unconvincing story elements. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — VADER 0.993 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Gives a 6/10 rating, praising some elements like acting and specific scenes, but criticizing the ending and unresolved plot points. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #99 w 0.1 I will say there are some things about this movie I appreciate from a plot trope perspective. There are so many movies like this, in the sense that there's a threat one character is aware of, that you expect certain things like for that character to be doubted most the movie… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.972 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.95 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Appreciates early escalation and imagery, but finds the film incoherent, derivative, and lacking substance overall. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Praises early escalation and imagery, but says the rest had nothing to say, was incoherent and overused. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Credits some unique ideas, imagery and acting, but concludes the film 'had nothing else for me' and criticizes its incoherent plot, tropes and metaphors. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Appreciated early trope subversions and creepy imagery, but overall found it incohesive and lacking substance. Grok 4.7: negative — Praises a few ideas, but overall finds it empty, incoherent, and unsatisfying. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Despite appreciating some creepy imagery and genre ideas, they say the movie had little else and criticize its incoherent story. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.972 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Appreciated a few tropes and imagery, but ultimately criticized the plot, messy themes, and execution. | + | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |