Forgotten Island
← all movies. Each comment's label under every pathway (+ positive, − negative, 0 neutral / mixed / no verdict; hover a cell for the verdict).
Pick a pathway to show its verdict and rationale under every comment: VADER (old v1) · siebert+opinion (previous live) · Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) · GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE) · Claude Opus 5.5 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Gemini 4 Argon · Grok 4.7 · GPT-6 Luna (cheap) · Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) · Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap)
| comment (excerpt ≤280 chars) | VADER (old v1) | siebert+opinion (previous live) | Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) | GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE) | Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.7 | GPT-6 Luna (cheap) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank · score · bucket · Reddit · comments +/0/− | #1 83 Watch R 82 70/9/19 | #3 79 Watch R 75 48/34/16 | #8 58 Depends R 27 4/85/9 | #7 88 Depends R 93 49/43/6 | #7 89 Depends R 95 51/43/4 | #7 87 Depends R 92 46/47/5 | #7 89 Depends R 95 51/43/4 | #7 87 Depends R 91 50/40/8 | #7 88 Depends R 94 53/40/5 | #7 87 Depends R 92 44/49/5 | #7 84 Depends R 86 45/44/9 |
| thread #0 w 1.0 Having the credits featuring irl photos of the friends and family of the entire crew (from the actors, directors, writers, to the behind-the-scenes production staff) is one of the coolest ways I’ve ever seen the credits being approached in a film Really touching way to really… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.796 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.28 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the credits as exceptionally creative and touching, reinforcing the power of the film’s themes. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the credits as one of the coolest approaches, touching and reinforcing the film's themes. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the credits as one of the coolest, touching approaches that reinforces the film's themes, implying a favorable view of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter strongly praises the film's credits and themes, calling them cool, touching, and powerful. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the credits and how they powerfully prove the film’s themes. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They call the credits approach one of the coolest and find it touching, praising the film’s thematic impact. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the credits approach 'one of the coolest' and 'really touching', praising the film's themes. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the credits as one of the coolest and most touching ways approached in a film. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #1 w 0.707 Mitchells vs The Machines does the same thing and it works just as well VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.273 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.20 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Saying another film does the same thing and it works just as well implicitly praises this film's execution. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says another film does the same thing and 'works just as well,' implying the technique works here too. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Compares to another film (Mitchells vs The Machines) without clearly stating a judgment of Forgotten Island itself; ambiguous reference. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Saying something 'works just as well' in comparison implies it also works well in this film. Grok 4.7: positive — Implies the film works, equating another movie as equally effective. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Says the film’s approach works just as well as Mitchells vs. The Machines. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Compares Forgotten Island to another film without explicitly judging Forgotten Island's quality or recommending it; the 'works just as well' refers to the other film's approach, so it's ambiguous and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Compares the film to another movie without stating a clear verdict on this specific film. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #2 w 0.577 I think it's a really nice way to show the themes of the movie: memories and friendship. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.718 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.63 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.71 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises how the film conveys its themes of memories and friendship. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter praises how the film shows its themes of memories and friendship as 'a really nice way'. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter calls it 'a really nice way' of showing the film's themes of memories and friendship, which is praise of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises how the movie presents its themes of memories and friendship as 'really nice'. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises how the film nicely conveys its themes. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the film’s way of presenting its themes of memory and friendship. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises how the film shows its themes of memory and friendship, implying approval of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the film's execution of its themes, indicating a favorable view. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #3 w 0.5 I appreciated the restraint in the climax of not telling us what the memory Manang had lost was (or how exactly any of that happened). Better left to the imagination. Probably too many comic side characters, but I liked this a lot. I wasn't aware that H.E.R. was part Filipina,… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.939 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.88 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.90 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly liked it a lot, praising the climax’s restraint and central friendship despite minor criticism of side characters. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says they liked it a lot, praises restraint and the central friendship; only minor complaint about side characters. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says 'I liked this a lot' and praises the climax's restraint and the central friendship, with only a minor complaint about too many comic side characters. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states 'I liked this a lot' and praises the climax and central friendship. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly liked it a lot despite too many comic side characters. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say they liked it a lot, despite finding there were too many comic side characters. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says 'I liked this a lot' despite noting too many side characters; praises restraint and friendship dynamic. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states "I liked this a lot" despite minor critiques. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #4 w 0.447 Raissa is arguably even more wild than Jo as far as who’s capable of crazier things. Jo is more impulsive sure, but when Raissa’s in a confident mood, she actively and methodically plans and executes mayhem. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.852 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.23 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Compares characters’ behavior and capacity for mayhem without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Compares the two characters' behavior; offers no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Compares two characters' behavior and personalities without giving any judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses and compares character traits without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character comparison only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Compares the characters’ capacity for mayhem without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses characters Raissa and Jo's behavior without any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses character traits and plot without giving a verdict on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #5 w 0.408 Gosh, i love how Manang's wings wanted to stay with Raissa VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.637 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.48 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.82 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Expresses affection for a specific story detail, indicating enjoyment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Expresses love for a specific moment in the film, implying enjoyment. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter expresses affection ('I love how') for a specific detail in the film, implying a favorable view, though not an explicit overall recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter expresses fondness for a specific detail/moment in the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly loves a specific story moment, signaling enjoyment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Expresses affection for a story moment, indicating they liked the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — The commenter expresses affection ('i love how') for a specific detail, signalling a favourable view of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Expresses clear affection for a specific element of the film ('i love how...'). | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #6 w 0.378 Really clever ways to show their bond too, like wiping her glasses VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.7 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.32 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.61 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film’s clever depiction of the characters’ bond through small details. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the film's clever depiction of the characters' bond, such as the glasses-wiping detail. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the film's clever way of showing the characters' bond, implying approval of the film's writing. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises a specific aspect of the film's storytelling as 'really clever'. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises a clever filmmaking choice that shows the characters' bond. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises the film’s clever depiction of the characters’ bond. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the film's clever depiction of the characters' bond, a specific compliment about craft. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising the clever ways the film shows character bonds. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #7 w 0.354 Sidenote, someone mentioned the aspect of how a Manang may die/retire by offering the role to someone else, and its sorta like Raissa was like a chosen heir to take the mantle, someone who has always felt needing to restrain herself VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.573 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.10 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses character motivations and succession lore without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Thematic interpretation of plot and character without any judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a plot and character interpretation (Manang role succession, Raissa) without giving any judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses plot theories and character lore without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot theory about character succession, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a character’s role and possible succession without evaluating the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a plot theory about a character's role and succession, with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot details and character lore without expressing a personal judgment on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #8 w 0.333 Right! Jo encourages her to let loose a d be herself without all the pressure of trying to be the perfect everything. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.756 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.04 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.84 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses a character's encouragement and relationship dynamic without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a character's role and motivation without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a character's role in the plot without expressing any judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses character dynamics and plot points without expressing an opinion on the quality of the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Agrees about a character beat; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a character’s influence without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a plot moment about a character's arc without expressing any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses plot points and character interactions without judging the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #9 w 0.316 I think Dave is doing press with HER and Liza and I feel like there's at least one clip of him being very appreciative of being featured in a Filipino story but quickly saying he's not Filipino in a "I'm the token white guy" funny way. Also that his character is very popular… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.904 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.17 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.75 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses cast publicity, representation, and a character’s popularity without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses press appearances and trivia about an actor; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment discusses press appearances and trivia about an actor and his character's fandom, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses press tours, cast interviews, and fandom reactions without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Press trivia and character joke; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses press appearances and the character’s popularity, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses an actor's press appearances and a fan base for his character; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses press interviews, actor identity, and fan base without evaluating the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #10 w 0.302 Yeah from the trailers, I was kind of worried that that they would be too much opposites and that Jo was genuinely dragging Raissa down. But Raissa has a wild streak of her own and we see how their friendship uplifts the both of them. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.572 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.86 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.60 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film’s friendship portrayal, noting it avoids trailer concerns and shows both characters uplifting each other. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Worries from the trailers were dispelled; the commenter appreciates how the film portrays the uplifting friendship. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Initial trailer worries were resolved; commenter approves of how the film portrays the friendship uplifting both characters. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Expresses relief that the film exceeded trailer concerns by portraying a mutually uplifting friendship. Grok 4.7: positive — Worried by trailers, but praises how the friendship uplifts both characters. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The comment praises how the film portrays the friendship as uplifting for both characters. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses character dynamics and was worried from trailers, but gives no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter expresses relief and satisfaction with how the characters and their dynamic turned out. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + |
| thread #11 w 0.289 Dave Franco i went into this movie cast blind and throughout the movie, i thought Raww was voiced by Dante (which is funny because Dante Basco was originally going to voice the character). but i was confused because the more i listened, the more i realized i was wrong. and boom… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.579 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.08 P(pos)=0.17 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.70 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses guessing a character’s voice actor without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Anecdote about guessing the voice actor; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Anecdote about voice casting confusion and trivia; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses guessing a voice actor without expressing an opinion on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Cast/voice trivia only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter recounts a mistaken guess about the voice actor but gives no opinion of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses casting and voice confusion trivia without expressing any judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment only discusses trivia about voice casting without expressing a judgment on the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #12 w 0.277 That cut to the photo frame of Jesus when Jo embarrasses herself at the party had me cackling like a hyena VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.103 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.62 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises a comedic editing choice for making them laugh intensely. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter enjoyed a comedic cut, laughing hard, which signals enjoyment of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter enjoyed a specific scene enough to laugh hard, implying appreciation of the film's humor, though no explicit overall recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter expresses strong amusement at a specific comedic moment in the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved a comedic cut that made them laugh hard. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They found a moment in the film genuinely hilarious, expressing clear enjoyment. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a funny moment and laughter but makes no overall judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter found a scene hilarious, indicating they enjoyed the film. | + | − | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + |
| thread #13 w 0.267 I lost it at Disappointed Jesus too. I think that was my favorite joke of the movie. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.052 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.58 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Expresses enthusiastic amusement and praises a favorite joke in the movie. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter laughed hard at a joke and calls it their favorite, implying enjoyment of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter laughed hard and calls a joke their favorite of the movie, implying enjoyment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter expresses enjoyment by highlighting their favorite joke in the movie. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls a joke their favorite in the movie, showing enjoyment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calling it their favorite joke of the movie expresses enjoyment of the film’s humor. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter singles out a joke as their favorite part of the movie, implying enjoyment of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter enjoyed a joke in the movie and highlighted it as their favorite. | − | − | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #14 w 0.258 “Sup Jesus, you seen Raissa?” VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.37 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — The comment quotes dialogue without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Quotes a line from the film without expressing any judgement of the movie. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A quoted line or joke from the film with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is just a quote or joke without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Just a quote or joke with no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A quoted line with no opinion or judgment about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — A quoted line and a question about a character; no judgement of the film is expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is just a quote from the movie, expressing no verdict. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #15 w 0.25 I mean if anybody knew he'd be him right? 😆 VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.361 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.08 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.43 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A joking remark about someone's knowledge, with no judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joking remark about a character or plot point; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A vague joke or plot remark with no judgment of the film's quality or any recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke/observation about a person or character without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joking plot speculation, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joking remark about who someone would recognize, with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Vague joke or plot-adjacent quip with no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Plot speculation or joke with no evaluation of the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #16 w 0.243 I really enjoyed this, but I think some of the accusations of quirk chungus humour and sensory overload are very valid lol VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.656 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.92 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.92 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly really enjoyed the film, despite agreeing with criticisms of its humour and sensory overload. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says they really enjoyed it but grants that some criticisms are valid; leans positive overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says they really enjoyed it; acknowledges valid criticisms of humour and sensory overload but leans clearly toward liking it. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they really enjoyed the film, despite acknowledging some valid criticisms about the humor and pacing. Grok 4.7: positive — Enjoyed the film overall despite agreeing with some criticisms. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They clearly say they really enjoyed it, while conceding some criticisms are valid. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Says they really enjoyed it; acknowledges valid criticisms of humour and sensory overload, but the overall lean is clearly positive. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states they really enjoyed the film, despite acknowledging some valid criticisms. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #17 w 0.236 Also, did the trailers and marketing outright lie to us? I distinctly remember that many trailers mentioned "the longer we stay in the island, the more we will forget". That is categoraly untrue. It's more like The Hangover VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.16 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.91 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.81 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticizes misleading trailers and compares the plot to The Hangover, without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Complains the marketing misrepresented the premise but gives no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Complains the marketing misrepresented the film, saying it's more like The Hangover than the forgetting-themed premise promised; implies disappointment with the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Criticizes the misleading marketing and compares the plot to The Hangover, without stating whether they liked the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Criticizes misleading marketing, not whether the film itself was good. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They criticize the trailers’ premise and compare the film to The Hangover, but don’t say whether they liked the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Complains about marketing accuracy and compares to The Hangover, but gives no clear judgement of whether they liked the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticises the marketing and implies the film's plot makes no sense compared to the trailers. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #18 w 0.229 I totally remember that from the trailer. So that’s not the case in the movie? I still wanna see this with my kids either way but damn yeah that is weird VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.19 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.26 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.73 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Has not seen the movie; expresses interest and discusses a trailer discrepancy without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film; discusses trailer discrepancy and intends to watch with kids. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film; they discuss the trailer and plan to watch it with kids, giving no judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter states they have not seen the movie yet. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Hasn't seen the film; only trailer talk and intent to watch. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They still want to see the movie with their kids despite finding the trailer discrepancy weird. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter asks about a trailer detail and plans to watch with kids; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter has not seen the movie yet, only discussing trailers and intentions. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #19 w 0.224 It's a good film, but it feels weird that they really tries to hammer that in the marketing. It's more of a The Hangover meets Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind kinda deal VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.739 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.97 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly calls it a good film; criticism concerns the marketing rather than the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a good film; the criticism targets the marketing, not the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter states outright "It's a good film"; the marketing remark is a side note and doesn't undercut the verdict on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states 'It's a good film', only criticizing the marketing rather than the movie itself. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a good film; criticism targets marketing, not the movie. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They call it a good film; their criticism is limited to how the marketing emphasizes that. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Opens by calling it a good film; the complaint is about marketing, not the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states 'It's a good film' despite a minor complaint about the marketing. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #20 w 0.218 Yeah the marketing totally lied to us all. It’s. A plot point that doesn’t exist in the movie and it’s heavily put in all the trailers. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.176 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.90 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticizes misleading trailers and marketing, without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Complains the trailers were misleading but never judges the quality of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Criticizes the marketing for misleading trailers, but gives no clear judgement of the film's quality itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment criticizes the misleading marketing and trailers without offering a verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Criticizes misleading marketing, not the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Criticizes the marketing for advertising a nonexistent plot point, but gives no verdict on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Complains the marketing misled viewers about a plot point absent from the film, implying disappointment with the movie's delivery. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticises the marketing and misleading plot points. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − |
| thread #21 w 0.213 The Hangover but if it's Emperor's New Groove VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.49 P(pos)=0.03 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.47 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Compares the film to two other movies without expressing approval or criticism. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — A comparison joke describing the film's style, with no judgement of whether it was good or bad. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A comparison/joke describing the film's premise or tone, with no clear judgement of whether it was good or bad. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Compares the premise to other movies without expressing whether they liked or disliked the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke comparison only; no clear like or dislike of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A humorous comparison that describes the movie's premise without expressing an opinion about its quality. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — A joke comparing the film to other movies; no clear judgement of whether the commenter liked it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke comparing the premises of two films without expressing a verdict on this film. | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #22 w 0.209 Yeah idk if that line got cut or if it was just recontextualized in another scene, but I thought it was gonna be a race to beat the clock for them to not forget, but really the only timetable they were worrying about was if she was gonna miss her flight. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.485 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.09 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.56 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses an expected plot deadline versus the actual stakes without clearly judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses trailer line and plot expectations versus actual stakes without clearly judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a plot point and a possibly cut line; mild observation about expectations but no clear overall judgement of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses plot expectations versus reality regarding a trailer line without expressing an opinion on the movie's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot expectation versus what the film focused on; no overall judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They express disappointment that the expected race-against-time premise amounted only to worrying about a missed flight. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plot details and an expectation about a line and timeline, with no judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter expresses disappointment with the plot's lack of tension and misaligned stakes. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | − |
| thread #23 w 0.204 Just watched it and surprisingly loved it. I’m a fan of screwball humor when it’s done well (and I think it is here). I can see how this kind of humor can easily steer into lolsorandom territory but I think the defining factor tends to be the care that goes into it, and in this… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.954 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.76 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.75 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — They loved the film, praised its well-executed screwball humor and detail, and highlighted its rewatchability. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says they loved it, praises the well-executed screwball humor and detail, and finds it rewatchable. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they surprisingly loved it, praises the well-executed screwball humor and detail, and says it rewards rewatching. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the film, praising its well-done humor, high energy, detail, and rewatchability. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the film, praised its humor and rewatchable detail. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say they loved it, praise its humor and detail, and recommend rewatching. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter 'surprisingly loved it', praises the humor's care and detail, and says it rewards rewatching. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states they surprisingly loved the movie and praises its humor and detail. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #24 w 0.2 It's a very anime inspired movie which if you aren't used to will definitely throw some people off to say the least lol. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.592 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.79 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.70 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes the movie's anime influence and potential audience reactions without expressing personal approval or disapproval. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes the anime-inspired style and warns it may put some viewers off, but gives no personal judgement. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes the film's anime-inspired style and notes it may throw some viewers off, but gives no personal verdict or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes the movie's style and how others might react to it without expressing personal enjoyment or criticism. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Notes anime style may throw people off; no personal judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes the film’s anime-inspired style and its potential effect on viewers without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes the film's anime-inspired style and warns it may confuse some viewers, without clearly judging whether the commenter liked it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Describes the movie's style without expressing a personal like or dislike. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #25 w 0.196 I was actually pleasantly surprised at the relative lack of chungus humor... I expected more VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.586 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.73 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.67 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Pleasantly surprised by the film’s restraint with humor they expected to dislike. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Pleasantly surprised by less of the expected lowbrow humor, which suggests a favorable reaction. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter was pleasantly surprised the film had less of the cringey humor they expected, implying a favorable view overall. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter was 'pleasantly surprised' by the movie's restraint with cringe humor. Grok 4.7: positive — Pleasantly surprised by less crude humor than expected. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They were pleasantly surprised by the film’s relative lack of humor, indicating they appreciated that choice. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they were pleasantly surprised, implying they enjoyed the film's handling of humor over their expectations. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Pleasantly surprised by the lack of bad humor, indicating a favorable impression. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #26 w 0.192 My daughter with ADHD, autism genuinely loved it. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.599 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.95 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Reports that their daughter genuinely loved the film, conveying a positive verdict. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter reports their daughter genuinely loved the film, implying a positive recommendation. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says their daughter genuinely loved the film, which is a clear endorsement of it. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter states that their daughter genuinely loved the movie, which serves as a positive endorsement. Grok 4.7: positive — Reports the film was genuinely loved, a clear positive endorsement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter says their daughter genuinely loved the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter reports their daughter with ADHD and autism genuinely loved the film, implying a favorable verdict. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter's daughter genuinely loved the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #27 w 0.189 I love how the movie Predator always helps makes friendships across all genders and all nationalities VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.856 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.31 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.69 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — The comment praises Predator's ability to unite people, not Forgotten Island itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comment praises Predator's community appeal, not a judgement of Forgotten Island itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment praises a different movie (Predator), not Forgotten Island, so it gives no verdict on the film in question. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a lighthearted observation about a plot detail or reference to Predator without judging Forgotten Island. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Comment praises Predator, not Forgotten Island. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They praise Predator, not Forgotten Island. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses the Predator franchise's themes, not a verdict on Forgotten Island; it's off-topic. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses friendship themes of the movie Predator, not Forgotten Island. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #28 w 0.186 I loved how these 2 friends in this universe of a kids film bonded over a movie where an alien hunter rips the spine out of human beings. That's probably what they thought the Manananggal would do to them though. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.791 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.75 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.67 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — They explicitly loved the friends’ bonding over a violent movie within the kids film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says they loved a detail of the friends bonding over Predator; affectionate praise of the film's humor. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment jokes about characters bonding over a Predator-like movie within the film; 'loved' refers to a plot detail, not an overall verdict on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved a humorous detail regarding how the characters bonded in the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly loved a character bonding moment in the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly loved the film’s detail of the friends bonding over a movie. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER 0.791 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter starts by stating 'I loved how...', indicating a positive view of the film's detail. | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | + |
| thread #29 w 0.183 You son of a clap VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.82 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.51 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A joke or quote with no judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Appears to be a quote or joke referencing the film, with no judgement of its quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — An insult or exclamation with no assessment of the film itself; no clear opinion on whether it was good or bad. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is just a brief quote or joke without any judgement on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke or quote with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — An insult with no judgment about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is an odd insult or exclamation with no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Just a quote or joke, no judgment of the film itself. | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #30 w 0.18 I was wondering how they were gonna cover that line 🤣 VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.494 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.05 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — The comment discusses how a line would be handled without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Amused remark about how a specific line was handled; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Amused remark about how a line would be handled; no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke/observation about a specific line without expressing an overall opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Amused curiosity about covering a line; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joking comment about how a line would be handled, with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a lighthearted remark about how a line would be handled; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke about a specific line, not a judgment on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #31 w 0.177 I do like that we don't learn what Batiba took from Manang because that simply isn't our or anyone else's business VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.361 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.66 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film's decision to leave what Batiba took from Manang undisclosed. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Expresses liking a narrative choice in the film, with no criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter explicitly likes a narrative choice in the film (withholding what Batiba took), expressing approval of the storytelling. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises a specific narrative choice in the film ('I do like that...'). Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the film's choice to withhold a plot detail. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly like the film’s choice to keep Batiba’s actions unexplained. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — The commenter approves of a narrative choice, praising the film's withholding of backstory as appropriate, which signals a favorable view. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter expresses explicit approval of a creative choice in the film. | + | − | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #32 w 0.174 Someone said it has something to do with Jo's lola VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.09 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — The comment mentions a possible plot connection without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot discussion relaying a theory about Jo's lola; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Relays a plot theory or rumor about a character's grandmother, with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely discusses plot speculation or rumors without expressing any opinion on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot speculation only, no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about a plot connection without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot speculation about a character, with no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a plot theory without expressing any judgment or verdict on the film itself. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #33 w 0.171 I think it’s scary enough to know that losing your memory/sense of self can impact you so deeply that you become a monster. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.273 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.38 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.71 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses the frightening implications of memory loss without evaluating the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Reflects on the film's theme of memory loss creating monsters; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on the film's theme and its scariness, but gives no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses the themes and premise of the movie without giving a verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Thematic observation about memory loss, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They describe the film’s central idea as scary, expressing appreciation for its unsettling effect. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on the film's themes of memory loss and monstrousness without judging whether the film itself is good or worth watching. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a thematic element of the movie without expressing a clear like, dislike, or recommendation. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #34 w 0.169 I really enjoyed this one! I mean yeah, too much is happening at times but the animation was so gorgeous and the PH representation I think was so good as well. The characters I loveeee especially manananggal (played by Lea Salonga no less!), she was such an effective villain… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.987 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.83 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly enjoyed it, praising animation, representation, characters, and emotional impact despite occasional overcrowding. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Really enjoyed it; praises animation, representation, villain, emotional climax; minor pacing complaint doesn't outweigh praise. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says they really enjoyed it, praising animation, representation, characters and emotional climax; the only criticism is minor (too much happening at times). Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they really enjoyed the film, praising the animation, representation, characters, and emotional climax. Grok 4.7: positive — Enjoyed it overall; minor pacing critique outweighed by praise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They loved the animation, representation, characters, and emotional climax, despite noting that a lot happens at times. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Says they really enjoyed it, praises animation, characters, and emotional climax despite noting some overstuffed plotting. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they really enjoyed the movie, praising its animation, characters, and emotional impact. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #35 w 0.167 When her dad calls and tells her he isn’t sending for them broke me. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.421 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.29 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.38 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes an emotional reaction to a scene without judging the film’s quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says the father's phone call scene emotionally devastated them, implying the film moved them deeply. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says a sad scene 'broke' them, signaling emotional impact. Sadness praised as effect, though no explicit recommendation; leans positive. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Saying a sad scene 'broke me' indicates strong emotional engagement and praise for the film's impact. Grok 4.7: positive — Scene emotionally wrecked them; praise of the film's impact. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Saying the scene broke them suggests the film’s emotional moment affected them powerfully. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says a scene 'broke me' emotionally, a sign of being moved by the film; no criticism expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising the emotional impact of the scene indicates a positive connection to the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #36 w 0.164 And the fact she never told Raissa but made the best of their time together. I'm glad Raissa got to see that memory because she was horrible to Jo. I get it had to be hard being the "responsible" one, but we learn she's just as wild if not more. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.813 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.78 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses character behavior and a plot revelation without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses characters and plot events without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot and character dynamics (Raissa and Jo) without giving an overall judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses plot points and character dynamics without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character and plot discussion only, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They discuss character behavior and a story memory, but do not judge the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plot and character motivations (Raissa and Jo) without any judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot points and character dynamics without expressing an overall judgment of the film. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #37 w 0.162 There’s this lingering resentment that’s shown in the montage when Raissa refuses to fist bump Jo because of the trouble she puts them into, and I love that they call back to that here. Raissa didn’t consider Jo’s motivations and how conflicted she was when hiding the sand… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.696 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.68 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.85 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises character development and callbacks, defends previously criticized pacing, and expresses a desire to rewatch. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises character writing and callbacks, wants to rewatch, and admits being too hard on its pacing. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the callback and character writing, says they were too hard on the film over pacing, and wants to rewatch; leans favorable. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the character dynamics and callbacks, and wants to rewatch it while excusing their prior pacing complaints. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises storytelling choices, wants a rewatch, and walks back pacing criticism. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the character writing and callback, say it works, and reconsider their earlier pacing criticism. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER -0.696 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter re-evaluates their stance, loves the character dynamics, and states they need to watch it again. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #38 w 0.16 The moment Jo said her dad was in the US and would get her soon, I actually assumed something even worse and thought "wow they're going there??" VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.264 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.32 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.51 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes an assumption about a plot development without judging the film’s quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Shares a plot reaction and assumption without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a personal reaction to a plot moment and speculation about where the story was heading, with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter discusses a specific plot moment and their reaction to it without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot reaction only; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They react to a plot moment but do not judge the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a plot moment and the commenter's assumption, with no judgement of whether they liked the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing a plot point and making a prediction, without expressing an opinion on the film itself. | + | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #39 w 0.158 I thought they were gonna do something symbolically clever with the Manananggal, like Jo is the lower half that stays rooted in the Motherland, and Raizza is the top that flies off, i think that woulda been fun playing with the idea a bit more, instead of the rocketship. Like… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.985 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.01 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.67 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): mixed — Criticizes missed symbolic opportunities but appreciates the heart put into the film, without a clear overall lean. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Wishes the symbolism had been used more cleverly, but appreciates the film's heart; no clear overall lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Critiques the missed creative opportunity (rocketship vs. Manananggal symbolism) but appreciates the heart put into it; no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Offers a minor story rewrite idea, but ultimately expresses appreciation for the heart put into the film. Grok 4.7: mixed — Wishes for a cleverer Manananggal idea, but appreciates the film’s heart. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They criticize the rocketship choice and say another idea would be more fun, while appreciating the heart behind the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — VADER 0.985 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Critiques the plot and choices, but appreciates the heart and is happy for friends involved. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #40 w 0.156 I thought the symbolism was going to be Raissa was like the vampire demon who flew off with wings and Jo was like the memory demon who stayed stuck, and the vampire demon and memory demon were best friends before too. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.883 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.04 P(pos)=0.12 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.70 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses symbolism and character parallels without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Shares a symbolism theory about characters without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter shares a theory about the film's symbolism and characters without giving any judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses plot symbolism and character parallels without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Symbolism theory about characters; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about the film’s symbolism and character parallels without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Offers a personal theory about symbolism and characters without any judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is only discussing plot theories and symbolism without expressing a verdict on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #41 w 0.154 I feel that even if it wasn’t explicit, that connection is still very much there. Raissa states at the end that without Jo, she never would have had the courage to go to CalTech, and she probably wouldn’t have had any other friends, which would be a life similar to Batiba.… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.884 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.14 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.61 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film’s subtle thematic connections and appreciates that it avoids heavy-handed exposition. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Mostly thematic analysis, but explicitly appreciates the film's subtle, non-heavy-handed handling of its themes. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Mostly thematic analysis, but explicitly appreciates the film's subtlety and says it avoided heavy-handed themes, which signals a favorable view. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter analyzes the themes and explicitly appreciates the film's subtle, non-heavy-handed approach to its narrative connections. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the film’s restraint and subtle thematic handling. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They appreciate the film’s restraint in handling its themes. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER 0.884 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Appreciates the subtle themes and restraint of the movie, avoiding heavy-handedness. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + |
| thread #42 w 0.152 I think they did just that. Lol Raissa stole the wings therfore she was the top of the Manananggal. And Jo sacrificed herself to stay on the island and lose all her memories in order to save Raissa. Raissa was soaring literally after stealing the wings. As well as her going to… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.421 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.07 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.96 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Analyzes plot symbolism and character parallels without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Interprets symbolism and plot details without expressing whether they liked or disliked the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter discusses plot symbolism and interpretation of the Manananggal metaphor without stating whether they liked the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses plot themes and symbolism without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot symbolism discussion only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses the film’s symbolism and plot without expressing an opinion about its quality. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Offers a symbolic plot interpretation of the Manananggal and characters; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses plot points and theories without expressing a clear like or dislike of the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #43 w 0.151 I didn't find the movie overstimulating, should I get checked for ADHD? But for real, I think the pacing works because some things in the movie make no sense if you think about it for too long. Sometimes you just gotta turn your brain off, especially if you have a serious or… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.681 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.87 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Defends the pacing and endorses the movie as undemanding entertainment despite its logical flaws. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Defends the pacing and frames it as enjoyable turn-your-brain-off fun, despite admitting plot logic issues. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Defends the film's pacing as working and as good brain-off end-of-week entertainment, despite plot not making sense; leans favorable. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter defends the pacing and appreciates the film as good, mindless entertainment despite plot holes. Grok 4.7: positive — Defends the pacing and endorses it as enjoyable brain-off entertainment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say the pacing works and recommend it as a turn-your-brain-off movie. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says pacing works and suggests turning brain off for it; implicitly endorses the film as a good watch, though with a mild note about plot logic. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter defends the film's pacing and recommends it for unwinding at the end of the week. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #44 w 0.149 I have ADHD and I found it overstimulating. But the volume in my theater was also so loud that during the karaoke section in the middle of the movie, my ears got fuzzy sounding like I was at a concert VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.502 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.67 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Found the film overstimulating, with excessively loud theater volume worsening the experience. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Found the film overstimulating; complaint mostly about the experience, which leans negative though partly theater volume. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter found the film overstimulating and uncomfortably loud; no praise offered, so the overall experience leans negative. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the film as overstimulating, alongside complaining about the theater volume. Grok 4.7: negative — Found the film overstimulating, with no praise or recommendation. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They found the movie overstimulating, expressing a negative viewing experience. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.502 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Found it overstimulating and had a poor theater audio experience. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | − |
| thread #45 w 0.147 so.... normal filipino karaoke environment? :D VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.617 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.14 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.57 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A joke comparing the setting to Filipino karaoke, without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — A joke comparing a scene to Filipino karaoke culture, with no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joking remark about Filipino karaoke culture, with no judgment of the film's quality or any recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke about a cultural element without offering any judgment on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joking scene observation, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joking observation about the setting, with no clear judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Vague joke about karaoke environment; no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a cultural joke/reference about karaoke and does not judge the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #46 w 0.146 There's a lot to like about this one. Heartfelt, beautiful, funnier than I expected it to be, and a great love letter to a culture that doesn't get a lot of representation in mainstream western media. But lord was it a bit too frantic for my taste. No scene had room to breathe,… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.891 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.96 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Despite criticizing frantic pacing, they praise its heart, beauty, humor, and representation, ultimately calling it a pretty good movie. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Praises heart, beauty, humor and representation but criticizes frantic pacing; ends calling it a 'pretty good movie.' Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Strong praise (heartfelt, beautiful, funny, cultural representation) balanced by real criticism of frantic pacing; ends as 'pretty good movie', no clear lean. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Despite criticizing the frantic pacing, they praise its heart, humor, and beauty, concluding it is a 'pretty good movie'. Grok 4.7: mixed — Praises heart and humor but criticizes frantic pacing; calls it only pretty good. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Strongly praises its heart, beauty, humor, and representation; pacing is criticized, but the overall assessment is favorable. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.891 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praises heartfelt and fun elements, but criticizes the frantic pacing and overcrowded scenes. | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | 0 |
| thread #47 w 0.144 I just watched it, and I felt the same way, especially with how frantic it felt. At times, the story seemed a bit scattered, but overall, I really liked the movie. Growing up Filipino without much representation, and now having kids of my own, it was really refreshing to see so… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.626 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.61 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly really liked the movie overall, despite scattered storytelling, and appreciated its Filipino cultural representation. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Notes a scattered story but says they really liked it and praises the Filipino representation. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Acknowledges a frantic, scattered story but says overall they really liked it, praising the refreshing Filipino cultural representation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Despite noting a scattered story, the commenter explicitly states they overall really liked the movie and praised its cultural representation. Grok 4.7: positive — Notes frantic, scattered storytelling but overall really liked the film and representation. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They acknowledge some scattered storytelling but say they really liked the movie and valued its cultural representation. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Notes scattered story but says overall they really liked the movie and found the representation refreshing. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Despite mentioning scattered elements, the user explicitly states they overall really liked the movie. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #48 w 0.143 I know what you mean. Overall I enjoyed it but I thought they missed an opportunity to write an original song for the 2 best friends to help promote and elevate the film. Look at what the song “Golden” did for kpop demon hunters last year. Plus singing songs are integral to… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.975 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.97 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — They explicitly enjoyed the film overall, despite criticizing the missed opportunity for an original song. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says they enjoyed it overall; the missed original-song opportunity is a minor criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they overall enjoyed the film, with a minor critique about a missed opportunity for an original song. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they enjoyed the film overall, despite noting a missed opportunity regarding an original song. Grok 4.7: positive — Overall enjoyed the film despite criticizing a missed song opportunity. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say they enjoyed the film overall, despite wishing it had included an original song. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Says 'Overall I enjoyed it'; the song criticism is a minor note within a generally positive verdict. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states 'Overall I enjoyed it', indicating a positive verdict despite a minor criticism. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #49 w 0.141 They did write one although it wasn’t used in the main part of the movie, just the credits https://youtu.be/vtZgwKb5Bkw?si=d1sABcTI2bD0f9F6 VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.361 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.18 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses something written for the credits without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Shares trivia about a song used in the credits; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Shares trivia and a link about a song used in the credits, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment shares trivia and a link regarding a song in the credits without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Trivia about unused credits material, no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Mentions a song used in the credits, but gives no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is about a song used in the credits, shared as a link; no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a song and shares a link without evaluating the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #50 w 0.14 I really liked it. The friendship between Jo and Raissa felt genuine, solid, and supportive. It would’ve been easy to screw that up and make Jo genuinely someone who is dragging Raissa down, and Raissa truly resenting her for it, but fortunately they didn’t make that mistake.… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.988 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.63 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly liked the film, praising its genuine central friendship while treating superfluous side characters as minor flaws. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Really liked it, praises genuine friendship; minor side-character criticism excused as genre convention. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they really liked it and praises the central friendship; minor complaint about superfluous side characters doesn't change the overall positive lean. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states 'I really liked it' and praises the genuine portrayal of the central friendship. Grok 4.7: positive — Clearly liked the film; minor side-character criticism doesn't outweigh praise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly liked the movie and praised its central friendship, while noting only a minor flaw with side characters. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.988 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states 'I really liked it' and praises the core friendship and story despite minor flaws. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #51 w 0.139 Fr the “who let the dogs out” scene was perfectly emblematic of Jo. Chaotic and random, but also super empathetic and heartfelt. Grounding her friend and knowing exactly when and how to calm her in a crazy moment VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.965 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.23 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.91 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the scene as empathetic and heartfelt, highlighting its effective characterization and emotional grounding. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises a scene as perfectly capturing the character, heartfelt and empathetic; implies appreciation of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a scene and character traits (Jo) affectionately, but gives no explicit verdict on the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises a specific scene and character writing as 'perfectly emblematic', 'empathetic', and 'heartfelt'. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises a scene as perfectly emblematic, empathetic, and heartfelt. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises the scene as emblematic, empathetic, and heartfelt, expressing clear appreciation for the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a character's behavior in a scene and praises the character, but gives no clear judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises a specific scene and character development as perfectly emblematic and heartfelt. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | + |
| thread #52 w 0.137 as a filipino, this is an absolute win. still can’t believe dreamworks backed this movie. I had fun with it, and seeing the folklore creatures I feared as a kid animated is so cool to see. the mananangal used to creep me the fuck out as a kid. I remember watching a shitty low… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.682 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.74 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls the film an absolute win, had fun, and praises its animated folklore creatures and filmmakers. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it an absolute win, had fun, loved the animated folklore creatures, shouts out the filmmakers. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it 'an absolute win', says they had fun, loved seeing Filipino folklore animated, and praised the filmmakers. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter calls the film an 'absolute win', says they had fun, and praises the makers. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it an absolute win and says they had fun with it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it an absolute win, says they had fun, praises the animated folklore creatures, and thanks the filmmakers. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says it's an absolute win, had fun, and praises the film's folklore creatures and crew. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states "this is an absolute win" and "I had fun with it", clearly praising the film. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #53 w 0.136 best part was seeing Jo & Raissa re create the Manananggal in the play, see Manang be so menacing (great depiction), and J&R continue to fangirl. i didn't expect it but Manang is my dark horse fav character of the movie VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.889 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.24 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.68 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the menacing depiction and highlights favorite scenes and a favorite character, indicating enjoyment. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enjoys favorite moments, praises the menacing Manang depiction, and names a surprise favorite character. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter praises specific scenes and calls Manang their dark horse favorite character of the movie, showing enjoyment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises specific scenes, calls the depiction 'great', and enthusiastically names a favorite character. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises depiction and names a favorite character; no criticism. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the depiction and call Manang their favorite character in the movie. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the best parts, great depiction, and calls a character their favorite, indicating enjoyment of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter highlights the best parts of the movie and expresses fondness for a character. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #54 w 0.135 “I know she tried to kill us - but she is SO cool.” VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.52 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.36 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Quotes dialogue praising a character, without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — A quote or joke about a character; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Quote about a character being cool; admires a character but gives no explicit judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is just a quote or joke from the movie without any judgment on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Quoted line about a character, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Praises a character, but gives no opinion on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter praises a character as cool, but gives no clear verdict on the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Quote from the film or a joke about a character, no direct review of the movie. | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #55 w 0.134 The graduation celebration was so authentic to Filipino culture imo. My favorite part was the graduation tarpulin VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.459 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.57 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.89 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the celebration's cultural authenticity and singles out a favorite detail. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the cultural authenticity of the graduation scene and names a favorite part, showing enjoyment of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the graduation scene's cultural authenticity and names it as their favorite part, implying a favorable view of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the cultural authenticity of a scene and mentions their favorite detail. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises a scene as authentic and their favorite part. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises the film’s authentic portrayal of Filipino culture and identifies a favorite part. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the film's cultural authenticity and names a favorite part, implying a favorable view of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises an authentic cultural aspect and highlights a favorite part of the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #56 w 0.132 I cringed so hard about Raissa's extended family jesting her about marrying Tom Cruise because she's going to California to study at Caltech. Some will laugh it off as a cringe joke but I cannot express how utterly prevalent that kind of thinking is within Filipinos because… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.609 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.98 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.81 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticizes the family's anti-intellectual attitudes and real-world smart shaming, not the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on a scene's cultural accuracy and Filipino anti-intellectualism; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter discusses a scene's cultural realism and cringe over Filipino attitudes, without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses the cultural accuracy and realism of a character's family dynamic without stating an opinion on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: negative — Cringes at a film joke as smart-shaming, criticizing that scene. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Criticizes the characters’ joke and broader social attitudes, but does not judge the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a scene's cultural depiction and anti-intellectualism without clearly judging whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the film's writing/jokes regarding smart shaming and Filipino culture. | − | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #57 w 0.131 As a Mexican American the similarities gave me authentic second hand embarrassment. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.077 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.38 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.50 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes a personal reaction to cultural similarities without judging the film’s quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter finds the cultural portrayal relatable and authentic, implying approval of the film's representation. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Says the film's portrayal gave them 'authentic second hand embarrassment', which implies criticism of the film's cultural depiction, though not stated outright. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter expresses second-hand embarrassment over the film's similarities to another work or culture, indicating disapproval. Grok 4.7: negative — Second-hand embarrassment signals criticism of the film's portrayal. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They imply the film's portrayal felt authentic and relatable, though it caused secondhand embarrassment. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter says the film's portrayal gave them second-hand embarrassment, implying they disliked its depiction of Mexican Americans. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Authentic second hand embarrassment indicates disapproval of the film's portrayal. | + | 0 | − | 0 | + | − | − | − | + | − | − |
| thread #58 w 0.13 The part where the parents presented a picture slideshow / powerpoint of their daughter, not understanding how embarrassing it was for her is so real. My parents did the exact same thing to me haha VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.635 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.10 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.84 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Relates a scene to personal experience without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Shares a relatable personal anecdote about a scene without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Relates a scene to personal experience as relatable, but gives no overall judgement or recommendation of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter relates to a specific scene without expressing an overall opinion on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Relates to a realistic scene; no overall film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Relates to a scene from personal experience without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Relates a personal experience to a scene; no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter relates a specific scene to a personal anecdote without expressing a judgment on the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #59 w 0.129 for me, it was Tita pointing to Jo exactly where she needs to go https://youtu.be/NE8HqyEhxww?t=2m6s VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.90 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.61 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — References a specific character moment without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Shares a favorite scene moment with a link but gives no explicit judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Points to a specific scene with a video link, but gives no clear judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely references a specific scene/timestamp without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Points to a specific scene without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Interprets a moment in the film but does not express an opinion about its quality. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Shares a timestamped link to a scene pointing at a moment, with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment only shares a specific scene and link without judging the film. | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #60 w 0.128 I absolutely lost it at the lip pointing. One of my best friends is half Filipino and his mom does it. He said he can't date a Filipino woman if she does it cause it reminds him too much of his mom. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.692 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.57 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Shares amusement at a gesture and a personal anecdote without judging the film overall. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Laughing hard at a joke ('absolutely lost it') shows enjoyment, though no explicit overall judgement. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Amused by a cultural detail (lip pointing) and shares a personal anecdote, but gives no explicit judgment of the film overall. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter found a specific cultural detail in the movie hilarious, indicating a positive reaction. Grok 4.7: positive — Lost it laughing at a scene, showing clear enjoyment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They share an amused personal anecdote about lip pointing, without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment recounts a personal anecdote about lip pointing and a friend's mom; it gives no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a specific cultural detail and a personal anecdote without evaluating the film itself. | + | − | − | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #61 w 0.127 I really enjoyed this movie. I thought it was legit hilarious most of the time. I didn't find it overstimulating that some people are saying. The cringe factor was low for me aside from the freestyle scene. I was a big fan of the contrasting animations styles and the facial… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.844 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.80 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.72 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly enjoyed the movie, praising its humor and animation despite minor criticism of the ending and freestyle scene. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enjoyed it, found it hilarious, praised animation styles; minor plot and cringe quibbles don't change the positive lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they really enjoyed it, found it hilarious, praised the animation styles, and called it a fun ride; only minor plot criticism. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they really enjoyed the movie, praising its humor and animation despite minor flaws. Grok 4.7: positive — Enjoyed it overall; minor note that the plot wrapped up too succinctly. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They enjoyed the movie, found it hilarious and fun, and praised its animation despite minor criticisms. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.844 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states they really enjoyed the movie and found it to be a fun ride. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #62 w 0.126 The freestyle scene came close, but it kinda won me over by the end of it. The one scene that made me cringe though, was Raww smacking himself repeatedly with coconuts until he passed out when trying to remember the previous night at the market. But, still just a small scene in… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.808 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.58 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.65 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — They explicitly loved the movie overall, despite cringing at one small scene. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Minor cringe moments noted, but commenter explicitly says they loved the movie overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says the film won them over and they loved it overall, despite cringing at one small coconut scene. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the movie overall despite one cringeworthy scene. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the movie overall despite one cringe scene. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They loved the movie overall despite one scene making them cringe. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says the freestyle scene won them over and calls it a movie they loved overall, despite one cringe scene. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states it is a movie they loved overall, despite minor cringe. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #63 w 0.125 I went into this completely blind. Had never heard of the move, had seen zero trailers. My 9 year old daughter started begging to go see it when she realized it was out and said that it was supposed to be the best dreamworks movie ever. I completely discounted that and if… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.924 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.91 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.44 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Had a blast watching it, calls it potentially Dreamworks’ best, and is amazed by its quality. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter calls it possibly the best Dreamworks movie ever and says they had a blast watching it. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter enthusiastically praises the film, saying it might be the best DreamWorks movie ever, and that they had a blast watching it. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter had a blast watching the movie and declared it might be the best DreamWorks movie ever. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it possibly the best DreamWorks movie and had a blast. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it possibly the best DreamWorks movie ever and says they had a blast watching it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter went in skeptical but says it might be the best DreamWorks movie ever and had a blast. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states it might be the best Dreamworks movie ever and they had a blast. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #64 w 0.124 Gorgeous animation and very fun, but too hyperactive for its own good and filled with unnecessary characters that pad the runtime. Really wished I loved this more, and found that when they were in the human world was actually the strongest part. The voice cast killed it. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.959 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.95 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Despite praising animation and voice acting, they lean disappointed, criticizing hyperactivity, unnecessary characters, and padded runtime. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Praises animation, fun, and voice cast but criticizes hyperactivity and padding; wished they loved it more. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Praises animation, fun, voice cast, and human-world segments, but criticizes hyperactivity, padding characters, and says they wished they loved it more. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Praises the animation, voice cast, and fun factor, but criticizes the pacing and unnecessary characters with no clear overall lean. Grok 4.7: negative — Praises animation and cast but wished they loved it more; soft disappointment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They praise the animation, fun, and voice cast, but say it felt overstuffed and they wished they had loved it more. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Praises animation and fun, but says it's too hyperactive, padded, and they wished they loved it more; soft disappointment leans negative. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praises animation and voice cast, but criticizes pacing and padding, leading to soft disappointment. | + | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 |
| thread #65 w 0.123 when they were in the human world was actually the strongest part as i told most of my friends (i watched the advance screening last Sunday), i overall rated the movie 8/10, but i couldn't deny the opening act was 10/10, and the ending was 9+/10. my emotions were on full… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.991 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.91 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Rates it 8/10, praises its emotional impact and folklore interpretation, and eagerly anticipates watching again in 3D. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Rates it 8/10, praises opening, ending, characters and folklore interpretation, and plans a second viewing. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Rated it 8/10, praised the opening and ending, said it hit them emotionally, and plans to rewatch in 3D. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Rates the movie 8/10, praises several elements, and is excited to watch it again in 3D. Grok 4.7: positive — Rates the film 8/10, praises acts highly, and wants a second viewing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They rate it 8/10, praise its emotional impact and interpretation, and look forward to rewatching it in 3D. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.991 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Rated it 8/10, praised multiple aspects, loved the folklore interpretation, and plans to rewatch. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #66 w 0.122 Yeah, I love the first act, just watching the friendship between the girls develop as they grow. But the movie loses me once they get to the island. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.296 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.84 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Despite loving the first act, they say the movie loses them once the girls reach the island. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Loved the first act, but says the film loses them once on the island, which is most of it. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Praises the first act's friendship development but says the movie loses them once it reaches the island; no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Praised the first act and character friendship, but disliked the film once the plot reached the island. Grok 4.7: negative — Loved the first act, but the film loses them afterward. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They love the first act but say the movie loses them once the girls reach the island. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — Loves the first act but says the movie loses them once they reach the island; praise and criticism roughly balanced. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter states the movie loses them once the characters reach the island. | + | − | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | − | − | 0 | − |
| thread #67 w 0.121 So, with the revelation about Batiba....I wonder what Jo's Lola gave up to get home. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.08 P(pos)=0.02 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.60 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Speculates about a character’s backstory and plot revelation without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Speculative plot question about a character's backstory; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Plot speculation about a character's backstory; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is pure plot discussion and speculation with no evaluation of the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot speculation only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about a plot revelation and a character's past without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about plot content and a character's backstory without expressing any judgement of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses plot theories without expressing a judgement on the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #68 w 0.12 Mu friend theorized Fatima was friends with Manang and she was the one that sacrificed to let Fatime go back VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.743 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.03 P(pos)=0.98 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — The comment shares a plot theory without expressing any judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Shares a friend's plot theory about characters without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter shares a fan theory about characters and plot, without expressing any judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only shares a plot theory without expressing any opinion or verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot theory about characters; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter offers a theory about the plot without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment offers a plot theory about characters with no judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a plot theory without expressing any judgment or verdict on the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #69 w 0.12 Hmmm maybe. But then why would Lola describe Manang as some evil nightmarish vampire if they'd been friends and Manang was the one to give up that memory? VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.45 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.06 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.44 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Questions character motivations and plot logic without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot discussion questioning character motivations; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Plot discussion and speculation about character motivations, with no judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is purely plot discussion and theorizing with no judgment on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot theory about characters; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about character motivations and plot details without evaluating the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot question about a character's motivation and inconsistency; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot logic and character motivations without expressing a judgment on the film itself. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #70 w 0.119 Then what if Fatima did forget something and it was Manang's friendship, maybe Manang took it upon herself to let Fatima keep her Nakali experience in exchange of their friendship, so she doesn't have to worry about her. And that Manang also chose to give something to forget… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.176 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.02 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.66 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Speculates about characters’ memories and motivations without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Fan theory about plot and characters; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — The comment is a plot theory about characters' memories and motivations, with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses a plot theory about the characters without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot theory about characters; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment offers a plot theory without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Pure theory about plot and character motivations; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing plot theories and character motivations without expressing any judgment or verdict on the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #71 w 0.118 Overall I really liked this film but there’s a ton of issues I had. 1- it didn’t stick with one tone. The villian is one of the best I’ve ever seen in an animated film. Scary. Body horror. Then we spend 10 minutes with an adult baby character. And an army of little babies. I… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.982 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.84 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly really liked and enjoyed the film overall, despite criticisms of tonal inconsistency, pacing, and excessive jokes. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Criticizes tone and pacing but repeatedly states they really liked and enjoyed it overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says they really liked and enjoyed it overall, praising the villain, despite criticisms of tone and pacing; leans positive, implying 9/10 potential. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Despite noting tone and pacing issues, the commenter explicitly states 'Overall I really liked/enjoyed this film'. Grok 4.7: positive — Liked and enjoyed it overall despite tone and pacing issues. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say they really liked and enjoyed the film overall, despite criticizing its tone and pacing. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Opens with 'Overall I really liked this film' and ends 'I really enjoyed it still'; criticisms are outweighed by stated enjoyment. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states they really liked the film and enjoyed it overall despite several issues. | + | − | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #72 w 0.117 the Philippines is so dense with personalities, which is exactly why I attribute this movie to be so "over active". from world class tropics to over populated urban city - the daily life moves so fast. the sensory overload is too much, but for a modern "kids movie" set in the… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.41 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.89 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Ranks it alongside favorite animated films, justifies its sensory overload, and hopes it finds an audience. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Acknowledges sensory overload but justifies it, ranks it alongside KPop Demon Hunters and Spider-Verse. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter defends the overactive style as necessary, ranks the film alongside favorites like Spider-Verse, and hopes it finds an audience. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Justifies the film's sensory overload, compares it favorably to Spider-Verse, and hopes it finds an audience. Grok 4.7: positive — Ranks it with Spider-Verse despite noting necessary sensory overload. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Despite the sensory overload, they consider it necessary and rank it alongside acclaimed animated films. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the sensory overload too much but says it was necessary, ranks it alongside Spider-Verse, and hopes it finds an audience. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Compares it favorably to top-tier animated films and hopes it finds an audience. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #73 w 0.116 Really great animation and voice acting but damn, it was just a complete sensory overload. No time to breathe unfortunately. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.875 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.83 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Praises animation and acting, but overall finds the film overwhelming and lacking breathing room. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Praises animation and voice acting but criticizes sensory overload and relentless pacing; no clear overall lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Praises animation and voice acting but criticizes the film as a relentless sensory overload with no room to breathe; no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Praises the animation and voice acting, but criticizes the pacing and sensory overload with no clear overall lean. Grok 4.7: mixed — Praises animation and voices but criticizes sensory overload and pacing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — Praises the animation and voice acting, but says the sensory overload and relentless pace hurt the experience. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — Praises animation and voice acting but criticizes the relentless pacing as overwhelming; no clear overall lean. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praises animation and voice acting, but criticizes the relentless sensory overload. | − | + | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #74 w 0.115 Loved it! The animation was gorgeous and the voice acting was superb. Manang and Batiba were both terrifying in their own ways. I always enjoy learning about new cultures this way, so I feel it's a must watch. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.952 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.75 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly loved it, praised the animation and voice acting, and called it a must-watch. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Loved it, praises the animation and voice acting, and calls it a must watch; 'terrifying' is praise for the villains. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says they loved it, praises animation and voice acting, calls it a must watch; the terrifying characters are praised, not criticized. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly loved the film, praised the animation and voice acting, and called it a must watch. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly loved it and calls it a must-watch. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter loves the film, praises its animation and voice acting, and calls it a must-watch. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter loved the film, praising animation and voice acting, and explicitly calls it a must watch. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they 'Loved it!' and calls it a 'must watch'. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #75 w 0.115 Manang is legitimately the most horrifying eldritch villain Dreamworks has ever made. Possibly one of the most terrifying in any animated film. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.776 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.87 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film’s villain as exceptionally horrifying and terrifying, indicating appreciation rather than criticism. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the villain as exceptionally terrifying, which counts as admiration for the film's craft. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the villain as terrifying, which per guidelines is positive; implies admiration for the film's villain without criticizing the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — High praise for the film's villain being effectively horrifying and terrifying. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the villain as terrifying and among the best in animation. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the villain terrifying, expressing praise for the film’s horror effect. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the villain as terrifying and one of the best animated horror villains, implying strong approval of the film's scary content. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising the villain as horrifying and terrifying counts as strong positive praise for the film. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #76 w 0.114 Real. The Batiba being a cat in this depiction and her purring that aggressively when she smelled their memories. Creeeeepy. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.318 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.72 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.37 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes the Batiba’s depiction and behavior as creepy without judging the film’s quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a creepy scene with no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on a creepy creature depiction and scene details; it doesn't clearly judge the film overall as good or bad. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises a specific depiction and moment in the film as effectively creepy. Grok 4.7: positive — Emphasizes the depiction as creepy, praising the scare. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a creepy character depiction without judging whether the film itself was good or worth recommending. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a creepy scene and character detail with no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a specific scene and element without expressing an overall judgment on the film. | − | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #77 w 0.113 I grew up hearing stories related to our myths during siesta time & I read related literature as hobby. There's a scene in the film where Jo used her finger to point and I gasped a little. How dare she used her fingers to point?! In the mythical realm too! I read that we point… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.439 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.20 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.82 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses mythology, character theories, and casting trivia without an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses Filipino folklore, cultural details and theories; finds one scene funny but gives no overall judgement. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses Filipino folklore connections, theories, and trivia about the film without explicitly judging its quality or recommending it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Focuses on folklore trivia, plot theories, and minor observations without giving an overall verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Cultural notes, theories, and trivia; no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They call the film’s scene with dwendes riding white chickens funny, expressing a positive reaction to the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses myths, theories, and trivia about the film's content without clearly judging whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses cultural myths, movie scenes, and theories without expressing a clear verdict on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #78 w 0.113 So that’s why the older woman pointed with her lips VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.44 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.50 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — The comment notes a plot detail without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comment explains a cultural detail from a scene; it gives no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment discusses a plot detail or observation about a scene without expressing any judgement of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes an observation about a specific character's action without expressing any opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot realization only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — This is an observation about a character’s gesture, with no evaluation of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a plot-detail observation about a character's gesture, with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a specific plot detail as a joke or realization without judging the film. | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #79 w 0.112 It’s a great movie overall, but did anyone else feel like the side characters were mostly useless? They were definitely going with a “found family” aspect with the mythological creatures gradually joining them, but the Merman and Megamind Baby especially felt barely relevant… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.686 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.91 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly calls it a great movie overall, despite criticism of underused side characters. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a great movie overall; the criticism of the side characters is minor. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it 'a great movie overall' and raises a side-character criticism as a minor caveat, so the lean is positive. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Explicitly calls it a 'great movie overall' despite minor criticism regarding the relevance of the side characters. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a great movie overall despite weak side characters. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They call it a great movie overall, despite criticizing the relevance of some side characters. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Opens by calling it a great movie overall; the side-character complaints are a minor critique within a positive verdict. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praises the movie overall, but criticizes the useless side characters. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #80 w 0.111 One of the best aspects of The Last Wish was the balanced approach to the side characters, whether focal or comic relief Feels like this film lost the handling in that regard. Now bad, per se, none got annoying for me but certainly overstuffed VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.795 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.77 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the film’s handling of side characters as overstuffed, despite noting none were annoying. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Says the film mishandled side characters and felt overstuffed. The critique is soft, but there is no offsetting praise. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Compares unfavorably to The Last Wish, saying the film lost the balanced handling of side characters and feels overstuffed; only mild concession that it's not bad. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the film's handling of side characters as 'certainly overstuffed', though softened with 'Not bad, per se'. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes this film as overstuffed and weaker at handling side characters. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film’s handling of side characters as overstuffed and worse than the prior film’s. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.795 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter feels the film lost its handling of side characters and was overstuffed. | + | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #81 w 0.11 I felt that they were a detriment to the movie and it got better for a while when they were unceremoniously left behind. The pack visits Bungi, gets told about Truffle - which leads to Mermahn - then both Bungi and Mermahn have almost nothing to contribute to the core themes to… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.535 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.97 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes characters as shallow, their contributions as detrimental, and an entire sequence as a waste of audience time. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes characters and sequence as shallow, a waste of time, and a detriment to the movie. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter criticizes characters and sequence as detriments, a waste of time, shallow, and failing to convey themes. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the characters and plot sequences as shallow, extraneous, and a waste of the audience's time. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls characters a detriment and a sequence a waste of time. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They call the sequence a detriment and waste of time, criticizing its shallow characters and lack of thematic contribution. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter says the Bungi/Mermahn sequence is a detriment, a waste of time, and shallow, criticizing the film's storytelling. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter calls parts of the movie a detriment, shallow, and a waste of time. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #82 w 0.11 I largely agree that their introduction in the second act dragged. But I felt it helped the payoffs feel earned in the stellar third act. Knowing Filipinos, I understand why they'd want to cram everything in , because maybe this is their one shot to see their culture on the big… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.846 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.89 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the stellar third act and earned payoffs, finding the pacing and heavy-handed cultural references forgivable. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Admits the second act dragged but calls the third act stellar and forgives the flaws; overall favorable. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Acknowledges second-act drag and heavy-handedness but calls the third act stellar, finds payoffs earned, and forgives flaws; leans positive. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Acknowledges minor flaws like pacing and heavy-handedness, but defends them and praises the 'stellar third act'. Grok 4.7: positive — Acknowledges pacing and heavy-handedness but praises earned, stellar third-act payoffs. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Despite noting a dragging introduction and heavy-handed references, they praise the third act and find the flaws forgivable. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.846 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Acknowledges pacing flaws in the second act, but praises the stellar third act and overall film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #83 w 0.109 Not a slight against the movie at all and I understand why they ended it where they did, but man do I wish they had a credits sequence where adult Jo & Raissa got to rock out with the Nakali crew one more time (a la Shrek) VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.778 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.53 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.89 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Wishes for an extra credits scene while explicitly avoiding criticism; offers no overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Explicitly not criticizing; wishes for more time with the characters, implying affection for the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Explicitly says it's not a slight against the movie and understands the ending; wishes for more of the characters, implying affection. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter discusses a wish for a credits sequence without clearly stating if they liked the movie overall. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Wishes for a fun credits scene while explicitly not criticizing the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly say it is not a slight against the movie and wish they could spend more time with its characters. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.778 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter expresses a personal wish for a different ending scene rather than judging the film's quality. | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | 0 |
| thread #84 w 0.108 What a fever dream of a movie (meant in the best way) It wasn’t a perfect 10/10, but it was a fun ride! And my goodness the Manang was terrifying VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.947 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.83 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls it a fun ride and a fever dream in the best way, praising the terrifying Manang. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a fun ride and a fever dream in the best way; scary villain is praise; minor caveat. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it a fever dream 'in the best way' and a fun ride; minor caveat of not perfect, and praises the terrifying Manang. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises the film as a 'fun ride' and effectively scary, despite noting it isn't perfect. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a fun fever dream despite not being perfect; terror is praise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it a fun ride despite not being perfect; the terrifying character is praised. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls it a fever dream meant in the best way and a fun ride, despite not being perfect. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Called it a fun ride and meant fever dream in the best way. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #85 w 0.108 I really really really loved this movie. It felt cool to see the expression of a culture I wasn't privy to before. I loved the use of mixed animation between the 3D and 2D segments and the reaction emphasis bubbles. It feels like animation techniques are finally catching up… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.941 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.59 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly loved the movie, praised its animation and themes, and found it engrossing despite one minor criticism. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Loved the film, praised its animation and culture, kids hooked; only a minor criticism about thematic parallels. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic praise ('really really really loved'), kids were hooked, celebrates animation and ambition; only a minor criticism about the Manang-Jo parallel. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the movie and praises its animation and engaging story despite one minor criticism. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the film and kids were hooked; one minor theme critique. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They repeatedly praise the film, stayed engrossed, and eagerly anticipate similar movies, despite one minor criticism. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.941 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states they 'really really really loved this movie' and praises its animation and cultural representation despite minor thematic critique. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #86 w 0.107 Manananggal is easily one of the coolest villains I’ve seen in any movie (animated or not) in a while, I was locked in any time she was on screen! VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.509 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Enthusiastically praises the film’s villain and describes being captivated whenever she appeared. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the villain as one of the coolest in a while and says they were fully engaged. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the Manananggal as one of the coolest villains in a while and says they were locked in whenever she appeared, signaling enjoyment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter strongly praises the movie's villain and how engaging her scenes were. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the villain and being locked in during her scenes. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the villain and says they were captivated whenever she appeared. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the villain one of the coolest seen in a while and says they were locked in whenever she appeared, a clear endorsement. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises the villain and states they were completely engaged during her scenes. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #88 w 0.106 I just watched this movie, easily one of the best movies from DreamWorks animation. What I really like about this movie is that the filmmakers spent approximately 20 minutes to convince us why the friendship between Jo and Raissa worth to remember and root for, I think that… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.935 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.77 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls it one of DreamWorks’ best and praises the friendship development for making the climax effective. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it one of DreamWorks' best and praises the friendship setup that made the climax work. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it easily one of DreamWorks' best and praises how the friendship setup made the climax work. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter calls it one of DreamWorks' best movies and praises the pacing and climax. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it one of DreamWorks' best and praises the friendship buildup. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it one of DreamWorks' best and praises the friendship setup and effective climax. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls it easily one of DreamWorks' best and praises the friendship and climax. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls it one of the best movies and praises the friendship and climax. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #89 w 0.105 I really enjoyed the movie. The animation is great. I especially liked the flying sequences and that so many characters got to fly. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.895 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.65 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly enjoyed the movie and praised its animation, flying sequences, and characters getting to fly. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter says they really enjoyed it and praises the animation and flying sequences. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they really enjoyed the movie and praises the animation and flying sequences. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they really enjoyed the movie and praises the animation and flying sequences. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly enjoyed the movie and praised animation and flying sequences. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly enjoyed the movie and praises its animation and flying sequences. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they really enjoyed the movie and praises the animation and flying sequences. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they really enjoyed the movie and praises the animation and flying sequences. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #91 w 0.104 Highly recommended for anyone that likes K-POP Demon Hunters or Spider-Man Spiderverse movies. There is a lot of laugh out loud outrageous moments along with some tear ups. It's heartfelt with emotions of friendships forming and ending due to life changes. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.891 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.78 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.82 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Highly recommends the film, praising its outrageous humor, emotional moments, and heartfelt portrayal of friendships. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Explicitly highly recommends it, praising funny moments, emotional scenes, and heartfelt friendship themes. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Explicitly recommends the film, praising its humor, heartfelt emotion, and themes of friendship. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states the movie is "Highly recommended" and praises its humor, emotion, and heartfelt story. Grok 4.7: positive — Highly recommends the film and praises its humor and heartfelt emotion. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Highly recommends the film and praises its humor, emotional moments, and heartfelt friendships. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Explicitly highly recommends the film, praising its laughs, emotional moments, and heartfelt tone. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly recommends the film and praises its humor, emotion, and heartfelt moments. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #92 w 0.104 I can't get over Raissa being like "I'm gonna steal her wings" and actually going through with it. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.178 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.94 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.44 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Reacts to a character's actions without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Reacts to a character's action without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment reacts to a plot point and character action without giving any judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely describes a character's actions and a plot point without offering any judgment on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Reacts to a character's plot action without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on Raissa's actions without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a plot moment and a character's action without expressing any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses a specific plot point without giving a judgment on the film. | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #93 w 0.103 Just got out of the film. Full disclosure, I'm a 47 year old man and I love animated movies. The spiderverse movies being two of my favorites. I really felt like this film could have been quieter. What I mean by that is every character and scene (save for like the last 10… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.973 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.92 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly says he ultimately liked the film, despite criticizing its relentless intensity and lack of quieter moments. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Criticizes overwhelming intensity but praises animation and leads, and says they ultimately liked the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — VADER 0.973 Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Despite finding the pacing overly hyperactive, the commenter explicitly states they ultimately liked the film, animation, and main characters. Grok 4.7: positive — Ultimately liked it despite wanting quieter, less over-the-top moments. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Ultimately liked the film despite wishing it had quieter moments. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — VADER 0.973 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states 'I ultimately liked the film' despite finding it overly frantic. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + |
| thread #94 w 0.103 This is copied from my Letterboxd review, but still, really glad I watched this, especially being Filipino and all. I wish I loved this film. Like I like it, but I really wanted to LOVE this film, you know? Don’t get me wrong, the third act has some of the best setpieces and… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.999 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.95 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly likes the film and is glad they watched it, praising direction and emotional payoff despite substantial writing criticisms. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Criticizes writing and pacing but says they like it, are glad they watched, and praise visuals and ending. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Praises visuals, voice acting, third act, and ending, but criticizes writing and pacing; says 'I like it' but wished to love it, balanced overall. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Explicitly states they liked the film and were glad they watched it, despite pacing and writing flaws. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly likes it and is glad they watched, despite wanting to love it more. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They praise the visuals, performances, and ending, but criticize the writing and pacing and say they only like it, not love it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — VADER 0.999 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Despite heavy criticisms of the writing and pacing, the user ultimately states they like the film and respect the directors. | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | 0 | + |
| thread #95 w 0.102 I'm Filipino-American so I just had to take my kids to see an early screening on Sunday afternoon. We loved it! It was great seeing the representation and some of the cultural references had me laughing hard (like pointing with your lips!) The animation was beautiful. I… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.968 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.57 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — They loved it, praised its humor, representation, and animation, and rated it 8/10 despite limited depth. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Loved it, praised representation, humor, animation; minor complaint about depth, still rated 8/10. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — They loved it, praised representation, humor and animation, and gave 8/10; the criticism about surface-level depth is minor and outweighed. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the film and gave it an 8/10 despite minor criticisms about depth. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved it and rated 8/10 despite wanting more depth. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They loved it and rate it 8/10, despite wishing it had more depth. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — They loved it, praised representation and animation, and gave an 8/10 despite wishing for more depth. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter stated 'We loved it!', praised the representation and animation, and gave it an 8/10 overall. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #96 w 0.102 My favorite part was when Poochie wasn't on screen, all the other characters kept looking around asking "Where's Poochie?" VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.459 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.90 P(pos)=0.96 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.73 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A Simpsons reference presented as a joke, without a clear judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — A Simpsons 'Poochie' quote used as a joke, with no clear judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Joke referencing The Simpsons' Poochie bit; no sincere judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a joke referencing The Simpsons and offers no actual opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: negative — Sarcastic Poochie joke implying the film's best part was an element's absence. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The joke expresses dislike of a character’s screen presence, not a clear verdict on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Joke about a character's absence; it makes no judgement of the film's quality or whether the commenter would recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a TV show quote/joke (The Simpsons) and does not judge the film. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #97 w 0.101 Good movie but a bit distracted and way too fast and bloated. Could have made space in the movie by writing out the merman and the little mushroom people. I think we didn’t need more than the trio, so the big baby could have stayed with his mother. It feels like there’s two… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.273 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.96 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls it a good movie and loves the demon lady’s scenes, despite substantial pacing and plotting criticisms. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Calls it a good movie and loved the demon lady, but criticises it heavily as bloated, rushed and unfocused. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Opens with 'Good movie' and loved the demon lady's scenes; criticisms of bloat and pacing are framed as improvements, so overall leans positive. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Calls it a good movie and loved certain scenes, but heavily criticizes the bloated, unfocused plot and pacing. Grok 4.7: mixed — Calls it a good movie but criticizes pacing, bloat, and shoehorned plot. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — Calls it a good movie and praises the demon lady’s scenes, but criticizes the pacing, bloat, and disconnected plots. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.273 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Calls it a good movie but criticizes pacing, bloat, and plotting issues. | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 |
| thread #98 w 0.101 ngl the first half of the movie felt like it was made to keep kids brainrotted tiktok mind's attention. the first half genuinely just felt like jingling keys for kids but it was still not as bad as that second Mario movie. The second half though... oh boy that was actually so… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.953 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.93 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Despite disliking the first half, they enthusiastically praise the second half’s emotional depth and impact. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Disliked the first half, but loved the deep, emotional second half; overall enjoyment leans positive. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Criticized the first half but strongly praised the second half as great and emotional, surprised by how much they enjoyed the film overall. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Disliked the 'brainrotted' first half, but strongly praised the deep and emotional second half. Grok 4.7: positive — Disliked the first half but strongly enjoyed the emotional second half overall. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Despite strongly disliking the first half, they loved the second half and found the film deep and emotional. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.953 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Disliked the first half for its pacing, but deeply loved the second half, leading to overall mixed-to-positive feelings. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #99 w 0.1 I wonder what memory Jo's lola gave up VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.08 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.41 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Asks a plot-related question without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Speculative plot question about a character's memory; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Speculation about a plot detail (a character's lost memory) with no judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only speculates on a plot point without expressing any opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot speculation about a character's memory, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — This is a question about the plot, with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about a plot detail (what memory Jo's lola gave up) without expressing any judgement of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is only asking a plot question without expressing any opinion on the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |